Electrical and Electronic Engineering, National University of Ireland Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Sensors (Basel). 2018 May 23;18(6):1678. doi: 10.3390/s18061678.
Confocal Microwave Imaging (CMI) for the early detection of breast cancer has been under development for over two decades and is currently going through early-phase clinical evaluation. The image reconstruction algorithm is a key signal processing component of any CMI-based breast imaging system and impacts the efficacy of CMI in detecting breast cancer. Several image reconstruction algorithms for CMI have been developed since its inception. These image reconstruction algorithms have been previously evaluated and compared, using both numerical and physical breast models, and healthy volunteer data. However, no study has been performed to evaluate the performance of image reconstruction algorithms using clinical patient data. In this study, a variety of imaging algorithms, including both data-independent and data-adaptive algorithms, were evaluated using data obtained from a small-scale patient study conducted at the University of Calgary. Six imaging algorithms were applied to reconstruct 3D images of five clinical patients. Reconstructed images for each algorithm and each patient were compared to the available clinical reports, in terms of abnormality detection and localisation. The imaging quality of each algorithm was evaluated using appropriate quality metrics. The results of the conventional Delay-and-Sum algorithm and the Delay-Multiply-and-Sum (DMAS) algorithm were found to be consistent with the clinical information, with DMAS producing better quality images compared to all other algorithms.
共焦微波成像是一种用于早期乳腺癌检测的技术,已经发展了二十多年,目前正在进行早期临床评估。图像重建算法是任何基于共焦微波成像的乳房成像系统的关键信号处理组件,会影响共焦微波成像检测乳腺癌的效果。自共焦微波成像技术诞生以来,已经开发出了几种图像重建算法。这些图像重建算法之前已经使用数值和物理乳房模型以及健康志愿者数据进行了评估和比较。然而,尚未有研究使用临床患者数据来评估图像重建算法的性能。在这项研究中,使用在卡尔加里大学进行的小规模患者研究中获得的数据,评估了多种成像算法,包括数据独立和数据自适应算法。对 5 名临床患者的 3D 图像应用了 6 种成像算法。对每个算法和每个患者的重建图像,根据异常检测和定位情况,与可用的临床报告进行了比较。使用适当的质量指标评估了每个算法的成像质量。结果表明,传统的延时求和算法和延时乘法求和(DMAS)算法与临床信息一致,与所有其他算法相比,DMAS 生成的图像质量更好。