• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用自动试题生成创建计算机化形成性测试的解决方案及原理。

Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Solutions and Rationales for Computerized Formative Testing.

作者信息

Gierl Mark J, Lai Hollis

机构信息

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Jan;42(1):42-57. doi: 10.1177/0146621617726788. Epub 2017 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1177/0146621617726788
PMID:29881111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5978592/
Abstract

Computerized testing provides many benefits to support formative assessment. However, the advent of computerized formative testing has also raised formidable new challenges, particularly in the area of item development. Large numbers of diverse, high-quality test items are required because items are continuously administered to students. Hence, hundreds of items are needed to develop the banks necessary for computerized formative testing. One promising approach that may be used to address this test development challenge is automatic item generation. Automatic item generation is a relatively new but rapidly evolving research area where cognitive and psychometric modeling practices are used to produce items with the aid of computer technology. The purpose of this study is to describe a new method for generating the items and the rationales required to solve the items to produce the required feedback for computerized formative testing. The method for rationale generation is demonstrated and evaluated in the medical education domain.

摘要

计算机化测试为支持形成性评估带来了诸多益处。然而,计算机化形成性测试的出现也带来了巨大的新挑战,尤其是在试题开发领域。由于需要持续向学生提供试题,所以需要大量多样、高质量的测试题。因此,开发计算机化形成性测试所需的题库需要数百道试题。一种有望用于应对这一测试开发挑战的方法是自动试题生成。自动试题生成是一个相对较新但发展迅速的研究领域,它利用认知和心理测量建模方法借助计算机技术来生成试题。本研究的目的是描述一种生成试题以及解答这些试题所需的原理依据的新方法,以便为计算机化形成性测试提供所需的反馈。在医学教育领域对原理依据生成方法进行了演示和评估。

相似文献

1
Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Solutions and Rationales for Computerized Formative Testing.利用自动试题生成创建计算机化形成性测试的解决方案及原理。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Jan;42(1):42-57. doi: 10.1177/0146621617726788. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
2
Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.使用自动试题生成来提高多项选择题干扰项的质量。
Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(2):166-73. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1146608.
3
Using automatic item generation to create multiple-choice test items.使用自动项目生成技术来创建多项选择题测试项目。
Med Educ. 2012 Aug;46(8):757-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04289.x.
4
Three Sources of Validation Evidence Needed to Evaluate the Quality of Generated Test Items for Medical Licensure.评估用于医疗许可考试的生成试题质量需要三种验证证据来源。
Teach Learn Med. 2024 Jan-Mar;36(1):72-82. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2119569. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
5
A suggestive approach for assessing item quality, usability and validity of Automatic Item Generation.自动出题的项目质量、可用性和有效性评估的一种提示方法。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 Dec;28(5):1441-1465. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10225-y. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
6
Three Modeling Applications to Promote Automatic Item Generation for Examinations in Dentistry.三种用于促进牙科考试自动试题生成的建模应用。
J Dent Educ. 2016 Mar;80(3):339-47.
7
An Extended Validity Argument for Assessing Feedback Culture.评估反馈文化的扩展效度论证
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(4):355-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1077133.
8
Using cognitive models to develop quality multiple-choice questions.运用认知模型来编制高质量的多项选择题。
Med Teach. 2016 Aug;38(8):838-43. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1150989. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
9
Evaluating the quality of medical multiple-choice items created with automated processes.评估使用自动化流程创建的医学多项选择题的质量。
Med Educ. 2013 Jul;47(7):726-33. doi: 10.1111/medu.12202.
10
Feasibility assurance: a review of automatic item generation in medical assessment.可行性保证:医学评估中自动项目生成的回顾。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 May;27(2):405-425. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10092-z. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A suggestive approach for assessing item quality, usability and validity of Automatic Item Generation.自动出题的项目质量、可用性和有效性评估的一种提示方法。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 Dec;28(5):1441-1465. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10225-y. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
2
Feasibility assurance: a review of automatic item generation in medical assessment.可行性保证:医学评估中自动项目生成的回顾。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 May;27(2):405-425. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10092-z. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
3
Building an intelligent recommendation system for personalized test scheduling in computerized assessments: A reinforcement learning approach.构建计算机化评估中个性化测试调度的智能推荐系统:一种强化学习方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):216-232. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01602-9. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
4
Challenges and Future Directions of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Education.大数据与人工智能在教育领域面临的挑战及未来发展方向
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 19;11:580820. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580820. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Three Modeling Applications to Promote Automatic Item Generation for Examinations in Dentistry.三种用于促进牙科考试自动试题生成的建模应用。
J Dent Educ. 2016 Mar;80(3):339-47.
2
Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.使用自动试题生成来提高多项选择题干扰项的质量。
Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(2):166-73. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1146608.
3
Using automatic item generation to create multiple-choice test items.使用自动项目生成技术来创建多项选择题测试项目。
Med Educ. 2012 Aug;46(8):757-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04289.x.
4
The Medical Council of Canada's key features project: a more valid written examination of clinical decision-making skills.加拿大医学委员会的关键特征项目:对临床决策技能进行更有效的笔试。
Acad Med. 1995 Feb;70(2):104-10. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199502000-00012.
5
Item modelling procedure for constructing content-equivalent multiple choice questions.构建内容等效的多项选择题的项目建模程序。
Med Educ. 1986 Jan;20(1):53-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01042.x.