• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同启发式和分解技术在河流水位建模中的比较。

Comparison of different heuristic and decomposition techniques for river stage modeling.

机构信息

Department of Constructional and Environmental Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Sangju, 37224, South Korea.

Department of Railroad Construction and Safety Engineering, Dongyang University, Yeongju, 36040, South Korea.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jun 12;190(7):392. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6768-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-018-6768-2
PMID:29892912
Abstract

This paper proposes hybrid soft computing models for daily river stage modeling. The models combine variational mode decomposition (VMD) with different soft computing models, including artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and random forest (RF). The performances of VMD-based models (VMD-ANN, VMD-ANFIS, and VMD-RF) are assessed by model efficiency indices and graphical comparison, and compared with those of single models (ANN, ANFIS, and RF) and ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD)-based models (EEMD-ANN, EEMD-ANFIS, and EEMD-RF). Results show that VMD-ANN, VMD-ANFIS, and VMD-RF models are more efficient and accurate than ANN, ANFIS, and RF models, respectively, and slightly better than EEMD-ANN, EEMD-ANFIS, and EEMD-RF models, respectively. In terms of model efficiency and accuracy, the top five models are VMD-ANFIS, EEMD-ANFIS, VMD-ANN, VMD-RF, and ANFIS and the VMD-ANFIS model is the best. It is found that VMD can enhance the performance of conventional single soft computing models; VMD is more effective than EEMD for hybrid model development; and the ANFIS model combined with VMD and EEMD can yield better efficiency and accuracy than other models. Therefore, VMD-based hybrid modeling is a more effective method for reliable daily river stage modeling.

摘要

本文提出了基于混合软计算模型的日尺度河流水位建模方法。该模型将变分模态分解(VMD)与不同的软计算模型(包括人工神经网络(ANN)、自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)和随机森林(RF))相结合。通过模型效率指标和图形比较评估了基于 VMD 的模型(VMD-ANN、VMD-ANFIS 和 VMD-RF)的性能,并与单一模型(ANN、ANFIS 和 RF)和基于集合经验模态分解(EEMD)的模型(EEMD-ANN、EEMD-ANFIS 和 EEMD-RF)进行了比较。结果表明,VMD-ANN、VMD-ANFIS 和 VMD-RF 模型分别比 ANN、ANFIS 和 RF 模型更有效和准确,且略优于 EEMD-ANN、EEMD-ANFIS 和 EEMD-RF 模型。就模型效率和准确性而言,排名前五的模型分别为 VMD-ANFIS、EEMD-ANFIS、VMD-ANN、VMD-RF 和 ANFIS,其中 VMD-ANFIS 模型表现最佳。研究结果表明,VMD 可以增强传统单一软计算模型的性能;与 EEMD 相比,VMD 更适合于混合模型的开发;而将 VMD 和 EEMD 与 ANFIS 模型相结合,可获得比其他模型更好的效率和准确性。因此,基于 VMD 的混合建模是一种更有效的可靠日尺度河流水位建模方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of different heuristic and decomposition techniques for river stage modeling.不同启发式和分解技术在河流水位建模中的比较。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jun 12;190(7):392. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6768-2.
2
A comparison of various artificial intelligence approaches performance for estimating suspended sediment load of river systems: a case study in United States.评估河流系统悬浮泥沙负荷的各种人工智能方法性能比较:以美国为例
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Apr;187(4):189. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4381-1. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
3
Improving one-dimensional pollution dispersion modeling in rivers using ANFIS and ANN-based GA optimized models.利用基于 ANFIS 和基于 ANN 的 GA 优化模型改进河流一维污染扩散模型。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(1):867-885. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3613-7. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
4
Modeling daily water temperature for rivers: comparison between adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems and artificial neural networks models.河流日水温建模:自适应神经模糊推理系统与人工神经网络模型的比较。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(1):402-420. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3650-2. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
5
Comparative study of artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and multiple linear regression (MLR) for modeling of Cu (II) adsorption from aqueous solution using biochar derived from rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum) peel.采用从红毛丹(Nephelium lappaceum)果皮中提取的生物炭,对人工神经网络(ANN)、自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)和多元线性回归(MLR)进行比较研究,以建立从水溶液中吸附 Cu(II)的模型。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jun 17;192(7):439. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08268-4.
6
Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for epileptic seizure detection using wavelet feature extraction.基于小波特征提取的自适应神经模糊推理系统在癫痫发作检测中的应用。
Comput Biol Med. 2007 Feb;37(2):227-44. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Feb 9.
7
Two hybrid data-driven models for modeling water-air temperature relationship in rivers.两种混合数据驱动模型用于模拟河流中的水-气温度关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Apr;26(12):12622-12630. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04716-y. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
8
Improving the prediction accuracy of river inflow using two data pre-processing techniques coupled with data-driven model.结合两种数据预处理技术和数据驱动模型提高河流流量预测精度。
PeerJ. 2019 Dec 6;7:e8043. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8043. eCollection 2019.
9
Prediction of Attendance Demand in European Football Games: Comparison of ANFIS, Fuzzy Logic, and ANN.欧洲足球比赛观众需求预测:自适应神经模糊推理系统、模糊逻辑和人工神经网络的比较。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2018 Aug 7;2018:5714872. doi: 10.1155/2018/5714872. eCollection 2018.
10
Application of artificial neural networks to predict the heavy metal contamination in the Bartin River.应用人工神经网络预测巴特恩河重金属污染
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(34):42495-42512. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10156-w. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel stabilized artificial neural network model enhanced by variational mode decomposing.一种通过变分模态分解增强的新型稳定人工神经网络模型。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 4;10(13):e34142. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34142. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
2
Prediction of COD in industrial wastewater treatment plant using an artificial neural network.基于人工神经网络的工业污水处理厂 COD 预测。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 14;14(1):13750. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64634-z.