Zheng Xu-Xin, Xu Sheng-Yu, Chen Rui-Zhi, Yu Ming, Huang Jing-Cheng, Yao Wei-Bing, Qiu Bo
Department of Orthopaedics, the People's Hospital of Jinhua, Jinhua 321100, Zhejiang, China;
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 May 25;31(5):400-407. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.05.002.
To compare clinical efficacy of repositioning with precise-surgical-opening intramedullary nail insertion and traditional repositioning in treating unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures with closed-reposition difficulty.
Clinical data of 58 patients with unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures after closed-reposition difficulty (AO 31A2.2-3.3) were retrospective analyzed. Among them, 32 patients were treated with first open intramedullary nail and then reduction operation(modified reductuon group) including 9 males and 23 females with an average age of (80.9±11.1) years old ranging from 46 to 99 years old; and 26 patients were treated by traditional reduction(traditional reduction group) including 7 males and 19 females with an average of(78.1±13.9) years old ranging from 41 to 89 years old. The time of operation, the amount of bleeding, the length of hospital stay, the first weight-bearing time and the time of fracture healing, postoperative complications and Harris hip score were evaluated and compared between the two groups.
All patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months with an average of 17.3 months. The operative time(3.612, 0.008 2) nd the blood loss(3.389, 0.007 5) in the modified reduction group were lower than those in the traditional reduction group. There were no significant differences in hospitalization time(0.851, 0.392), fracture healing time(0.640, 0.531), and the first loading time(0.845, 0.411) between two groups. There was no significant difference in the Harris score between two groups(χ²=0.66, 0.831>0.05).
Traditional repositioning requires a repositioning of the fracture bone and a correct opening reaming before the insertion and fixture of the intramedullary nail, which is a complicated operation in unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures after closed-reposition difficulty. On the other hand, the new method implements the insertion of the intramedullary nail before the repositioning of the fracture bone, greatly simplifying the operation procedure, shortening the total operation time and reducing the amount of intraoperative blood loss.
比较闭合复位困难的不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折采用精准手术开口髓内钉置入复位与传统复位的临床疗效。
回顾性分析58例闭合复位困难的不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折(AO 31A2.2 - 3.3)患者的临床资料。其中,32例患者先行切开髓内钉置入再行复位手术(改良复位组),男9例,女23例,平均年龄(80.9±11.1)岁,年龄范围46至99岁;26例患者采用传统复位(传统复位组),男7例,女19例,平均年龄(78.1±13.9)岁,年龄范围41至89岁。评估并比较两组患者的手术时间、出血量、住院时间、首次负重时间、骨折愈合时间、术后并发症及Harris髋关节评分。
所有患者均随访12至24个月,平均17.3个月。改良复位组的手术时间(3.612,0.008 2)和失血量(3.389,0.007 5)低于传统复位组。两组患者在住院时间(0.851,0.392)、骨折愈合时间(0.640,0.531)及首次负重时间(0.845,0.411)方面差异无统计学意义。两组患者Harris评分差异无统计学意义(χ² = 0.66,0.831>0.05)。
传统复位在髓内钉置入和固定前需要对骨折断端进行复位及正确的开口扩髓,对于闭合复位困难的不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折来说是一项复杂的手术。另一方面,新方法在骨折断端复位前先置入髓内钉,极大地简化了手术操作程序,缩短了总手术时间并减少了术中出血量。