Suppr超能文献

玻璃体内地塞米松植入物治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:基于德尔菲法的专家建议

Management of diabetic macular edema with intravitreal dexamethasone implants: Expert recommendations using a Delphi-based approach.

作者信息

Giovannini Alfonso, Parravano Mariacristina, Ricci Federico, Bandello Francesco

机构信息

1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy.

2 G.B. Bietti Eye Foundation-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;29(1):82-91. doi: 10.1177/1120672118781236. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

: Despite being approved and effective, steroids, and especially dexamethasone intravitreal implants, still have a poorly-defined role in management of diabetic macular edema. In order to overcome some of the limitations in current recommendations, a group of experts met to define consensus on some of the most controversial issues on the use of dexamethasone intravitreal implants in daily management of diabetic macular edema.

METHODS

: A Delphi-based approach was utilized to develop clinically relevant statements applicable to routine treatment settings. A Steering Committee composed of four experts formulated 30 relevant statements, which were voted upon by a panel of 40 ophthalmologists/retinal specialists from across Italy.

RESULTS

: Dexamethasone intravitreal implants were considered to be a valid first-line alternative to treatment with an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent and should be the first choice in pseudophakic and vitrectomized patients. A Pro Re Nata regimen was felt to be appropriate for retreatment with dexamethasone intravitreal implants while a 6-month waiting period was not considered suitable. Among steroid treatments, dexamethasone intravitreal implants were considered to have the best ocular tolerability. In patients with persistent macular edema after the loading-phase treatment with an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, consensus was reached that clinicians should consider switching therapy to dexamethasone intravitreal implants. Moreover, dexamethasone intravitreal implants can reduce the treatment burden for individuals who are not able to cope with the more intensive treatment regimen required by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

: While further studies are needed, this survey provides some key recommendations for clinicians treating diabetic macular edema that may be useful when choosing dexamethasone intravitreal implants in daily practice.

摘要

目的

尽管类固醇药物,尤其是地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂已获批准且有效,但它们在糖尿病性黄斑水肿的治疗中所起的作用仍未明确界定。为克服当前建议中的一些局限性,一组专家齐聚,就地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂在糖尿病性黄斑水肿日常治疗中一些最具争议的问题达成共识。

方法

采用基于德尔菲法的方法制定适用于常规治疗环境的临床相关声明。由四位专家组成的指导委员会制定了30条相关声明,由来自意大利各地的40位眼科医生/视网膜专家组成的小组进行投票。

结果

地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂被认为是抗血管内皮生长因子药物治疗的有效一线替代方案,应作为人工晶状体眼和玻璃体切除术后患者的首选。按需治疗方案被认为适用于地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂的再次治疗,而6个月的等待期则不被认为合适。在类固醇治疗中,地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂被认为具有最佳的眼耐受性。在用抗血管内皮生长因子进行负荷期治疗后仍有持续性黄斑水肿的患者中,已达成共识,临床医生应考虑将治疗转换为地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂。此外,地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂可以减轻那些无法应对抗血管内皮生长因子治疗所需更强化治疗方案的个体的治疗负担。

结论

虽然还需要进一步研究,但这项调查为治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的临床医生提供了一些关键建议,这些建议在日常实践中选择地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂时可能会有所帮助。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验