• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妊娠间隔与不良分娩结局的家庭内分析

Within-Family Analysis of Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Birth Outcomes.

作者信息

Class Quetzal A, Rickert Martin E, Oberg Anna S, Sujan Ayesha C, Almqvist Catarina, Larsson Henrik, Lichtenstein Paul, D'Onofrio Brian M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois, Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana; and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, and the Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonology Unit at Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1304-1311. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002358.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002358
PMID:29112654
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5783305/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine associations among interpregnancy interval, the duration from the preceding birth to the conception of the next-born index child, and adverse birth outcomes using designs that adjust for measured and unmeasured factors.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, we used population-based Swedish registries from 1973 to 2009 to estimate the associations between interpregnancy interval (referent 18-23 months) and adverse birth outcomes (ie, preterm birth [less than 37 weeks of gestation], low birth weight [LBW; less than 2,500 g], small for gestational age [SGA; greater than 2 SDs below average weight for gestational age]). Analyses included cousin and sibling comparisons and postbirth intervals (ie, the interval between secondborn and thirdborn offspring predicting secondborn outcomes) to address unmeasured familial confounding.

RESULTS

Traditional cohort-wide analyses showed higher odds of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.51, 99% CI 1.39-1.63, 5.99% preterm births]) and LBW (adjusted OR 1.25, 99% CI 1.13-1.39, 3.32% LBW) after a short interpregnancy interval (0-5 months) compared with offspring born after an interpregnancy interval of 18-23 months (3.21% preterm births, 1.92% LBW). Except for preterm birth (adjusted OR 1.72, 99% CI 1.26-2.35), associations were attenuated in cousin comparisons. A small association between a short interpregnancy interval and preterm birth remained in sibling comparisons (adjusted OR 1.22, 99% CI 1.11-1.35), but associations with LBW (adjusted OR 0.83, 99% CI 0.74-0.94) and SGA (adjusted OR 0.74, 99% CI 0.64-0.85) reversed direction. For pregnancy intervals of 60 months or more, odds of preterm birth (adjusted OR 1.51, 99% CI 1.43-1.60, 5.07% preterm births), LBW (adjusted OR 1.61, 99% CI 1.50-1.73, 3.43% low-birth-weight births), and SGA (adjusted OR 1.54, 99% CI 1.42-1.66, 2.49% SGA births) were also higher when compared with the reference interval (1.53% SGA). Associations between long interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes remained through cousin and sibling comparisons. Postbirth interval analyses showed familial confounding is present for short interpregnancy intervals, but supported independent associations for long interpregnancy intervals.

CONCLUSION

Familial confounding explains most of the association between a short interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes, whereas associations with long interpregnancy intervals were independent of measured and unmeasured factors.

摘要

目的

采用对测量因素和未测量因素进行校正的设计,研究妊娠间隔、前次分娩到本次出生索引儿童受孕的时间间隔与不良分娩结局之间的关联。

方法

在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们使用了1973年至2009年基于人群的瑞典登记数据,以估计妊娠间隔(参照组为18 - 23个月)与不良分娩结局(即早产[妊娠少于37周]、低出生体重[LBW;少于2500克]、小于胎龄儿[SGA;低于胎龄平均体重2个标准差以上])之间的关联。分析包括堂兄弟姐妹和同胞比较以及产后间隔(即预测次胎结局的二胎和三胎后代之间的间隔),以解决未测量的家族性混杂因素。

结果

传统的全队列分析显示,与妊娠间隔为18 - 23个月后出生的后代(早产率3.21%,低出生体重率1.92%)相比,妊娠间隔短(0 - 5个月)后早产(校正优势比[OR]1.51,99%CI 1.39 - 1.63,早产率5.99%)和低出生体重(校正OR 1.25,99%CI 1.13 - 1.39,低出生体重率3.32%)的几率更高。除早产外(校正OR 1.72,99%CI 1.26 - 2.35),堂兄弟姐妹比较中关联减弱。同胞比较中,妊娠间隔短与早产之间仍存在小的关联(校正OR 1.22,99%CI 1.11 - 1.35),但与低出生体重(校正OR 0.83,99%CI 0.74 - 0.94)和小于胎龄儿(校正OR 0.74,99%CI 0.64 - 0.85)的关联方向相反。对于妊娠间隔60个月或更长时间,与参照间隔(小于胎龄儿率1.53%)相比,早产(校正OR 1.51, 99%CI 1.43 - 1.60,早产率5.07%)、低出生体重(校正OR 1.61, 99%CI 1.50 - 1.73,低出生体重率3.43%)和小于胎龄儿(校正OR 1.54,99%CI 1.42 - 1.66,小于胎龄儿率2.49%)的几率也更高。妊娠间隔长与不良分娩结局之间的关联在堂兄弟姐妹和同胞比较中仍然存在。产后间隔分析显示,妊娠间隔短存在家族性混杂因素,但支持妊娠间隔长的独立关联。

结论

家族性混杂因素解释了妊娠间隔短与不良分娩结局之间的大部分关联,而妊娠间隔长与不良分娩结局的关联独立于测量因素和未测量因素。

相似文献

1
Within-Family Analysis of Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Birth Outcomes.妊娠间隔与不良分娩结局的家庭内分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1304-1311. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002358.
2
Association of Interpregnancy Interval With Adverse Birth Outcomes.妊娠间隔与不良分娩结局的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2216658. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16658.
3
Outcome-dependent associations between short interpregnancy interval and offspring psychological and educational problems: a population-based quasi-experimental study.生育间隔与子女心理和教育问题之间的结局依赖性关联:基于人群的准实验研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 1;47(4):1159-1168. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy042.
4
Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: A Record-Linkage Study Using the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository.妊娠间隔与不良围产期结局:一项使用曼尼托巴人口研究数据存储库的记录链接研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Jun;39(6):420-433. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
5
Relationship Between Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes in Northern Alberta.加拿大艾伯塔省北部两次妊娠间隔与不良围产期和新生儿结局的关系
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Jul;37(7):598-605. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30197-3.
6
Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies.妊娠间隔与不良妊娠结局:连续妊娠分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;129(3):408-415. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001891.
7
Re-evaluation of link between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes: retrospective cohort study matching two intervals per mother.再次评估妊娠间隔与不良分娩结局之间的关联:对每位母亲匹配两个间隔的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2014 Jul 23;349:g4333. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4333.
8
Maternal prescribed opioid analgesic use during pregnancy and associations with adverse birth outcomes: A population-based study.母亲在怀孕期间使用处方类阿片类镇痛药与不良出生结局的关联:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 2;16(12):e1002980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002980. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse pregnancy outcomes by maternal age in the United States.美国的母婴年龄与妊娠间隔时间短和不良妊娠结局。
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;31:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
10
Interpregnancy Interval After Termination of Pregnancy and the Risks of Adverse Outcomes in Subsequent Birth.妊娠终止后至再次妊娠的间隔时间与后续分娩不良结局的风险。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;129(2):347-354. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001836.

引用本文的文献

1
Geospatial analysis of area-level social and behavioral factors associated with short interpregnancy intervals in North Carolina, U.S.美国北卡罗来纳州与短生育间隔相关的地区层面社会和行为因素的地理空间分析
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Aug 22;58:103216. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103216. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes according to maternal age in the context of China's two-child policy.在中国二孩政策背景下,妊娠间隔与不同孕产妇年龄的不良围产期结局之间的关联。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07136-8.
3
Interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes: A within-individual comparative method.

本文引用的文献

1
Interpregnancy Interval and Pregnancy Outcomes: Causal or Not?妊娠间隔与妊娠结局:是否存在因果关系?
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;129(3):405-407. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001913.
2
Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies.妊娠间隔与不良妊娠结局:连续妊娠分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;129(3):408-415. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001891.
3
Another Frontier in Microbiome Research: Preterm Birth.微生物组研究的另一个前沿领域:早产。
妊娠间隔与不良围产期结局:一种个体内比较方法。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 19;7(8):e2313. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2313. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes: a population-based cohort study of twins.妊娠间隔与不良出生结局:一项基于人群的双胞胎队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 31;24(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06119-x.
5
Birth spacing and risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.生育间隔与不良妊娠和出生结局风险:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Dec;102(12):1618-1633. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14648. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
6
Subnational variations in electricity access and infant mortality: Evidence from Ghana.加纳地方层面的电力供应与婴儿死亡率差异:证据分析
Health Policy Open. 2021 Dec 2;3:100057. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100057. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Interactions between long interpregnancy interval and advanced maternal age on neonatal outcomes.孕间期延长与高龄产妇对新生儿结局的相互作用。
World J Pediatr. 2023 Dec;19(12):1155-1161. doi: 10.1007/s12519-023-00728-4. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
8
Association between interpregnancy interval and maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in women with a cesarean delivery: a population-based study.剖宫产术后再次妊娠间隔与母婴不良结局的相关性:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 25;23(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05600-x.
9
Weighting of risk factors for low birth weight: a linked routine data cohort study in Wales, UK.出生体重偏低相关因素的权重:英国威尔士基于关联常规数据队列的研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 10;13(2):e063836. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063836.
10
Short interpregnancy interval can lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes: A meta-analysis.妊娠间隔过短会导致不良妊娠结局:一项荟萃分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 30;9:922053. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.922053. eCollection 2022.
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1550-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.11563.
4
Proceeding From Observed Correlation to Causal Inference: The Use of Natural Experiments.从观察相关性到因果推断:自然实验的应用。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;2(4):377-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00050.x.
5
Re-evaluation of link between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes: retrospective cohort study matching two intervals per mother.再次评估妊娠间隔与不良分娩结局之间的关联:对每位母亲匹配两个间隔的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2014 Jul 23;349:g4333. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4333.
6
Critical need for family-based, quasi-experimental designs in integrating genetic and social science research.迫切需要基于家庭的准实验设计来整合遗传和社会科学研究。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Oct;103 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S46-55. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301252. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
7
Effects of birth spacing on maternal, perinatal, infant, and child health: a systematic review of causal mechanisms.出生间隔对母婴、围产儿、婴儿和儿童健康的影响:因果机制的系统评价。
Stud Fam Plann. 2012 Jun;43(2):93-114. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2012.00308.x.
8
Interpregnancy interval and obstetrical complications.妊娠间隔与产科并发症。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012 Sep;67(9):584-96. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31826b2c3e.
9
Prenatal care and subsequent birth intervals.产前保健和随后的生育间隔。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Mar;44(1):13-21. doi: 10.1363/4401312. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
10
The role of mental health factors, behavioral factors, and past experiences in the prediction of rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescence.心理健康因素、行为因素及过往经历在预测青少年快速再次怀孕中的作用。
J Adolesc Health. 2009 Jan;44(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.06.003. Epub 2008 Oct 18.