Department of Medicine, SUNY (State University of New York), Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 11;13(6):e0198809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198809. eCollection 2018.
There is limited literature about the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of rare histologic variants of gallbladder cancer (GBC).
Using SEER database, surgically managed GBC patients with microscopically confirmed adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous/squamous cell carcinoma and papillary carcinoma were identified from 1988 to 2009. Patients with second primary cancer and distant metastasis at presentation were excluded. The effect of clinicopathological variables on overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate proportional hazards modeling. All associations were considered statistically significant at an alpha error of 0.01.
Out of 4738 cases, 217 adenosquamous/squamous (4.6%), 367 papillary (7.7%), and 4154 adenocarcinomas (87.7%) were identified. Median age was 72 years. Higher tumor grade (grade 2, 3, 4 versus grade 1), higher T stage (T2, T3, T4 versus T1), lymph node positivity (N1 versus N0) and adenosquamous/squamous histology (versus adenocarcinoma) had worse OS and DSS (p < .001). Papillary GBC had better OS and DSS than adenocarcinoma (HR = 0.7; p < .001). Radical surgery (versus simple cholecystectomy) had better OS (HR = 0.83, p = 0.002) in multivariate analysis. OS rates at 3 and 5 years were 0.56 and 0.44 for papillary, 0.3 and 0.22 for adenocarcinoma, and 0.14 and 0.12 for adenosquamous/squamous histology, while DSS rates at 3 and 5 years were 0.67 and 0.61 for papillary, 0.38 and 0.31 for adenocarcinoma, and 0.17 and 0.16 for adenosquamous/squamous subtypes respectively.
Papillary GBC had better survival outcomes while adenosquamous/squamous GBC had worse survival outcomes compared to gallbladder adenocarcinoma.
关于胆囊癌(GBC)罕见组织学亚型的临床病理特征和结局,文献报道有限。
利用 SEER 数据库,从 1988 年至 2009 年,筛选出经显微镜证实为腺癌、腺鳞/鳞状细胞癌和乳头状癌的接受手术治疗的 GBC 患者。排除有第二原发癌和初次诊断时远处转移的患者。采用单变量和多变量比例风险模型分析临床病理变量对总生存期(OS)和疾病特异性生存期(DSS)的影响。所有关联均以 alpha 错误为 0.01 时具有统计学意义。
在 4738 例患者中,217 例为腺鳞/鳞状(4.6%),367 例为乳头状(7.7%),4154 例为腺癌(87.7%)。中位年龄为 72 岁。较高的肿瘤分级(2、3、4 级比 1 级)、较高的 T 分期(T2、T3、T4 比 T1)、淋巴结阳性(N1 比 N0)和腺鳞/鳞状组织学(比腺癌)与较差的 OS 和 DSS 相关(p<0.001)。与腺癌相比,乳头状 GBC 具有更好的 OS 和 DSS(HR=0.7;p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,根治性手术(与单纯胆囊切除术相比)具有更好的 OS(HR=0.83,p=0.002)。3 年和 5 年的 OS 率分别为 0.56 和 0.44 为乳头状癌,0.3 和 0.22 为腺癌,0.14 和 0.12 为腺鳞/鳞状癌,而 3 年和 5 年的 DSS 率分别为 0.67 和 0.61 为乳头状癌,0.38 和 0.31 为腺癌,0.17 和 0.16 为腺鳞/鳞状癌。
与胆囊腺癌相比,乳头状 GBC 的生存结局更好,而腺鳞/鳞状 GBC 的生存结局更差。