University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash Universitygrid.1002.3, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Feb 15;66(2):e0144621. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01446-21. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa presents a serious threat to public health due to its widespread resistance to numerous antibiotics. P. aeruginosa commonly causes nosocomial infections including urinary tract infections (UTI) which have become increasingly difficult to treat. The lack of effective therapeutic agents has renewed interest in fosfomycin, an old drug discovered in the 1960s and approved prior to the rigorous standards now required for drug approval. Fosfomycin has a unique structure and mechanism of action, making it a favorable therapeutic alternative for MDR pathogens that are resistant to other classes of antibiotics. The absence of susceptibility breakpoints for fosfomycin against P. aeruginosa limits its clinical use and interpretation due to extrapolation of breakpoints established for Escherichia coli or without supporting evidence. Furthermore, fosfomycin use and efficacy for treatment of P. aeruginosa are also limited by both inherent and acquired resistance mechanisms. This narrative review provides an update on currently identified mechanisms of resistance to fosfomycin, with a focus on those mediated by P. aeruginosa such as peptidoglycan recycling enzymes, chromosomal Fos enzymes, and transporter mutation. Additional fosfomycin resistance mechanisms exhibited by , including mutations in transporters and associated regulators, plasmid-mediated Fos enzymes, kinases, and modification, are also summarized and contrasted. These data highlight that different fosfomycin resistance mechanisms may be associated with elevated MIC values in P. aeruginosa compared to , emphasizing that extrapolation of E. coli breakpoints to P. aeruginosa should be avoided.
耐多药(MDR)铜绿假单胞菌由于对多种抗生素广泛耐药,对公共卫生构成严重威胁。铜绿假单胞菌常引起医院获得性感染,包括尿路感染(UTI),这些感染越来越难以治疗。由于缺乏有效的治疗药物,人们对 1960 年代发现的旧药物磷霉素重新产生了兴趣,该药物在现在药物批准所需的严格标准之前获得批准。磷霉素具有独特的结构和作用机制,使其成为对其他类抗生素耐药的 MDR 病原体的理想治疗选择。由于对铜绿假单胞菌缺乏针对磷霉素的药敏折点,限制了其临床应用和解释,因为只能从大肠杆菌推断出折点,或没有支持证据。此外,磷霉素的使用和治疗铜绿假单胞菌的疗效也受到固有和获得性耐药机制的限制。本综述介绍了目前鉴定的磷霉素耐药机制,重点介绍了铜绿假单胞菌介导的耐药机制,如肽聚糖回收酶、染色体 Fos 酶和转运体突变。还总结并对比了 表现出的其他磷霉素耐药机制,包括转运体和相关调节剂、质粒介导的 Fos 酶、激酶和修饰的突变。这些数据强调,与 相比,不同的磷霉素耐药机制可能与铜绿假单胞菌中 MIC 值升高有关,强调应避免将大肠杆菌折点推断到铜绿假单胞菌。