Guo Xue-Feng, Zhang Ke-Ming, Fu Hong-Bo, Cao Wen, Dong Qiang
Department of Traumatic Orthopaedics, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China.
Chin J Traumatol. 2015;18(6):332-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.12.001.
To compare the clinical effects of long vs. short intramedullary nails in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in old patients more than 65 years old.
A retrospective analysis of 178 cases of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur (AO type A1 and A2) in the elderly was conducted from January 2008 to December 2013. There were 85 males (47.8%) and 93 females (52.2%) with the age of 65e89 (70.2±10.8) years. The patients were treated by closed reduction and long or short intramedullary nail (Gamma 3) fixation. The length of short nail was 180 mm and that for long nail was 320e360 mm. The general data of patients, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, preoperative hemoglobin level, blood transfusion rate, postoperative periprosthetic fractures, infections, complications, etc were carefully recorded.
There were 76 cases (42.7%) in the long intramedullary nail group and 102 cases (57.3%) in the short nail group. All the cases were followed up for 12e48 (21.3±6.8) months, during which there were 21 deaths (11.8%), mean (13.8±6.9) months after operation. The intraoperative blood loss was (90.7±50.6) ml in short nail group, greatly less than that in long nail group (127.8±85.9) ml (p=0.004). The short nail group also had a significantly shorter operation time (43.5 min±12.3 min vs. 58.5 min±20.3 min, p=0.002) and lower rate of postoperative transfusion (42.3% vs. 56.7%, p=0.041). But the length of hospital stay showed no big differences. After operation, in each group there was 1 case of periprosthetic fracture with a total incidence of 1.1%, 1.3% in long nail group and 0.9% in short nail group. At the end of the follow-up, all patients achieved bony union. The average healing time of the long nail group was (6.5±3.1) months, and the short nail group was (6.8±3.7) months, revealing no significant differences (p=0.09). Postoperative complications showed no great differences either.
Both the intramedullary long and short nail fixation has a good clinical effect in treating intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly. They showed no significant difference in terms of therapeutic effect, hospital stay and postoperative complications. The incidence of periprosthetic fractures treated by either length of nails was low. But short intramedullary nailing can obviously decrease the intraoperative blood loss, operation time and postoperative blood transfusion.
比较长髓内钉与短髓内钉治疗65岁以上老年患者股骨转子间骨折的临床效果。
回顾性分析2008年1月至2013年12月期间178例老年股骨转子间骨折(AO A1型和A2型)患者。其中男性85例(47.8%),女性93例(52.2%),年龄65 - 89岁(70.2±10.8岁)。患者均采用闭合复位及长或短髓内钉(Gamma 3)固定治疗。短钉长度为180 mm,长钉长度为320 - 360 mm。仔细记录患者的一般资料、手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、术前血红蛋白水平、输血率、术后假体周围骨折、感染、并发症等情况。
长髓内钉组76例(42.7%),短钉组102例(57.3%)。所有病例均随访12 - 48个月(21.3±6.8个月),随访期间死亡21例(11.8%),平均术后(13.8±6.9)个月。短钉组术中出血量为(90.7±50.6)ml,显著少于长钉组(127.8±85.9)ml(p = 0.004)。短钉组手术时间也显著更短(43.5 min±12.3 min对58.5 min±20.3 min,p = 0.002),术后输血率更低(42.3%对56.7%,p = 0.041)。但住院时间差异不大。术后每组各有1例假体周围骨折,总发生率为1.1%,长钉组为1.3%,短钉组为0.9%。随访结束时,所有患者均达到骨愈合。长钉组平均愈合时间为(6.5±3.1)个月,短钉组为(6.8±3.7)个月,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.09)。术后并发症差异也不大。
长、短髓内钉固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折均有良好的临床效果。在治疗效果、住院时间及术后并发症方面差异无统计学意义。两种长度髓内钉治疗的假体周围骨折发生率均较低。但短髓内钉固定可明显减少术中出血量、手术时间及术后输血。