• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过正确的知识实现更好的气候行动?开发并验证一个测量气候有效性知识的项目反应理论量表。

Better climate action through the right knowledge? Development and validation of an item-response-theory scale measuring climate effectiveness knowledge.

作者信息

Simon Clara Elisa, Merten Martin Julian

机构信息

Department of Environmental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 14;15:1347407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1347407. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1347407
PMID:39618995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11605514/
Abstract

Knowledge about the relative environmental impact and climate-protective potential of different actions () is important for successful sustainable action. However, there is currently no scale for measuring effectiveness knowledge that meets psychometric quality criteria. We developed a new scale consisting of 16 ranking and choice tasks and tested it on a convenience sample of 278 people from Germany in an online study. The final scale version achieved a reliability of = 0.655. This is significantly higher than the reliability of 0.329 achieved by an established knowledge scale used for comparison. Inter-correlation of both scales was moderate to strong, but the new scale is able to explain 3% additional variance in high-impact pro-environmental behavior when controlling for environmental attitude, whereas the established scale is not explaining any additional variance, indicating incremental validity of our scale. We conclude that it is possible to use ranking tasks to measure effectiveness knowledge more reliably in a test-efficient way and provide a set of items which are usable in the contemporary German context.

摘要

了解不同行动()的相对环境影响和气候保护潜力对于成功开展可持续行动至关重要。然而,目前尚无符合心理测量质量标准的衡量有效性知识的量表。我们开发了一个由16个排序和选择任务组成的新量表,并在一项在线研究中对来自德国的278人的便利样本进行了测试。最终的量表版本信度为 = 0.655。这显著高于用于比较的既定知识量表所达到的0.329的信度。两个量表的相互关联为中度到强度,但新量表在控制环境态度时能够解释高影响力亲环境行为中3%的额外方差,而既定量表无法解释任何额外方差,这表明我们的量表具有增量效度。我们得出结论,使用排序任务以测试高效的方式更可靠地衡量有效性知识是可行的,并提供了一组可在当代德国背景下使用的项目。

相似文献

1
Better climate action through the right knowledge? Development and validation of an item-response-theory scale measuring climate effectiveness knowledge.通过正确的知识实现更好的气候行动?开发并验证一个测量气候有效性知识的项目反应理论量表。
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 14;15:1347407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1347407. eCollection 2024.
2
Measuring consumers' knowledge of the environmental impact of foods.测量消费者对食品环境影响的认知。
Appetite. 2021 Dec 1;167:105622. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105622. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
3
Student nurses' knowledge and skills of children's environmental health: Instrument development and psychometric analysis using item response theory.学生护士的儿童环境卫生知识和技能:使用项目反应理论开发工具和心理测量分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Oct;69:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
4
Transcultural Adaptation of Environmental Health Questionnaire with Attitude, Knowledge, and Skills Scales for Portuguese Nursing Students.针对葡萄牙护理专业学生的环境健康问卷的跨文化适应性研究:态度、知识和技能量表
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):13. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15010013.
5
[Development of safety climate measurement at workplace: validity and reliability assessment].[工作场所安全氛围测量的发展:效度与信度评估]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2007 Jul;38(4):720-4.
6
The development and psychometric properties of the bipolar disorders knowledge scale.双相障碍知识量表的编制及心理测量学特性。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:645-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.043. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
7
Measuring Electronic Health Literacy: Development, Validation, and Test of Measurement Invariance of a Revised German Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale.测量电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表修订版的德国版本的开发、验证和测量不变性测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e28252. doi: 10.2196/28252.
8
Psychometric properties of self-report concussion scales and checklists.自我报告脑震荡量表和清单的心理计量特性。
J Athl Train. 2012 Mar-Apr;47(2):221-3. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.2.221.
9
Validation of a Chinese Version of the Digital Stress Scale and Development of a Short Form Based on Item Response Theory Among Chinese College Students.中文版数字压力量表的验证及基于项目反应理论的中国大学生简版量表的编制
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jul 31;16:2897-2911. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S413162. eCollection 2023.
10
[Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].《青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)法语版的翻译与验证》
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):499-505.

本文引用的文献

1
How psychology can help limit climate change.心理学如何帮助限制气候变化。
Am Psychol. 2021 Jan;76(1):130-144. doi: 10.1037/amp0000624. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
2
Environment-Specific vs. General Knowledge and Their Role in Pro-environmental Behavior.特定环境知识与一般知识及其在环保行为中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 2;10:718. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00718. eCollection 2019.
3
An Investigation of the Impact of Guessing on Coefficient α and Reliability.猜测对系数α及信度影响的调查
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Jun;39(4):264-277. doi: 10.1177/0146621614559516. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
4
Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers.通过生产者和消费者减少食物对环境的影响。
Science. 2018 Jun 1;360(6392):987-992. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0216.
5
Help the climate, change your diet: A cross-sectional study on how to involve consumers in a transition to a low-carbon society.帮助气候,改变饮食:一项关于如何让消费者参与向低碳社会转型的横断面研究。
Appetite. 2016 Mar 1;98:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
6
Sustainability. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet.可持续性。行星边界:在不断变化的星球上指导人类发展。
Science. 2015 Feb 13;347(6223):1259855. doi: 10.1126/science.1259855. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
7
Reversed thresholds in partial credit models: a reason for collapsing categories?部分计分模型中的反向阈值:类别合并的一个原因?
Assessment. 2014 Dec;21(6):765-74. doi: 10.1177/1073191114530775. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
8
Properties of Rasch residual fit statistics.拉施残差拟合统计量的性质。
J Appl Meas. 2013;14(4):339-55.
9
Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings.公众对能源消耗和节约的看法。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 14;107(37):16054-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001509107. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
10
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.