Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):115-121. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002644.
To describe the relationship between a short interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes in the population undergoing assisted reproductive technology.
This is a retrospective analysis using data from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System. The cohort includes patients with a history of live birth from assisted reproductive technology who returned for a fresh, autologous in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle from 2004 to 2013. Interpregnancy interval was defined as the interval from live birth to cycle start. Logistic regression models of preterm delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) and low birth weight (less than 2,500 g) on interpregnancy interval were fit with adjustment for age, body mass index, and history of preterm delivery. Predicted probabilities were generated from the logistic model.
Of 51,997 fresh IVF cycles after an index live birth, 17,536 resulted in a repeat live birth with 11,271 singleton live births from autologous IVF. An interpregnancy interval of less than 18 months occurred in 40.9% of cycles. Compared with a reference interpregnancy interval of 12 to less than 18 months, the adjusted odds ratio for singleton preterm delivery was 1.66 (95% CI 1.05-2.65) for an interpregnancy interval less than 6 months and 1.34 (95% CI 1.06-1.69) for 6 to less than 12 months. An interpregnancy interval 6 to less than 12 months was associated with a 3.0% increase in preterm delivery (13.6±1.1% vs 10.6±0.7%, P=.030) and a 2.7% increase in low birth weight (8.0±0.9% vs 5.3±0.5%, P=.025) compared with an interpregnancy interval of 12 to less than 18 months.
In this nationally representative population, an interval from delivery to treatment start of less than 12 months is associated with increased rates of preterm delivery and low birth weight in singleton live births from assisted reproductive technology. The data support delaying the start of IVF treatment 12 months from a live birth, but do not suggest a benefit from a longer interval as has been recommended for naturally conceiving couples.
描述辅助生殖技术人群中短间隔妊娠与不良妊娠结局之间的关系。
这是一项使用 2004 年至 2013 年辅助生殖技术协会临床结果报告系统数据进行的回顾性分析。该队列包括有活产史并返回进行新鲜自体体外受精(IVF)周期的患者。妊娠间隔定义为活产至周期开始的间隔。使用 logistic 回归模型对早产(<37 周)和低出生体重(<2500g)与妊娠间隔的关系进行拟合,并调整年龄、体重指数和早产史。从 logistic 模型生成预测概率。
在 51997 个新鲜 IVF 周期中,有 17536 个周期导致重复活产,其中 11271 个为自体 IVF 的单胎活产。18 个月内的妊娠间隔不到 40.9%。与 12 至<18 个月的参考妊娠间隔相比,妊娠间隔<6 个月的单胎早产调整比值比为 1.66(95%CI 1.05-2.65),6 至<12 个月的为 1.34(95%CI 1.06-1.69)。妊娠间隔为 6 至<12 个月与早产率增加 3.0%(13.6±1.1%比 10.6±0.7%,P=.030)和低出生体重增加 2.7%(8.0±0.9%比 5.3±0.5%,P=.025)相关,与 12 至<18 个月的妊娠间隔相比。
在这个具有全国代表性的人群中,从分娩到治疗开始的间隔不到 12 个月与辅助生殖技术中单胎活产的早产率和低出生体重率增加有关。数据支持将 IVF 治疗从活产开始推迟 12 个月,但不支持建议自然受孕夫妇间隔时间更长,以带来获益。