• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Phase I Study To Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Dosing Regimens of Oral Fosfomycin Tromethamine in Healthy Adult Participants.一项评估两种不同剂量的口服磷霉素氨丁三醇在健康成年参与者中的药代动力学、安全性和耐受性的 I 期研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jul 27;62(8). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00464-18. Print 2018 Aug.
2
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Single-Dose Intravenous (ZTI-01) and Oral Fosfomycin in Healthy Volunteers.健康志愿者单次静脉(ZTI-01)和口服磷霉素的药代动力学、安全性和耐受性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Aug 24;61(9). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00775-17. Print 2017 Sep.
3
Urinary Bactericidal Activity and Urinary Pharmacodynamics of Fosfomycin after Two Repeated Dosing Regimens of Oral Fosfomycin Tromethamine in Healthy Adult Subjects.健康成年受试者口服磷霉素氨丁三醇重复给药 2 个疗程后的尿杀菌活性和尿药代动力学。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jan 27;64(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02102-19.
4
Pharmacokinetics of dexloxiglumide after administration of single and repeat oral escalating doses in healthy young males.在健康年轻男性中单次及重复口服递增剂量后右氯谷胺的药代动力学。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002 May;40(5):198-206. doi: 10.5414/cpp40198.
5
Safety and pharmacokinetics of dicloxacillin in healthy Chinese volunteers following single and multiple oral doses.双氯西林在健康中国志愿者单次及多次口服给药后的安全性和药代动力学
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Oct 16;9:5687-95. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S92117. eCollection 2015.
6
Relative bioavailability of fosfomycin and of trometamol after administration of single dose by oral route of fosfomycin trometamol in fasting conditions and after a meal.在空腹和餐后条件下口服磷霉素氨丁三醇单剂量后,磷霉素和氨丁三醇的相对生物利用度。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1989 Aug;27(8):411-7.
7
High interindividual variability in urinary fosfomycin concentrations in healthy female volunteers.健康女性志愿者尿液磷霉素浓度的个体间变异性很大。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 May;24(5):528-532. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
8
Pharmacokinetics of 3 times a day dosing of oral treprostinil in healthy volunteers.健康志愿者每日口服曲前列尼尔三次的药代动力学
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2014 Mar;63(3):227-32. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000039.
9
Double-blind evaluation of the safety and pharmacokinetics of multiple oral once-daily 750-milligram and 1-gram doses of levofloxacin in healthy volunteers.健康志愿者中多次口服每日一次750毫克和1克剂量左氧氟沙星的安全性和药代动力学的双盲评估。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Apr;42(4):885-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.4.885.
10
Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan in healthy subjects following ascending single intranasal doses and multiple intranasal doses.舒马曲坦单次递增鼻内给药和多次鼻内给药后在健康受试者中的安全性、耐受性及药代动力学
Cephalalgia. 1997 Jun;17(4):541-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1997.1704541.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Population pharmacokinetics of oral fosfomycin calcium in healthy women.健康女性口服磷霉素钙的群体药代动力学研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Nov 4;79(11):2837-2845. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae295.
2
The Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group: Scientific Advancements and Future Directions.抗菌耐药性领导组织:科学进展与未来方向。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 16;77(Suppl 4):S279-S287. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad475.
3
Priorities and Progress in Gram-negative Bacterial Infection Research by the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group.抗菌药物耐药性领军者革兰氏阴性菌感染研究的重点和进展
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 16;77(Suppl 4):S305-S313. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad547.
4
Daily fosfomycin versus levofloxacin for complicated urinary tract infections.每日磷霉素与左氧氟沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染。
mBio. 2023 Oct 31;14(5):e0167723. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01677-23. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
5
Plasma and Urine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Fosfomycin Tromethamine in Dogs.犬口服磷霉素氨丁三醇的血浆和尿液药代动力学
Vet Sci. 2023 Jun 8;10(6):391. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10060391.
6
Fosfomycin Pharmacokinetic Profile in Plasma and Urine and Quantitative Estimation in Prostate and Seminal Vesicles after One and Two Consecutive Doses of Oral Fosfomycin Trometamol in Healthy Male Volunteers.健康男性志愿者连续单次及两次口服磷霉素氨丁三醇后血浆和尿液中的磷霉素药代动力学特征以及前列腺和精囊中磷霉素的定量测定
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Oct 22;11(11):1458. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111458.
7
Oral fosfomycin activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae in a dynamic bladder infection in vitro model.口服磷霉素对体外动态膀胱感染肺炎克雷伯菌的活性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Apr 27;77(5):1324-1333. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac045.
8
Fosfomycin vs Ertapenem for Outpatient Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.磷霉素与厄他培南用于门诊治疗复杂性尿路感染:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 23;9(1):ofab620. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab620. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Differences in Fosfomycin Resistance Mechanisms between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and .铜绿假单胞菌与. 之间磷霉素耐药机制的差异。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Feb 15;66(2):e0144621. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01446-21. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
10
Oral Fosfomycin Treatment for Enterococcal Urinary Tract Infections in a Dynamic Model.动态模型中口服磷霉素治疗肠球菌尿路感染。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 May 21;64(6). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00342-20.

本文引用的文献

1
High interindividual variability in urinary fosfomycin concentrations in healthy female volunteers.健康女性志愿者尿液磷霉素浓度的个体间变异性很大。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 May;24(5):528-532. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
2
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Single-Dose Intravenous (ZTI-01) and Oral Fosfomycin in Healthy Volunteers.健康志愿者单次静脉(ZTI-01)和口服磷霉素的药代动力学、安全性和耐受性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Aug 24;61(9). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00775-17. Print 2017 Sep.
3
Pharmacodynamic activity of fosfomycin simulating urinary concentrations achieved after a single 3-g oral dose versus Escherichia coli using an in vitro model.采用体外模型,比较单次口服3克磷霉素后模拟尿液浓度时对大肠杆菌的药效学活性。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Jul;88(3):271-275. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
4
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of ZTI-01 (Fosfomycin for Injection) in the Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.ZTI-01(注射用磷霉素)在中性粒细胞减少小鼠大腿感染模型中对大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌的药代动力学和药效学
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 May 24;61(6). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00476-17. Print 2017 Jun.
5
Fosfomycin.磷霉素
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016 Apr;29(2):321-47. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00068-15.
6
Fosfomycin for Treatment of Prostatitis: New Tricks for Old Dogs.磷霉素治疗前列腺炎:老药新用。
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 1;61(7):1141-3. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ436. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
7
Evaluation of three-dose fosfomycin tromethamine in the treatment of patients with urinary tract infections: an uncontrolled, open-label, multicentre study.评价三剂量磷霉素氨丁三醇治疗尿路感染患者的效果:一项非对照、开放标签、多中心研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 4;3(12):e004157. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004157.
8
International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: A 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.国际临床实践指南:女性急性单纯性膀胱炎和肾盂肾炎的治疗(2010 年更新):美国传染病学会和欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Mar 1;52(5):e103-20. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq257.
9
Fosfomycin versus other antibiotics for the treatment of cystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.磷霉素与其他抗生素治疗膀胱炎的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Sep;65(9):1862-77. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq237. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
10
Fosfomycin in the treatment of extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli-related lower urinary tract infections.磷霉素治疗产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠埃希菌相关的下尿路感染
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007 Jan;29(1):62-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.08.039.

一项评估两种不同剂量的口服磷霉素氨丁三醇在健康成年参与者中的药代动力学、安全性和耐受性的 I 期研究。

Phase I Study To Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Dosing Regimens of Oral Fosfomycin Tromethamine in Healthy Adult Participants.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jul 27;62(8). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00464-18. Print 2018 Aug.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.00464-18
PMID:29891606
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6105781/
Abstract

The pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of two repeated dosing regimens of oral fosfomycin tromethamine were evaluated in 18 healthy adult subjects. Subjects received 3 g every other day (QOD) for 3 doses and then every day (QD) for 7 doses, or vice versa, in a phase I, randomized, open-label, two-period-crossover study. Serial blood ( = 11) and urine ( = 4 collection intervals) samples were collected before and up to 24 h after dosing on days 1 and 5, along with predose concentrations on days 3 and 7. PK parameters were similar between days 1 and 5 within and between dosing regimens. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) PK parameters for fosfomycin in plasma on day 5 during the respective QOD and QD dosing regimens were as follows: maximum concentration of drug in serum () = 24.4 ± 6.2 versus 23.8 ± 5.6 μg/ml, time to () = 2.2 ± 0.7 versus 2.0 ± 0.4 h, apparent volume of distribution (/) = 141 ± 67.9 versus 147 ± 67.6 liters, apparent clearance (CL/) = 21.4 ± 8.0 versus 20.4 ± 5.3 liters/h, renal clearance (CL) = 7.5 ± 4.1 versus 7.3 ± 3.5 liters/h, area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC) = 151.6 ± 35.6 versus 156.6 ± 42.5 μg · h/ml, and elimination half-life () = 4.5 ± 1.1 versus 5.0 ± 1.7 h. Urine concentrations peaked at approximately 600 μg/ml through the 0- to 8-h urine collection intervals but displayed significant interindividual variability. Roughly 35 to 40% of the 3-g dose was excreted in the urine by 24 h postdose. No new safety concerns were identified during this study. The proportion of diarrhea-free days during the study was significantly lower with the QD regimen than with the QOD regimen (61% versus 77%; < 0.0001). Further studies to establish the clinical benefit/risk ratio for repeated dosing regimens of oral fosfomycin tromethamine are warranted. (This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02570074.).

摘要

在 18 名健康成年受试者中评估了两种重复剂量的口服磷霉素氨丁三醇的药代动力学(PK)、安全性和耐受性。受试者接受 3 g 隔日(QOD)给药 3 剂,然后每日(QD)给药 7 剂,或者相反,在一项 I 期、随机、开放标签、两周期交叉研究中。在第 1 天和第 5 天给药前和给药后 24 小时内采集了(= 11)和尿液(= 4 个采集间隔)的连续血样,并在第 3 天和第 7 天采集了预剂量浓度。在各自的 QOD 和 QD 给药方案中,第 5 天的 PK 参数在第 1 天和第 5 天内相似,且方案间也相似。第 5 天 QOD 和 QD 给药方案时磷霉素在血浆中的平均(±标准偏差 [SD])PK 参数如下:血清中药物的最大浓度()= 24.4 ± 6.2 与 23.8 ± 5.6 μg/ml,达峰时间()= 2.2 ± 0.7 与 2.0 ± 0.4 h,表观分布容积(/)= 141 ± 67.9 与 147 ± 67.6 升,表观清除率(CL/)= 21.4 ± 8.0 与 20.4 ± 5.3 升/小时,肾清除率(CL)= 7.5 ± 4.1 与 7.3 ± 3.5 升/小时,0 至 24 小时浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)= 151.6 ± 35.6 与 156.6 ± 42.5 μg·h/ml,消除半衰期()= 4.5 ± 1.1 与 5.0 ± 1.7 h。尿液浓度在 0 至 8 小时的尿液采集间隔内达到约 600 μg/ml,但个体间差异很大。大约 35%至 40%的 3 g 剂量在给药后 24 小时内通过尿液排泄。在这项研究中没有发现新的安全性问题。与 QOD 方案相比,QD 方案的无腹泻天数显著降低(61%比 77%;< 0.0001)。需要进一步的研究来确定口服磷霉素氨丁三醇重复剂量方案的临床获益/风险比。(本试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,注册号为 NCT02570074。)