Simon Clara Elisa, Merten Martin Julian
Department of Environmental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 14;15:1347407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1347407. eCollection 2024.
Knowledge about the relative environmental impact and climate-protective potential of different actions () is important for successful sustainable action. However, there is currently no scale for measuring effectiveness knowledge that meets psychometric quality criteria. We developed a new scale consisting of 16 ranking and choice tasks and tested it on a convenience sample of 278 people from Germany in an online study. The final scale version achieved a reliability of = 0.655. This is significantly higher than the reliability of 0.329 achieved by an established knowledge scale used for comparison. Inter-correlation of both scales was moderate to strong, but the new scale is able to explain 3% additional variance in high-impact pro-environmental behavior when controlling for environmental attitude, whereas the established scale is not explaining any additional variance, indicating incremental validity of our scale. We conclude that it is possible to use ranking tasks to measure effectiveness knowledge more reliably in a test-efficient way and provide a set of items which are usable in the contemporary German context.
了解不同行动()的相对环境影响和气候保护潜力对于成功开展可持续行动至关重要。然而,目前尚无符合心理测量质量标准的衡量有效性知识的量表。我们开发了一个由16个排序和选择任务组成的新量表,并在一项在线研究中对来自德国的278人的便利样本进行了测试。最终的量表版本信度为 = 0.655。这显著高于用于比较的既定知识量表所达到的0.329的信度。两个量表的相互关联为中度到强度,但新量表在控制环境态度时能够解释高影响力亲环境行为中3%的额外方差,而既定量表无法解释任何额外方差,这表明我们的量表具有增量效度。我们得出结论,使用排序任务以测试高效的方式更可靠地衡量有效性知识是可行的,并提供了一组可在当代德国背景下使用的项目。