• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解释办公室工作人员身体行为的潜在因素——探索性分析。

Underlying Factors Explaining Physical Behaviors among Office Workers-An Exploratory Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.

Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 8;17(24):9158. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249158.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17249158
PMID:33302452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7763999/
Abstract

Studies using technical measurements of physical behavior show wide interindividual variations. This study aimed to explore underlying factors related to sitting, standing and walking among office workers. Cross-sectional data for background characteristics, work-related variables, and device-based measures for sitting, standing and walking were collected among office workers in either a cell office or a flex office with activity-based work. Data were analyzed by Factor Analysis of Mixed Data (FAMD) and multiple robust linear regression. The FAMD resulted in the combination of underlying factors describing six character types. The (1) harmonic and healthy, (2) disabled with poor health, (3) manager that spend a lot of time in meetings and has very high workload, (4) engaged with high workload, (5) employee with creative and computer intense work, with high workload and, (6) employee with high BMI with creative and collaborative work. Regression analysis showed that the character type that was "engaged with high workload" sat more and stood less, while the character type with "high BMI and with creative and collaborative work" sat less. The results suggest that physical behavior among office workers is influenced by a complex combination of factors, which should be taken into account in the evaluation of future studies of larger cohorts.

摘要

使用身体行为的技术测量进行的研究表明个体间存在广泛的差异。本研究旨在探索与办公人员的坐姿、站姿和步行有关的潜在因素。在采用基于活动的工作方式的细胞办公室或灵活办公室中,收集了办公人员的背景特征、与工作相关的变量以及基于设备的坐姿、站姿和步行测量的横断面数据。通过混合数据因子分析(FAMD)和多元稳健线性回归对数据进行分析。FAMD 得出了描述六种特征类型的潜在因素的组合。这些特征类型包括:(1)和谐健康型,(2)身体残疾且健康状况不佳型,(3)经理型,他们经常开会且工作量很大,(4)投入型,工作量很大,(5)从事创造性和计算机密集型工作且工作量大的员工,(6)BMI 高且从事创造性和协作性工作的员工。回归分析表明,“投入且工作量大”的特征类型的人坐得更多,站得更少,而“BMI 高且从事创造性和协作性工作”的特征类型的人坐得更少。结果表明,办公人员的身体行为受到多种因素的复杂组合的影响,在评估更大队列的未来研究时应考虑这些因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f87/7763999/4d65e0e0872f/ijerph-17-09158-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f87/7763999/4d65e0e0872f/ijerph-17-09158-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f87/7763999/4d65e0e0872f/ijerph-17-09158-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Underlying Factors Explaining Physical Behaviors among Office Workers-An Exploratory Analysis.解释办公室工作人员身体行为的潜在因素——探索性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 8;17(24):9158. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249158.
2
Moving to an "Active" Biophilic Designed Office Workplace: A Pilot Study about the Effects on Sitting Time and Sitting Habits of Office-Based Workers.从“被动式”办公环境到“主动式”亲生物设计办公环境的转变:一项关于办公人群久坐时间和久坐习惯的影响的试点研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 4;16(9):1559. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091559.
3
What strategies do desk-based workers choose to reduce sitting time and how well do they work? Findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial.久坐办公族选择了哪些策略来减少久坐时间,这些策略效果如何?一项整群随机对照试验的结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Oct 12;15(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0731-z.
4
Standing Meetings Are Feasible and Effective in Reducing Sitting Time among Office Workers-Walking Meetings Are Not: Mixed-Methods Results on the Feasibility and Effectiveness of Active Meetings Based on Data from the "Take a Stand!" Study.站立会议在减少上班族久坐时间方面是可行且有效的——而走步会议并非如此:基于“采取行动!”研究数据的关于积极会议可行性和有效性的混合方法研究结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 5;17(5):1713. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051713.
5
The occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ): a validation study with accelerometer-assessed measures.职业坐姿和体力活动问卷 (OSPAQ):一项使用加速度计评估测量的验证研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 6;20(1):1072. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09180-9.
6
Associations between the Objectively Measured Office Environment and Workplace Step Count and Sitting Time: Cross-Sectional Analyses from the Active Buildings Study.客观测量的办公环境与工作场所步数和久坐时间的关联:来自积极建筑研究的横断面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 1;15(6):1135. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061135.
7
Occupational sitting time, its determinants and intervention strategies in Malaysian office workers: a mixed-methods study.马来西亚办公室职员的职业久坐时间、其决定因素及干预策略:一项混合方法研究。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Apr 29;37(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab149.
8
Associations of Device-Measured Sitting, Standing, and Stepping Time With Informal Face-to-Face Interactions at Work.设备测量的坐、站和踏步时间与工作中非正式面对面互动的关联。
J Occup Environ Med. 2019 May;61(5):431-436. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001586.
9
Physical activity and sitting time in occupational groups from Papua New Guinea.巴布亚新几内亚职业人群中的体力活动和久坐时间。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022 Apr;95(3):621-628. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01796-7. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
10
Self-reported actual and desired proportion of sitting, standing, walking and physically demanding tasks of office employees in the workplace setting: do they fit together?职场环境中办公室员工自我报告的坐、站、行走及体力要求较高任务的实际和期望比例:它们相符吗?
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Nov 17;10(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2829-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Anti-Ma2 Antibody-Associated Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes: A Pilot Study.抗Ma2抗体相关副肿瘤性神经系统综合征:一项初步研究。
Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 29;11(12):1577. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11121577.
2
Sedentary Behavior and Associated Factors Among Working Adults in Eastern Ethiopia.东非地区工作成年人的久坐行为及相关因素。
Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 7;9:693176. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.693176. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Sitting, standing and moving during work and leisure among male and female office workers of different age: a compositional data analysis.不同年龄的男女上班族在工作和休闲时的坐姿、站姿和活动情况:组合数据分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08909-w.
2
Implementing a Physical Activity Promoting Program in a Flex-Office: A Process Evaluation with a Mixed Methods Design.在弹性办公环境中实施促进身体活动的计划:一项采用混合方法设计的过程评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 18;17(1):23. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010023.
3
Effects of a multicomponent physical activity promoting program on sedentary behavior, physical activity and body measures: a longitudinal study in different office types.
多成分身体活动促进方案对久坐行为、身体活动和身体测量的影响:不同办公类型的纵向研究。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Sep 1;45(5):493-504. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3808. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
4
Workplace health beliefs concerning physical activity and sedentary behaviour.工作场所与身体活动和久坐行为有关的健康信念。
Occup Med (Lond). 2018 Dec 26;68(9):631-634. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqy143.
5
Considerations when using the activPAL monitor in field-based research with adult populations.在针对成年人群体的实地研究中使用activPAL监测仪时的注意事项。
J Sport Health Sci. 2017 Jun;6(2):162-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
6
Treadmill workstations in office workers who are overweight or obese: a randomised controlled trial.超重或肥胖的办公人员使用跑步机工作站:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Nov;3(11):e523-e535. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30163-4. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
7
Effectiveness of the Stand More AT (SMArT) Work intervention: cluster randomised controlled trial.站立更多 AT(SMArT)工作干预的有效性: 集群随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2018 Oct 10;363:k3870. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3870.
8
The development, implementation and evaluation of interventions to reduce workplace sitting: a qualitative systematic review and evidence-based operational framework.干预措施的制定、实施和评估以减少工作场所久坐:定性系统评价和基于证据的操作框架。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 4;18(1):833. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5768-z.
9
Occupational Physical Activity Habits of UK Office Workers: Cross-Sectional Data from the Active Buildings Study.英国上班族的职业体力活动习惯:来自活跃建筑研究的横断面数据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 9;15(6):1214. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061214.
10
Common Perceived Barriers and Facilitators for Reducing Sedentary Behaviour among Office Workers.减少上班族久坐行为的常见认知障碍和促进因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 18;15(4):792. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040792.