Suppr超能文献

一项评估两种不同剂量的口服磷霉素氨丁三醇在健康成年参与者中的药代动力学、安全性和耐受性的 I 期研究。

Phase I Study To Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Dosing Regimens of Oral Fosfomycin Tromethamine in Healthy Adult Participants.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jul 27;62(8). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00464-18. Print 2018 Aug.

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of two repeated dosing regimens of oral fosfomycin tromethamine were evaluated in 18 healthy adult subjects. Subjects received 3 g every other day (QOD) for 3 doses and then every day (QD) for 7 doses, or vice versa, in a phase I, randomized, open-label, two-period-crossover study. Serial blood ( = 11) and urine ( = 4 collection intervals) samples were collected before and up to 24 h after dosing on days 1 and 5, along with predose concentrations on days 3 and 7. PK parameters were similar between days 1 and 5 within and between dosing regimens. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) PK parameters for fosfomycin in plasma on day 5 during the respective QOD and QD dosing regimens were as follows: maximum concentration of drug in serum () = 24.4 ± 6.2 versus 23.8 ± 5.6 μg/ml, time to () = 2.2 ± 0.7 versus 2.0 ± 0.4 h, apparent volume of distribution (/) = 141 ± 67.9 versus 147 ± 67.6 liters, apparent clearance (CL/) = 21.4 ± 8.0 versus 20.4 ± 5.3 liters/h, renal clearance (CL) = 7.5 ± 4.1 versus 7.3 ± 3.5 liters/h, area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC) = 151.6 ± 35.6 versus 156.6 ± 42.5 μg · h/ml, and elimination half-life () = 4.5 ± 1.1 versus 5.0 ± 1.7 h. Urine concentrations peaked at approximately 600 μg/ml through the 0- to 8-h urine collection intervals but displayed significant interindividual variability. Roughly 35 to 40% of the 3-g dose was excreted in the urine by 24 h postdose. No new safety concerns were identified during this study. The proportion of diarrhea-free days during the study was significantly lower with the QD regimen than with the QOD regimen (61% versus 77%; < 0.0001). Further studies to establish the clinical benefit/risk ratio for repeated dosing regimens of oral fosfomycin tromethamine are warranted. (This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02570074.).

摘要

在 18 名健康成年受试者中评估了两种重复剂量的口服磷霉素氨丁三醇的药代动力学(PK)、安全性和耐受性。受试者接受 3 g 隔日(QOD)给药 3 剂,然后每日(QD)给药 7 剂,或者相反,在一项 I 期、随机、开放标签、两周期交叉研究中。在第 1 天和第 5 天给药前和给药后 24 小时内采集了(= 11)和尿液(= 4 个采集间隔)的连续血样,并在第 3 天和第 7 天采集了预剂量浓度。在各自的 QOD 和 QD 给药方案中,第 5 天的 PK 参数在第 1 天和第 5 天内相似,且方案间也相似。第 5 天 QOD 和 QD 给药方案时磷霉素在血浆中的平均(±标准偏差 [SD])PK 参数如下:血清中药物的最大浓度()= 24.4 ± 6.2 与 23.8 ± 5.6 μg/ml,达峰时间()= 2.2 ± 0.7 与 2.0 ± 0.4 h,表观分布容积(/)= 141 ± 67.9 与 147 ± 67.6 升,表观清除率(CL/)= 21.4 ± 8.0 与 20.4 ± 5.3 升/小时,肾清除率(CL)= 7.5 ± 4.1 与 7.3 ± 3.5 升/小时,0 至 24 小时浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)= 151.6 ± 35.6 与 156.6 ± 42.5 μg·h/ml,消除半衰期()= 4.5 ± 1.1 与 5.0 ± 1.7 h。尿液浓度在 0 至 8 小时的尿液采集间隔内达到约 600 μg/ml,但个体间差异很大。大约 35%至 40%的 3 g 剂量在给药后 24 小时内通过尿液排泄。在这项研究中没有发现新的安全性问题。与 QOD 方案相比,QD 方案的无腹泻天数显著降低(61%比 77%;< 0.0001)。需要进一步的研究来确定口服磷霉素氨丁三醇重复剂量方案的临床获益/风险比。(本试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,注册号为 NCT02570074。)

相似文献

2
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Single-Dose Intravenous (ZTI-01) and Oral Fosfomycin in Healthy Volunteers.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Aug 24;61(9). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00775-17. Print 2017 Sep.
5
Safety and pharmacokinetics of dicloxacillin in healthy Chinese volunteers following single and multiple oral doses.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Oct 16;9:5687-95. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S92117. eCollection 2015.
7
High interindividual variability in urinary fosfomycin concentrations in healthy female volunteers.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 May;24(5):528-532. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
8
Pharmacokinetics of 3 times a day dosing of oral treprostinil in healthy volunteers.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2014 Mar;63(3):227-32. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000039.

引用本文的文献

1
Population pharmacokinetics of oral fosfomycin calcium in healthy women.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Nov 4;79(11):2837-2845. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae295.
2
The Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group: Scientific Advancements and Future Directions.
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 16;77(Suppl 4):S279-S287. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad475.
4
Daily fosfomycin versus levofloxacin for complicated urinary tract infections.
mBio. 2023 Oct 31;14(5):e0167723. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01677-23. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
5
Plasma and Urine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Fosfomycin Tromethamine in Dogs.
Vet Sci. 2023 Jun 8;10(6):391. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10060391.
7
Oral fosfomycin activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae in a dynamic bladder infection in vitro model.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Apr 27;77(5):1324-1333. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac045.
8
Fosfomycin vs Ertapenem for Outpatient Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 23;9(1):ofab620. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab620. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Differences in Fosfomycin Resistance Mechanisms between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and .
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Feb 15;66(2):e0144621. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01446-21. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
10
Oral Fosfomycin Treatment for Enterococcal Urinary Tract Infections in a Dynamic Model.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 May 21;64(6). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00342-20.

本文引用的文献

1
High interindividual variability in urinary fosfomycin concentrations in healthy female volunteers.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 May;24(5):528-532. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
2
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Single-Dose Intravenous (ZTI-01) and Oral Fosfomycin in Healthy Volunteers.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Aug 24;61(9). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00775-17. Print 2017 Sep.
3
Pharmacodynamic activity of fosfomycin simulating urinary concentrations achieved after a single 3-g oral dose versus Escherichia coli using an in vitro model.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Jul;88(3):271-275. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
5
Fosfomycin.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016 Apr;29(2):321-47. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00068-15.
6
Fosfomycin for Treatment of Prostatitis: New Tricks for Old Dogs.
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 1;61(7):1141-3. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ436. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
9
Fosfomycin versus other antibiotics for the treatment of cystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Sep;65(9):1862-77. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq237. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验