• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of captivity on morphology: negligible changes in external morphology mask significant changes in internal morphology.圈养对形态的影响:外部形态的细微变化掩盖了内部形态的显著变化。
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 May 9;5(5):172470. doi: 10.1098/rsos.172470. eCollection 2018 May.
2
Assortative mating among animals of captive and wild origin following experimental conservation releases.实验性保护放归后圈养及野生来源动物之间的选型交配。
Biol Lett. 2014 Nov;10(11):20140656. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0656.
3
The phenotypic costs of captivity.圈养的表型代价。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Apr;98(2):434-449. doi: 10.1111/brv.12913. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
4
What role does heritability play in transgenerational phenotypic responses to captivity? Implications for managing captive populations.遗传力在对圈养的跨代表型反应中起什么作用?对圈养种群管理的启示。
Zoo Biol. 2017 Dec;36(6):397-406. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21389. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
5
Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.勘误:切除眼柄以增加泥蟹的卵巢成熟度。
J Vis Exp. 2023 May 26(195). doi: 10.3791/6561.
6
Population correlates of rapid captive-induced maladaptation in a wild fish.野生鱼类在圈养环境中快速诱发的适应不良的种群相关因素。
Evol Appl. 2018 Jun 19;12(7):1305-1317. doi: 10.1111/eva.12649. eCollection 2019 Aug.
7
Captivity, Reintroductions, and the Rewilding of Amphibian-associated Bacterial Communities.圈养、再引入和两栖动物相关细菌群落的再野生化。
Microb Ecol. 2023 Nov;86(4):2271-2281. doi: 10.1007/s00248-023-02229-3. Epub 2023 May 24.
8
Captive breeding does not alter brain volume in a marsupial over a few generations.圈养繁殖在几代的时间里不会改变有袋动物的脑容量。
Zoo Biol. 2012 Jan-Feb;31(1):82-6. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20393. Epub 2011 May 9.
9
Cranial morphology of captive mammals: a meta-analysis.圈养哺乳动物的颅骨形态学:一项荟萃分析。
Front Zool. 2021 Jan 23;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12983-021-00386-0.
10
Gut Microbiomes of Endangered Przewalski's Horse Populations in Short- and Long-Term Captivity: Implication for Species Reintroduction Based on the Soft-Release Strategy.短期和长期圈养的濒危普氏野马种群的肠道微生物群:基于软释放策略对物种重新引入的启示
Front Microbiol. 2020 Mar 12;11:363. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00363. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Body and Testicular Biometry and Epididymal Sperm Characteristics in Sambar Deer (Rusa unicolor (Kerr, 1792)).水鹿(Rusa unicolor (Kerr, 1792))的身体和睾丸生物测量以及附睾精子特征
Reprod Domest Anim. 2025 Sep;60(9):e70122. doi: 10.1111/rda.70122.
2
Long-term impacts of captivity on skull morphology and endocranial volume in a marsupial carnivore.圈养对有袋食肉动物颅骨形态和颅内容积的长期影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 21;12(5):240868. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240868. eCollection 2025 May.
3
First Steps towards the Development of Epigenetic Biomarkers in Female Cheetahs ().雌性猎豹表观遗传生物标志物开发的初步步骤()
Life (Basel). 2022 Jun 20;12(6):920. doi: 10.3390/life12060920.
4
Endocranial volume increases across captive generations in the endangered Mexican wolf.墨西哥濒危灰狼在圈养世代中的脑容量增加。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 17;12(1):8147. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12371-6.
5
Effects of reduced mobility on trabecular bone density in captive big cats.圈养大猫活动减少对小梁骨密度的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Mar 30;9(3):211345. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211345. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
Understanding fish cognition: a review and appraisal of current practices.理解鱼类认知:当前实践的回顾与评价。
Anim Cogn. 2021 May;24(3):395-406. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01488-2. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
7
Cranial morphology of captive mammals: a meta-analysis.圈养哺乳动物的颅骨形态学:一项荟萃分析。
Front Zool. 2021 Jan 23;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12983-021-00386-0.
8
The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate ().圈养的印记:一种野生有蹄类动物踝骨的可塑性反应()
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Mar 4;7(3):192039. doi: 10.1098/rsos.192039. eCollection 2020 Mar.
9
Natural diets promote retention of the native gut microbiota in captive rodents.天然饮食可促进圈养啮齿动物保留其本土肠道微生物群。
ISME J. 2020 Jan;14(1):67-78. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0497-6. Epub 2019 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

1
EVOLUTION OF BASAL METABOLIC RATE AND ORGAN MASSES IN LABORATORY MICE.实验小鼠基础代谢率与器官质量的演变
Evolution. 1995 Dec;49(6):1239-1248. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb04450.x.
2
Effects of ocean acidification on embryonic respiration and development of a temperate wrasse living along a natural CO2 gradient.海洋酸化对生活在自然二氧化碳梯度区域的一种温带隆头鱼胚胎呼吸和发育的影响。
Conserv Physiol. 2016 Feb 26;4(1):cov073. doi: 10.1093/conphys/cov073. eCollection 2016.
3
Long-term changes in food availability mediate the effects of temperature on growth, development and survival in striped marsh frog larvae: implications for captive breeding programmes.食物可利用性的长期变化介导了温度对条纹沼蛙幼体生长、发育和存活的影响:对圈养繁殖计划的启示。
Conserv Physiol. 2015 Jul 8;3(1):cov029. doi: 10.1093/conphys/cov029. eCollection 2015.
4
Physiology in conservation translocations.保护转移中的生理学
Conserv Physiol. 2014 Dec 17;2(1):cou054. doi: 10.1093/conphys/cou054. eCollection 2014.
5
Embryo oxygenation in pipefish brood pouches: novel insights.海龙育幼袋中的胚胎氧合作用:新见解
J Exp Biol. 2015 Jun;218(Pt 11):1639-46. doi: 10.1242/jeb.120907.
6
Integrating evolution in the management of captive zoo populations.将进化理念融入圈养动物园种群管理之中。
Evol Appl. 2015 Jun;8(5):413-22. doi: 10.1111/eva.12258. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
7
Diet complexity in early life affects survival in released pheasants by altering foraging efficiency, food choice, handling skills and gut morphology.早期生活中的饮食复杂性通过改变觅食效率、食物选择、处理技能和肠道形态来影响释放野鸡的存活率。
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Nov;84(6):1480-9. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12401. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
8
Can sexual selection theory inform genetic management of captive populations? A review.性选择理论能否为圈养种群的遗传管理提供信息?综述。
Evol Appl. 2014 Nov;7(9):1120-33. doi: 10.1111/eva.12229. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
9
Assortative mating among animals of captive and wild origin following experimental conservation releases.实验性保护放归后圈养及野生来源动物之间的选型交配。
Biol Lett. 2014 Nov;10(11):20140656. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0656.
10
The three-dimensional morphological effects of captivity.圈养的三维形态学效应。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 19;9(11):e113437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113437. eCollection 2014.

圈养对形态的影响:外部形态的细微变化掩盖了内部形态的显著变化。

Effect of captivity on morphology: negligible changes in external morphology mask significant changes in internal morphology.

作者信息

Courtney Jones Stephanie K, Munn Adam J, Byrne Phillip G

机构信息

Centre for Sustainable Ecosystem Solutions, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.

School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney New South Wales 2052, Australia.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2018 May 9;5(5):172470. doi: 10.1098/rsos.172470. eCollection 2018 May.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.172470
PMID:29892434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5990819/
Abstract

Captive breeding programmes are increasingly relied upon for threatened species management. Changes in morphology can occur in captivity, often with unknown consequences for reintroductions. Few studies have examined the morphological changes that occur in captive animals compared with wild animals. Further, the effect of multiple generations being maintained in captivity, and the potential effects of captivity on sexual dimorphism remain poorly understood. We compared external and internal morphology of captive and wild animals using house mouse () as a model species. In addition, we looked at morphology across two captive generations, and compared morphology between sexes. We found no statistically significant differences in external morphology, but after one generation in captivity there was evidence for a shift in the internal morphology of captive-reared mice; captive-reared mice (two generations bred) had lighter combined kidney and spleen masses compared with wild-caught mice. Sexual dimorphism was maintained in captivity. Our findings demonstrate that captive breeding can alter internal morphology. Given that these morphological changes may impact organismal functioning and viability following release, further investigation is warranted. If the morphological change is shown to be maladaptive, these changes would have significant implications for captive-source populations that are used for reintroduction, including reduced survivorship.

摘要

圈养繁殖计划在濒危物种管理中越来越受到依赖。圈养环境中可能会出现形态变化,而这些变化对重新引入的后果往往未知。与野生动物相比,很少有研究考察圈养动物所发生的形态变化。此外,对于多代圈养所产生的影响以及圈养对两性异形的潜在影响,人们仍知之甚少。我们以家鼠()作为模式物种,比较了圈养动物和野生动物的外部及内部形态。此外,我们研究了两代圈养动物的形态,并比较了两性之间的形态。我们发现外部形态没有统计学上的显著差异,但在圈养一代后,有证据表明圈养繁殖的小鼠内部形态发生了变化;与野生捕获的小鼠相比,圈养繁殖的小鼠(繁殖了两代)肾脏和脾脏的总质量更轻。两性异形在圈养环境中得以维持。我们的研究结果表明,圈养繁殖会改变内部形态。鉴于这些形态变化可能会影响放归后的生物体功能和生存能力,因此有必要进行进一步调查。如果形态变化被证明是适应不良的,那么这些变化将对用于重新引入的圈养来源种群产生重大影响,包括存活率降低。