Darves-Bornoz J-M
Unité ambulatoire de psychiatrie de liaison, hôpital Beaujon (Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), 100, boulevard du Général-Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France.
Encephale. 2018 Nov;44(5):471-475. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
In the title of this text, by somatic disorders we mean those physical illnesses clearly related to a non-psychiatric medical field, frequently termed psychosomatic illnesses and somatoform disorders. For forty years, a trend of thought has focused with pertinence on the psychological peculiarities in patients with severe somatic diseases. Moreover, causality was often supposed in the regularly mentioned association between personality features and somatoform disorders. However, the revival of the study of the earlier field of relationships between mind and body by Briquet, Charcot, Janet and Freud in his first period has led to the reassessment of the meaning of these observations. This reexamination is marked out by several assertions. Two of them work as preliminaries to argumentation: 1. existential wounds may produce long-lasting personality alterations; 2. existential wounds may produce somatoform disorders. These phenomena have been rediscovered over the last few years among assaulted subjects as well as war veterans in whom a frequent occurrence of somatizations has been, in addition, closely linked to the incidence of behavior or personality disorders. Two theses then emerge: 1. somatic diseases may produce long-lasting personality alterations; 2. until now no premorbid personality univocally predisposing to somatic diseases could be found. Indeed, during the 1980s a growing body of negative results coming from retrospective and prospective studies as well as anatomical comparisons have accumulated upon the potential role of certain personality factors in the incidence of somatic illnesses. This dialectic leads to the connection of two corollary assertions: 1. "pensée opératoire" and "alexithymia" in patients with somatic diseases may represent only an effect of the announcement or chronicity of the organic disease; 2. the old "dissociative hysteria" with somatic manifestations finds its substratum in existential wounds and not in pre-trauma personality. Indeed, on the one hand, recent publications do not allow the assertion to be confirmed that alexithymia and "pensée opératoire" predispose to somatizations. On the other hand, personality disorders in subjects with "dissociative hysteria" as well as their somatoform symptoms appear mainly as an effect of an existential wound and express in fact the Janetian concept of "a drop in Psychological Tension". Then, in spite of their differences, conversion and psychosomatic symptoms share the property of being a primitive response to existential wounds in which the subject cannot produce any appropriate psychic or behavioral response to his distress. Light is shed on these phenomena when put alongside the field of "fixed ideas" thought of by Pierre Janet as the recourse to archaic automatisms. Indeed, the experience which contradicts the vision of existence provokes an "unspeakable terror". It is mentally unrepresented or represented in too slight a way. In such cases, no previous personality prevails, but the resulting personality often appears modified, including when the breakdown of vision of the existence results from the diagnosis of an illness or its protracted course.
在本文标题中,我们所说的躯体障碍是指那些与非精神医学领域明显相关的身体疾病,常被称为身心疾病和躯体形式障碍。四十年来,一种思潮一直恰当地聚焦于重症躯体疾病患者的心理特质。此外,在经常被提及的人格特征与躯体形式障碍之间的关联中,因果关系常常被假定。然而,布里凯、夏科、雅内以及早期的弗洛伊德对身心关系这一早期领域的研究复兴,促使人们对这些观察结果的意义进行重新评估。这种重新审视由几个论断所标志。其中两个论断作为论证的前提:1. 生存创伤可能导致持久的人格改变;2. 生存创伤可能导致躯体形式障碍。在过去几年中,这些现象在受攻击的人群以及退伍军人中被重新发现,在他们身上,躯体化的频繁出现还与行为或人格障碍的发生率密切相关。接着出现了两个论点:1. 躯体疾病可能导致持久的人格改变;2. 到目前为止,尚未发现一种明确易患躯体疾病的病前人格。事实上,在20世纪80年代,回顾性和前瞻性研究以及解剖学比较所产生的越来越多的负面结果,积累了关于某些人格因素在躯体疾病发生率中潜在作用的认识。这种辩证关系导致了两个必然论断的联系:1. 躯体疾病患者的“操作性思维”和“述情障碍”可能仅仅代表器质性疾病的宣告或慢性化的一种效应;……