Visser Lennart, Korthagen Fred A J, Schoonenboom Judith
Master's Program for Teachers, Driestar Christian University for Teacher Education, Gouda, Netherlands.
Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2018 May 28;9:808. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00808. eCollection 2018.
Within the field of procrastination, much research has been conducted on factors that have an influence on academic procrastination. Less is known about how such factors may differ for various students. In addition, not much is known about differences in the process of how factors influence students' learning and what creates differences in procrastination behavior between students with different levels of academic procrastination. In this study learning characteristics and the self-regulation behavior of three groups of students with different levels of academic procrastination were compared. The rationale behind this was that certain learning characteristics and self-regulation behaviors may play out differently in students with different levels of academic procrastination. Participants were first-year students ( = 22) with different levels of academic procrastination enrolled in an elementary teacher education program. The selection of the participants into three groups of students (low procrastination, = 8; average procrastination, = 8; high procrastination, = 6) was based on their scores on a questionnaire measuring the students' levels of academic procrastination. From semi-structured interviews, six themes emerged that describe how students in the three groups deal with factors that influence the students' learning: degree program choice, getting started with study activities, engagement in study activities, ways of reacting to failure, view of oneself, and study results. This study shows the importance of looking at differences in how students deal with certain factors possibly negatively influencing their learning. Within the group of students with average and high levels of academic procrastination, factors influencing their learning are regularly present. These factors lead to procrastination behavior among students with high levels of academic procrastination, but this seems not the case among students with an average level of academic procrastination.
在拖延领域,已经对影响学业拖延的因素进行了大量研究。对于这些因素在不同学生中可能存在的差异,我们了解得较少。此外,对于这些因素影响学生学习的过程中的差异,以及不同学业拖延水平的学生在拖延行为上产生差异的原因,我们也知之甚少。在本研究中,我们比较了三组不同学业拖延水平的学生的学习特征和自我调节行为。这样做的基本原理是,某些学习特征和自我调节行为在不同学业拖延水平的学生中可能会有不同的表现。参与者是参加小学教师教育项目的具有不同学业拖延水平的一年级学生(n = 22)。根据他们在一份测量学生学业拖延水平的问卷上的得分,将参与者分为三组学生(低拖延组,n = 8;中等拖延组,n = 8;高拖延组,n = 6)。从半结构化访谈中,出现了六个主题,描述了三组学生如何应对影响他们学习的因素:学位课程选择、开始学习活动、参与学习活动、对失败的反应方式、自我看法以及学习结果。本研究表明,关注学生应对可能对其学习产生负面影响的某些因素的方式差异非常重要。在中等和高学业拖延水平的学生群体中,影响他们学习的因素经常存在。这些因素导致高学业拖延水平的学生出现拖延行为,但在中等学业拖延水平的学生中似乎并非如此。