Department of Medicine, Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand.
Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 30;67(10):1543-1549. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy319.
Chloroquine has been recommended for Plasmodium vivax infections for >60 years, but resistance is increasing. To guide future therapies, the cumulative benefits of using slowly eliminated (chloroquine) vs rapidly eliminated (artesunate) antimalarials, and the risks and benefits of adding radical cure (primaquine) were assessed in a 3-way randomized comparison conducted on the Thailand-Myanmar border.
Patients with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria were given artesunate (2 mg/kg/day for 5 days), chloroquine (25 mg base/kg over 3 days), or chloroquine-primaquine (0.5 mg/kg/day for 14 days) and were followed for 1 year. Recurrence rates and their effects on anemia were compared.
Between May 2010 and October 2012, 644 patients were enrolled. Artesunate cleared parasitemia significantly faster than chloroquine. Day 28 recurrence rates were 50% with artesunate (112/224), 8% with chloroquine (18/222; P < .001), and 0.5% with chloroquine-primaquine (1/198; P < .001). Median times to first recurrence were 28 days (interquartile range [IQR], 21-42) with artesunate, 49 days (IQR, 35-74) with chloroquine, and 195 days (IQR, 82-281) with chloroquine-primaquine. Recurrence by day 28, was associated with a mean absolute reduction in hematocrit of 1% (95% confidence interval [CI], .3%-2.0%; P = .009). Primaquine radical cure reduced the total recurrences by 92.4%. One-year recurrence rates were 4.51 (95% CI, 4.19-4.85) per person-year with artesunate, 3.45 (95% CI, 3.18-3.75) with chloroquine (P = .002), and 0.26 (95% CI, .19-.36) with chloroquine-primaquine (P < .001).
Vivax malaria relapses are predominantly delayed by chloroquine but prevented by primaquine.
NCT01074905.
氯喹已被推荐用于治疗间日疟原虫感染超过 60 年,但耐药性正在增加。为了指导未来的治疗,在泰国-缅甸边境进行了一项三向随机对照研究,评估了缓慢消除(氯喹)与快速消除(青蒿琥酯)抗疟药的累积益处,以及添加根治药物(伯氨喹)的风险和益处。
患有无并发症的间日疟原虫感染的患者接受青蒿琥酯(2mg/kg/天,连用 5 天)、氯喹(25mg 碱基/公斤,连用 3 天)或氯喹-伯氨喹(0.5mg/kg/天,连用 14 天)治疗,并随访 1 年。比较复发率及其对贫血的影响。
2010 年 5 月至 2012 年 10 月期间,共纳入 644 例患者。青蒿琥酯清除寄生虫血症的速度明显快于氯喹。第 28 天的复发率分别为青蒿琥酯组 50%(112/224),氯喹组 8%(18/222;P<.001),氯喹-伯氨喹组 0.5%(1/198;P<.001)。第 28 天首次复发的中位时间分别为青蒿琥酯组 28 天(四分位距[IQR],21-42),氯喹组 49 天(IQR,35-74),氯喹-伯氨喹组 195 天(IQR,82-281)。第 28 天的复发与平均绝对红细胞压积下降 1%相关(95%置信区间[CI],.3%-2.0%;P=.009)。伯氨喹根治可使总复发率降低 92.4%。青蒿琥酯组的 1 年复发率为 4.51(95%CI,4.19-4.85)/人年,氯喹组为 3.45(95%CI,3.18-3.75)(P=.002),氯喹-伯氨喹组为 0.26(95%CI,.19-.36)(P<.001)。
间日疟原虫的复发主要是由氯喹延迟引起的,但可以通过伯氨喹预防。
NCT01074905。