Suppr超能文献

骨质疏松症和骨质减少患者骨折风险的比较评估:一项横断面研究。

Comparative assessment of fracture risk among osteoporosis and osteopenia patients: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Tomasevic-Todorovic Snezana, Vazic Atina, Issaka Abukari, Hanna Fahad

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.

Higher School, College of Professional Studies in Education of Teachers, Kikinda, Serbia.

出版信息

Open Access Rheumatol. 2018 May 30;10:61-66. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S151307. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both osteoporosis and osteopenia remain worldwide public health concerns. They both lead to bone fractures, which can lead to disability and burden on those who are afflicted.

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare fracture risk between these two groups of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our cross-sectional study included 82 patients (46 with osteoporosis and 36 with osteopenia) with an average age of 63±9.33 years, who received treatment at the Clinic for Medical Rehabilitation, Clinical Center of Vojvodina in Novi Sad, Serbia. The assessment of the fracture risk was executed by applying the Fracture Assessment Risk (FRAX) index (an algorithm developed by the World Health Organization) based on clinical fracture risks or combination of clinical fracture risks and bone mineral density.

RESULTS

Patients with osteoporosis had significantly higher risk of major fracture compared to patients with osteopenia (<0.01). Results from FRAX index in osteoporotic patients showed that more than half (58.70%) of patients had a low risk of fracture; less than one-third of patients (30.43%) had an intermediate risk of major osteoporotic fracture, while almost four out of every 10 (39.96%) had a high risk of hip fracture. The majority of patients with osteopenia (63.89%) had a low risk of major osteoporotic fracture, while 36.11% of them had an intermediate risk. The majority of patients with osteopenia (91.67%) had a low risk of hip fracture. Statistically significant differences in relation to specific fracture risks between patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia, in particular, weight (=-2.250, =0.027*) and previous fractures (=2.985, =0.004**), were established.

CONCLUSION

Osteoporosis patients had a high risk of major osteoporotic fracture, while there was no association between the intermediate level for major osteoporotic fracture and osteo-penia. For patients suffering from an increased fracture risk, especially those who had already been diagnosed with osteoporosis, preventive measures such as designing individual therapeutic programs should be adopted.

摘要

背景

骨质疏松症和骨质减少仍然是全球公共卫生关注的问题。它们都会导致骨折,进而导致残疾并给患者带来负担。

目的

评估和比较这两组患者的骨折风险。

患者与方法

我们的横断面研究纳入了82例患者(46例骨质疏松症患者和36例骨质减少患者),平均年龄为63±9.33岁,他们在塞尔维亚诺维萨德伏伊伏丁那临床中心医学康复诊所接受治疗。通过应用骨折评估风险(FRAX)指数(世界卫生组织开发的一种算法),基于临床骨折风险或临床骨折风险与骨密度的组合来评估骨折风险。

结果

与骨质减少患者相比,骨质疏松症患者发生主要骨折的风险显著更高(<0.01)。骨质疏松症患者的FRAX指数结果显示,超过一半(58.70%)的患者骨折风险较低;不到三分之一的患者(30.43%)有中度骨质疏松性骨折风险,则每10人中有近4人(39.96%)有较高的髋部骨折风险。大多数骨质减少患者(63.89%)有较低的骨质疏松性骨折风险,而其中36.11%有中度风险。大多数骨质减少患者(91.67%)有较低的髋部骨折风险。确定了骨质疏松症患者和骨质减少患者在特定骨折风险方面的统计学显著差异,特别是体重(=-2.250,=0.027*)和既往骨折(=2.985,=0.004**)。

结论

骨质疏松症患者有较高的骨质疏松性骨折风险,而中度骨质疏松性骨折水平与骨质减少之间无关联。对于骨折风险增加的患者,尤其是那些已被诊断为骨质疏松症的患者),应采取诸如制定个体化治疗方案等预防措施。

相似文献

1
Comparative assessment of fracture risk among osteoporosis and osteopenia patients: a cross-sectional study.
Open Access Rheumatol. 2018 May 30;10:61-66. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S151307. eCollection 2018.
2
Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(20):1-180. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
4
Primary care use of FRAX: absolute fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women and older men.
Postgrad Med. 2010 Jan;122(1):82-90. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2010.01.2102.
5
Clinical risk factor status in patients with vertebral fracture but normal bone mineral density.
Spine J. 2022 Oct;22(10):1634-1641. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.05.019. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
9
Bone mass, fracture risk, and associated factors in postmenopausal women living with HIV.
Menopause. 2024 Jan 1;31(1):46-51. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002293. Epub 2023 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Overlap between Osteosarcopenia and Frailty and their Association with Poor Health Conditions: The Bushehr Elderly Health Program.
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2024 Jun;28(2):219-227. doi: 10.4235/agmr.23.0220. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
3
Epimedium for Osteoporosis Based on Western and Eastern Medicine: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 31;13:782096. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.782096. eCollection 2022.
4
Does Superior Bone Health Promote a Longer Lifespan?
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 Aug 3;12:21514593211036231. doi: 10.1177/21514593211036231. eCollection 2021.
5
Effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on bone health among breast cancer patients. Does it require intervention?
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6957-6972. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06231-8. Epub 2021 May 6.
6
Gingival-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell from Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): Isolation, Culture, and Characterization.
Eur J Dent. 2021 May;15(2):332-339. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1719213. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Osteoporosis--a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases: a follow-up study.
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2015 Jan-Feb;143(1-2):28-34. doi: 10.2298/sarh1502028t.
5
[Missed opportunities for prevention of hip fracture in older patients].
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2012 May;69(5):420-4. doi: 10.2298/vsp1205420d.
7
Review of the long-term disability associated with hip fractures.
Inj Prev. 2011 Dec;17(6):365-70. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.029579. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
8
Association of collagen type I alpha1 gene polymorphism with bone mineral density in osteoporotic women in Serbia.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Jul;19(7):1299-303. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1698.
9
Management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: 2010 position statement of The North American Menopause Society.
Menopause. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):25-54; quiz 55-6. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181c617e6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验