Vamberger Melita, Hofmeyr Margaretha D, Ihlow Flora, Fritz Uwe
Museum of Zoology, Senckenberg Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.
PeerJ. 2018 Jun 5;6:e4901. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4901. eCollection 2018.
Based on rangewide sampling and three mitochondrial and two nuclear markers (together up to 1,850 bp and 1,840 bp, respectively), we examine the phylogeography of two helmeted terrapin species ( and sensu stricto) and infer shifts of climatically suitable spaces since the Last Glacial Maximum using a modeling approach. Whilst displays significant phylogeographic structuring across its range and consists of two deeply divergent lineages that could represent distinct species, shows no obvious phylogeographic differentiation. This seems to be related to historically stable or fluctuating ranges. One of the lineages within appears to be confined to the westernmost, winter-rainfall region of South Africa and deserves special conservational attention due to the scarcity of surface water. The other lineage is distributed further east and is differentiated in three weakly supported subclades with parapatric distribution; one occurring inland, and two along the south and east coasts, respectively. As far as is known, occurs in South Africa only in the northeast of the country (Limpopo, Mpumalanga) and we report the species for the first time from the Lapalala Wilderness Area in the Waterberg region (Limpopo), approximately 350 km further west than previously recorded. We confirmed the occurrence of only 80 km south of Lapalala. Thus, a sympatric occurrence of and is possible. Another putative contact zone, for the two lineages within , must be located in the Western Cape region, and further contact zones are likely for the eastern subclades within . The nuclear loci provided no evidence for gene flow across taxa or genetic clusters within taxa. Future investigations should use denser sampling from putative contact zones and more nuclear markers to re-examine this situation. Despite few phylogeographic studies published for southern African biota, it seems likely that differentiation follows general rules, and that climate and physiographic barriers (e.g., the Great Escarpment) have shaped phylogeographic patterns.
基于广泛采样以及三个线粒体标记和两个核标记(分别总计达1850碱基对和1840碱基对),我们研究了两种头盔龟类物种(狭义的 和 )的系统地理学,并使用建模方法推断自末次盛冰期以来气候适宜空间的变化。虽然 在其分布范围内呈现出显著的系统地理结构,由两个深度分化的谱系组成,这两个谱系可能代表不同的物种,但 并未表现出明显的系统地理分化。这似乎与历史上稳定或波动的分布范围有关。 中的一个谱系似乎局限于南非最西部的冬雨区,由于地表水稀缺,值得特别关注。另一个谱系分布在更东部,分化为三个支持度较弱的亚分支,呈邻域分布;一个在内陆,另外两个分别沿着南部和东部海岸。据所知, 仅在南非的东北部(林波波省、姆普马兰加省)出现,我们首次在沃特贝格地区(林波波省)的拉帕拉拉荒野地区报道了该物种,此地比之前记录的地点向西约350公里。我们在拉帕拉拉以南仅80公里处确认了 的存在。因此, 和 有可能同域出现。 的两个谱系的另一个假定接触区必定位于西开普省地区, 东部亚分支可能还有更多接触区。核基因座没有提供跨分类群基因流动或分类群内基因簇的证据。未来的研究应从假定接触区进行更密集的采样,并使用更多核标记来重新审视这种情况。尽管针对南部非洲生物群发表的系统地理学研究较少,但分化似乎遵循一般规律,气候和地理障碍(如大断崖)塑造了系统地理格局。