Varda Danielle M, Williams Malcolm V, Schooley Michael, Duplantier Daniel, Newman Kayleigh, Lowe Beasley Kincaid, Lucido Briana, Marshall Ashley
School of Public Affairs, University of CO Denver, Denver, Colorado (Dr Varda and Ms Newman); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Dr Williams); Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (Messrs Schooley and Lucido, and Mss Beasley and Marshall); and Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, District of Columbia (Mr Duplantier).
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019 Mar/Apr;25(2):156-164. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000781.
To assess the structure, content, quality, and quantity of partnerships that developed in response to a national cardiovascular health initiative, Million Hearts.
This study used a social network analysis (SNA) approach to assess the Million Hearts initiative network partnerships and identify potential implications for policy and practice.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The Million Hearts network comprised a core group of federal and private sector partners that participate in Million Hearts activities and align with initiative priorities. To bound the network for the SNA, we used a list of 58 organizations (74% response rate) from a previously completed qualitative analysis of Million Hearts partnerships.
We used the online PARTNER (Program to Analyze Record and Track Networks to Enhance Relationships-www.partnertool.net) survey to collect data on individual organizational characteristics and relational questions that asked organizations to identify and describe their relationships with other partners in the network. Key SNA measures include network density, centralizations, value, and trust.
Our analyses show a network that is decentralized, has strong perceptions of trust and value among its members, and strong agreement on intended outcomes. Interestingly, partners report a desire and ability to contribute resources to Million Hearts; however, the perceptions between partners are that resources are not being contributed at the level they potentially could be. The majority of partners reported that being in the network helped them achieve their goals related to cardiovascular disease prevention. The largest barrier to successful activities within the network was cited as lack of targeted funding and staff to support participation in the network.
The Million Hearts network described in this article is unique in its membership at the national level, agreement on outcomes, its powerful information-sharing abilities that require few resources, and its decentralized structure. We identified strategies that could be implemented to strengthen the network and its activities. By examining a national-level public-private partnership formed to address a public health issue, we can identify ways to strengthen the network and provide a framework for developing other initiatives.
评估因应一项全国性心血管健康倡议“百万心脏”而形成的伙伴关系的结构、内容、质量和数量。
本研究采用社会网络分析(SNA)方法来评估“百万心脏”倡议网络伙伴关系,并确定对政策和实践的潜在影响。
设置/参与者:“百万心脏”网络由参与“百万心脏”活动并与倡议重点保持一致的联邦和私营部门伙伴核心小组组成。为界定用于社会网络分析的网络,我们使用了一份来自先前完成的对“百万心脏”伙伴关系定性分析的58个组织的清单(回复率74%)。
我们使用在线PARTNER(分析记录和跟踪网络以加强关系的项目 - www.partnertool.net)调查来收集关于各组织个体特征的数据以及关系问题,这些问题要求各组织识别并描述其与网络中其他伙伴的关系。关键的社会网络分析指标包括网络密度、中心性、价值和信任。
我们的分析显示该网络是分散型的,成员之间对信任和价值有强烈认知,对预期成果有高度共识。有趣的是,伙伴们表示有意愿和能力为“百万心脏”贡献资源;然而,伙伴之间的认知是资源没有达到其潜在可贡献的水平。大多数伙伴报告称身处该网络有助于他们实现与心血管疾病预防相关的目标。网络内成功开展活动的最大障碍被认为是缺乏有针对性的资金和人员来支持参与网络。
本文所描述的“百万心脏”网络在其国家层面的成员构成、对成果的共识、强大的信息共享能力(所需资源极少)以及分散型结构方面独具特色。我们确定了可以实施的加强该网络及其活动的策略。通过研究为解决一个公共卫生问题而形成的国家级公私伙伴关系,我们可以确定加强该网络的方法,并为制定其他倡议提供一个框架。