• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创食管切除术的手术团队熟练度与病例量有关,并可改善患者预后。

Surgical team proficiency in minimally invasive esophagectomy is related to case volume and improves patient outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterology Center, The Cancer Institute, Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.

出版信息

Esophagus. 2018 Apr;15(2):115-121. doi: 10.1007/s10388-018-0607-y. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1007/s10388-018-0607-y
PMID:29892937
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is being increasingly performed; however, it is still associated with high morbidity and mortality. The correlation between surgical team proficiency and patient load lacks clarity. This study evaluates surgical outcomes during the first 3-year period after establishment of a new surgical team.

METHODS

A new surgical team was established in September 2013 by two expert surgeons having experience of performing more than 100 MIEs. We assessed 237 consecutive patients who underwent MIE for esophageal cancer and evaluated the impact of surgical team proficiency on postoperative outcomes, as well as the team learning curve.

RESULTS

In the cumulative sum analysis, a point of downward inflection for operative time and blood loss was observed in case 175. After 175 cases, both operative time and blood loss significantly decreased (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively), and postoperative incidence of pneumonia significantly decreased from 18.9 to 6.5% (P = 0.024). Median postoperative hospital stay also decreased from 20 to 18 days (P = 0.022). Additionally, serum CRP levels on postoperative day 1 showed a significant, but weak inverse association with the number of cases (P = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

After 175 cases, both operative time and blood loss significantly decreased. In addition, the incidence of pneumonia decreased significantly. Additionally, surgical team proficiency may decrease serum CRP levels immediately after MIE. Surgical team proficiency based on team experience had beneficial effects on patients undergoing MIE.

摘要

背景

微创食管切除术(MIE)的应用日益增多,但仍与较高的发病率和死亡率相关。手术团队熟练度与患者量之间的相关性尚不清楚。本研究评估了新手术团队成立后最初 3 年的手术结果。

方法

2013 年 9 月,由两位具有 100 多例 MIE 经验的专家外科医生组成的新手术团队成立。我们评估了 237 例连续接受 MIE 治疗食管癌的患者,并评估了手术团队熟练度对术后结果的影响,以及团队学习曲线。

结果

在累积和分析中,在第 175 例时观察到手术时间和出血量的拐点。在第 175 例之后,手术时间和出血量均显著减少(P<0.001 和 P<0.001),术后肺炎发生率从 18.9%显著降低至 6.5%(P=0.024)。术后住院时间中位数也从 20 天缩短至 18 天(P=0.022)。此外,术后第 1 天血清 CRP 水平与病例数呈显著但较弱的负相关(P=0.024)。

结论

在第 175 例之后,手术时间和出血量均显著减少。此外,肺炎发生率显著降低。此外,MIE 术后手术团队熟练度可能会降低血清 CRP 水平。基于团队经验的手术团队熟练度对接受 MIE 的患者有有益的影响。

相似文献

1
Surgical team proficiency in minimally invasive esophagectomy is related to case volume and improves patient outcomes.微创食管切除术的手术团队熟练度与病例量有关,并可改善患者预后。
Esophagus. 2018 Apr;15(2):115-121. doi: 10.1007/s10388-018-0607-y. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
2
Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position improves postoperative outcomes: role of C-reactive protein as an indicator of surgical invasiveness.俯卧位微创食管切除术改善术后结局:C 反应蛋白作为手术侵袭性指标的作用。
Esophagus. 2018 Apr;15(2):95-102. doi: 10.1007/s10388-017-0602-8. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
3
Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌不同食管切除术方法的成本与效益
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2017 Sep-Oct;25(7-8):513-517. doi: 10.1177/0218492317731389. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
4
Experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术的经验
Surg Endosc. 2006 Feb;20(2):298-301. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0093-x. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
5
Attaining Proficiency in Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy While Maximizing Safety During Procedure Development.在手术技术发展过程中,在实现机器人辅助微创食管切除术熟练程度的同时,最大限度地提高手术安全性。
Innovations (Phila). 2016 Jul-Aug;11(4):268-73. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000297.
6
Conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive esophagectomy portends worse short-term outcomes: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.微创食管切除术中转开胸手术预示着更差的短期结局:国家癌症数据库分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3470-3478. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07124-y. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
7
Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.开放手术与微创食管切除术:局部晚期食管腺癌的临床结局
Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2614-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3978-8. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
8
C-Reactive Protein Indicates Early Stage of Postoperative Infectious Complications in Patients Following Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.C反应蛋白提示微创食管癌切除术后患者术后感染性并发症的早期阶段。
World J Surg. 2017 Mar;41(3):796-803. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3803-8.
9
Two-Stage Indicators to Assess Learning Curves for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.用于评估微创Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术学习曲线的两阶段指标
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Aug;66(5):362-369. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593408. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
10
Change from Hybrid to Fully Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy is Possible without Compromises.从杂交手术转变为完全微创和机器人辅助食管切除术是可行的,且不会有任何妥协。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Oct;67(7):589-596. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1670664. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Caseload per Year in Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Narrative Review.机器人辅助微创食管切除术的年度病例量:一项叙述性综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 19;16(20):3538. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203538.
2
Implementing a robotic hepatopancreatobiliary program for new faculty: safety, feasibility and lessons learned.为新教员实施机器人肝胆胰计划:安全性、可行性和经验教训。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 15;18(1):253. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02011-8.
3
Operating room organization and surgical performance: a systematic review.手术室组织与手术绩效:一项系统综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Learning Curve and Associated Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.微创食管切除术的学习曲线和相关发病率:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):88-94. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002469.
2
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.利用日本全国性数据库对开放式与微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的短期结局进行比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):1821-1827. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5808-4. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
3
Impact of hospital volume on risk-adjusted mortality following oesophagectomy in Japan.
Patient Saf Surg. 2024 Jan 29;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13037-023-00388-3.
4
A narrative review of anastomotic leak in the Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: expected, accepted, but preventable.关于艾弗·刘易斯食管切除术吻合口漏的叙述性综述:可预期、可接受,但可预防。
Transl Cancer Res. 2023 Sep 30;12(9):2405-2419. doi: 10.21037/tcr-23-515. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
5
Skill-qualified surgeons positively affect short-term outcomes after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a survey of the National Clinical Database of Japan.技能熟练的外科医生对腹腔镜胃癌根治术的短期疗效有积极影响:来自日本国家临床数据库的调查。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4627-4640. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09950-7. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
6
Learning Curve for Lymph Node Dissection Around the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve in McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.麦基翁微创食管切除术中喉返神经周围淋巴结清扫的学习曲线
Front Oncol. 2021 May 20;11:654674. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.654674. eCollection 2021.
7
Learning curve and postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术的学习曲线及术后结果
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(Suppl 5):S777-S785. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.54.
8
The usefulness of three-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients.三维电视辅助胸腔镜手术在食管癌患者中的应用价值。
Esophagus. 2019 Jul;16(3):272-277. doi: 10.1007/s10388-019-00661-4. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
日本食管切除术术后风险调整死亡率与医院容量的关系。
Br J Surg. 2016 Dec;103(13):1880-1886. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10307. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
4
Impact of Weekday of Esophagectomy on Short-term and Long-term Oncological Outcomes: A Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study in the Netherlands.食管癌切除术日期对短期和长期肿瘤学结局的影响:荷兰一项基于全国人群的队列研究
Ann Surg. 2017 Jul;266(1):76-81. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001909.
5
Trainee competence in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position: evaluation using cumulative sum techniques.俯卧位胸腔镜食管切除术学员能力评估:运用累积和技术进行评价
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Sep;401(6):797-804. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1484-2. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
6
Surgical Proficiency Gain and Survival After Esophagectomy for Cancer.癌症患者食管癌切除术后手术熟练度提升与生存
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 1;34(13):1528-36. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.2875. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
7
National proficiency-gain curves for minimally invasive gastrointestinal cancer surgery.微创胃肠癌手术的全国能力提升曲线。
Br J Surg. 2016 Jan;103(1):88-96. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9963. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
8
Surgeon Volume and Cancer Esophagectomy, Gastrectomy, and Pancreatectomy: A Population-based Study in England.外科医生手术量与食管癌切除术、胃癌切除术和胰十二指肠切除术:一项基于英格兰人群的研究。
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):727-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001490.
9
Factors affecting cytokine change after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌食管切除术后影响细胞因子变化的因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;22(9):3130-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4348-4. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
10
Triangulating stapling technique covered with the pedicled omental flap for esophagogastric anastomosis: a safe anastomosis with fewer complications.带蒂网膜瓣覆盖的三角吻合技术用于食管胃吻合术:一种安全且并发症较少的吻合术。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Feb;220(2):e13-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.015. Epub 2014 Nov 4.