Whole Left Ventricular Coverage Versus Conventional 3-Slice Myocardial Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Sliding-window conjugate-gradient highly constrained back-projection reconstruction (SW-CG-HYPR) allows whole left ventricular coverage, improved temporal and spatial resolution, and signal-to-noise ratio compared to the conventional 3-slice saturation recovery turbo-fast low-angle shot (SR-Turbo-FLASH) sequence. We prospectively compared the diagnostic value of whole leftventricular coverage myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conventional 3-slice technique in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients with suspected CAD who were scheduled for coronary angiography underwent myocardial perfusion MRI with both SW-CG-HYPR and SR-Turbo-FLASH in random order at 3.0 T. Perfusion defects were interpreted visually by two blinded observers and were correlated to x-ray angiographic stenoses ≥50%. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was used to compare the diagnostic performance of the two imaging techniques.

RESULTS

The image quality score of SW-CG-HYPR was significantly higher than that of SR-Turbo-FLASH (3.4 ± 0.6 vs 3.0 ± 0.7, respectively; p < 0.05). In the per-patient analysis, SW-CG-HYPR provided a higher sensitivity (94% vs 89%), specificity (83% vs 75%), and diagnostic accuracy (90% vs 83%) for the detection of CAD than SR-Turbo-FLASH. In the per-vessel analysis, the diagnostic performance of SW-CG-HYPR was significantly greater than that of SR-Turbo-FLASH for the overall detection of CAD (area under receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.96 ± 0.02 vs 0.90 ± 0.03, respectively; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Whole left ventricular coverage myocardial perfusion MRI has higher diagnostic accuracy compared to conventional 3-slice technique for the detection of suspected CAD.