1 New York City College of Technology, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Qual Health Res. 2018 Aug;28(10):1610-1620. doi: 10.1177/1049732318776625. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
In the last 20 years, qualitative research scholars have begun to interrogate methodological and analytic issues concerning online research settings as both data sources and instruments for digital methods. This article examines the adaptation of parts of a qualitative research curriculum for understanding online communication settings. I propose methodological best practices for researchers and educators that I developed while teaching research methods to undergraduate and graduate students across disciplinary departments and discuss obstacles faced during my own research while gathering data from online sources. This article confronts issues concerning the disembodied aspects of applying what in practice should be rooted in a humanistic inquiry. Furthermore, as some approaches to online qualitative research as a digital method grow increasingly problematic with the development of new data mining technologies, I will also briefly touch upon borderline ethical practices involving data-scraping-based qualitative research.
在过去的 20 年中,定性研究学者开始探讨与在线研究环境相关的方法论和分析问题,因为这些环境既是数据来源,也是数字方法的工具。本文考察了适应定性研究课程的部分内容,以了解在线交流环境。我为研究人员和教育工作者提出了一些方法上的最佳实践,这些实践是我在跨学科部门向本科生和研究生教授研究方法时开发的,并讨论了在从在线资源收集数据时我自己的研究中遇到的障碍。本文直面了一些问题,这些问题涉及到在实践中应该扎根于人文探究的非实体方面。此外,随着新的数据挖掘技术的发展,一些在线定性研究作为数字方法的方法越来越成问题,我也将简要地探讨涉及基于数据挖掘的定性研究的边缘伦理实践。