Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep;104(3):470-483. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1131. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
Botanical dietary supplements (BDS) are complex mixtures of phytochemicals exhibiting complex pharmacology and posing complex research challenges. For 25 years, clinical pharmacologists researching BDS have confronted a litany of issues unlike those encountered with conventional medications. Foundational to these concerns is the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, which exempted BDS from premarket safety and efficacy trials. In the ensuing period, safety concerns regarding multi-ingredient products formulated as "proprietary blends" and herb-drug interactions have garnered significant attention. Idiosyncrasies unique to BDS can affect the outcome and interpretation of in vitro and in vivo studies, and although "omics" approaches hold promise in uncovering BDS efficacy mechanisms, purposeful adulteration threatens their safety. Despite a quarter century of public use, healthcare professionals still know little about BDS, thus it falls to industry, government, and academia to join forces in promoting a new paradigm for BDS research and product development.
植物性膳食补充剂 (BDS) 是植物化学物质的复杂混合物,具有复杂的药理学特性,研究起来极具挑战性。25 年来,研究 BDS 的临床药理学家面临着一系列与传统药物不同的问题。这些问题的基础是 1994 年的《膳食补充剂健康与教育法案》,该法案豁免了 BDS 的上市前安全性和疗效试验。在此期间,关于作为“专利混合物”配制的多成分产品的安全性问题和草药-药物相互作用引起了广泛关注。BDS 特有的特殊性会影响体外和体内研究的结果和解释,尽管“组学”方法在揭示 BDS 疗效机制方面具有广阔的前景,但蓄意掺假却威胁到它们的安全性。尽管 BDS 已经被公众使用了四分之一世纪,但医疗保健专业人员对其仍然知之甚少,因此,行业、政府和学术界有必要联合起来,为 BDS 研究和产品开发开创一个新的范例。