• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 PARADIGM-HF 试验相比,CHAMP-HF 注册研究中纳入患者的特征和治疗。

Characteristics and Treatments of Patients Enrolled in the CHAMP-HF Registry Compared With Patients Enrolled in the PARADIGM-HF Trial.

机构信息

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC

Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 12;7(12):e009237. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009237.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.118.009237
PMID:29895587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6220559/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The US Food and Drug Administration approved sacubitril/valsartan for patients with chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction in 2015 on the basis of the results of the PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI [Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor] With ACEI [Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor] to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) trial. There are limited data assessing the generalizability of PARADIGM-HF trial participants to a broader population of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction routinely encountered in outpatient clinical practice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared the baseline characteristics of patients in the PARADIGM-HF trial with those in the CHAMP-HF (Change the Management of Patients With Heart Failure) study a large US outpatient registry of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Patients in the PARADIGM-HF trial (n=8442) were similar to those in the CHAMP-HF registry (n=3497) in terms of age (mean, 64 versus 66 years), sex (22% versus 29% women), New York Heart Association class III to IV (25% versus 32%), systolic blood pressure (mean, 121 versus 121 mm Hg), left ventricular ejection fraction (mean, 29% versus 29%), and other key baseline characteristics. The median (25th-75 percentile) Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure risk scores were similar for the 2 studies (20 [16-24] versus 22 [8-27]). Despite this, only 13% of patients in the CHAMP-HF registry were prescribed sacubitril/valsartan at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest participants randomized in the PARADIGM-HF trial have similar baseline characteristics to those encountered in routine outpatient clinical practice, but there is a substantial lag in the adoption of sacubitril/valsartan for patients with chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction.

摘要

背景

美国食品和药物管理局于 2015 年基于 PARADIGM-HF(沙库巴曲缬沙坦与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的前瞻性比较试验)的研究结果批准了沙库巴曲缬沙坦用于射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭(HF)患者。目前,评估 PARADIGM-HF 试验参与者是否可推广至在门诊临床实践中更为常见的射血分数降低的 HF 患者人群的相关数据十分有限。

方法和结果

我们将 PARADIGM-HF 试验患者的基线特征与 CHAMP-HF(心力衰竭患者管理的改变)研究(一项大型美国射血分数降低的 HF 门诊患者注册研究)进行了比较。PARADIGM-HF 试验(n=8442)患者与 CHAMP-HF 登记患者(n=3497)在年龄(平均 64 岁比 66 岁)、性别(22%比 29%为女性)、纽约心脏协会心功能分级 III 至 IV 级(25%比 32%)、收缩压(平均 121mmHg 比 121mmHg)、左心室射血分数(平均 29%比 29%)和其他关键基线特征方面相似。这两项研究的中位数(25 分位数至 75 分位数)Meta 分析全球慢性心力衰竭风险评分相似(20[16-24]比 22[8-27])。尽管如此,CHAMP-HF 登记患者中仅有 13%在基线时处方了沙库巴曲缬沙坦。

结论

这些数据表明,PARADIGM-HF 试验中随机分组的患者具有与常规门诊临床实践中相似的基线特征,但在为射血分数降低的慢性 HF 患者应用沙库巴曲缬沙坦方面存在明显滞后。

相似文献

1
Characteristics and Treatments of Patients Enrolled in the CHAMP-HF Registry Compared With Patients Enrolled in the PARADIGM-HF Trial.与 PARADIGM-HF 试验相比,CHAMP-HF 注册研究中纳入患者的特征和治疗。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 12;7(12):e009237. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009237.
2
Influence of Ejection Fraction on Outcomes and Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: The Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) Trial.射血分数对沙库巴曲缬沙坦(LCZ696)治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的疗效及预后的影响:ARNI与ACEI对心力衰竭全球死亡率和发病率影响的前瞻性比较(PARADIGM-HF)试验
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;9(3):e002744. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002744.
3
"Real World" Eligibility for Sacubitril/Valsartan in Unselected Heart Failure Patients: Data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry.“真实世界”中沙库巴曲缬沙坦在未经选择的心衰患者中的使用情况:来自瑞典心衰注册登记研究的数据。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2019 Jun;33(3):315-322. doi: 10.1007/s10557-019-06873-1.
4
Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor for Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Real-World Experience From Taiwan.血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂用于射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者:来自台湾的真实世界经验
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Mar;25(2):152-157. doi: 10.1177/1074248419872958. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
5
Representativeness of the PIONEER-HF Clinical Trial Population in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.PIONEER-HF 临床试验人群在因心力衰竭和射血分数降低而住院的患者中的代表性。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Apr;13(4):e006645. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006645. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
6
The eligible population of the PARADIGM-HF trial in a real-world outpatient clinic and its cardiovascular risk between 2005 and 2016.PARADIGM-HF 试验在真实世界的门诊环境中的合格人群及其 2005 年至 2016 年期间的心血管风险。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2020 Jan;21(1):6-12. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000889.
7
Patient, Provider, and Practice Characteristics Associated With Sacubitril/Valsartan Use in the United States.与美国沙库巴曲缬沙坦使用相关的患者、提供者和实践特征。
Circ Heart Fail. 2018 Sep;11(9):e005400. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005400.
8
Profile of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of heart failure: patient selection and perspectives.沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗心力衰竭的概况:患者选择及展望
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 Oct 5;13:369-382. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S114784. eCollection 2017.
9
Real-world treatment switching to sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A cohort study.射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者实际应用中转换为沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗:一项队列研究。
Open Heart. 2020 Oct;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001305.
10
Characteristics and Healthcare Utilization Among Veterans Treated for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Who Switched to Sacubitril/Valsartan.接受沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗的射血分数降低型心力衰竭退伍军人的特征和医疗保健利用情况。
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Nov;12(11):e005691. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005691. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel device therapies in heart failure: focus on patient selection.心力衰竭的新型器械治疗:关注患者选择。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Feb 25;12:1419873. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1419873. eCollection 2025.
2
Aspirin and Hemocompatibility After LVAD Implantation in Patients With Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: A Secondary Analysis From the ARIES-HM3 Randomized Clinical Trial.阿司匹林与动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病患者左心室辅助装置植入后的血液相容性:来自ARIES-HM3随机临床试验的二次分析
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Mar 1;10(3):235-242. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4849.
3
Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy After Hospitalization for Acute Heart Failure: Insights From the CONNECT-HF.急性心力衰竭住院后的指南导向性药物治疗:来自CONNECT-HF研究的见解
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Dec 17;13(24):e036998. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036998. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
4
The PONTE (PDTA FOR INTEGRATED FOLLOW-UP TERRITORY HOSPITAL OF THE PATIENT WITH CARDIAC HEART FAILURE) (BRIDGE) Heart Failure project: increased adherence to guideline-recommended therapies through web-based shared clinical database.PONTE(心力衰竭患者综合随访区域医院的患者数据跟踪与分析)(桥梁)心力衰竭项目:通过基于网络的共享临床数据库提高对指南推荐疗法的依从性。
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2022 May 18;24(Suppl C):C221-C224. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suac019. eCollection 2022 May.
5
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide testing patterns in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者的 N 末端 pro-B 型利钠肽检测模式。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Feb;9(1):87-99. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13749. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
6
PRospective Evaluation of natriuretic peptide-based reFERral of patients with chronic heart failure in primary care (PREFER): a real-world study.基于利钠肽的慢性心力衰竭患者在初级保健中的转诊评估(PREFER):一项真实世界研究。
Open Heart. 2021 Oct;8(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001630.
7
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction After a Recent Worsening Heart Failure Event.近期心力衰竭恶化事件后射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的特征和结局。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Sep 7;10(17):e021276. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.021276. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
8
Sacubitril/valsartan in real-life European patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.真实世界中射血分数降低的心力衰竭欧洲患者使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦:系统评价和荟萃分析。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;8(5):3547-3556. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13547. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
9
Factors associated with non-use and sub-target dosing of medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.与射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者未使用和未达目标剂量药物治疗相关的因素。
Heart Fail Rev. 2022 May;27(3):741-753. doi: 10.1007/s10741-021-10077-x. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
10
Telemedicine in Heart Failure during COVID-19: Like it, Love It or Lose It?2019冠状病毒病期间心力衰竭的远程医疗:喜欢、热爱还是摒弃?
Heart Lung. 2020 Nov-Dec;49(6):A11-A12. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.10.014.

本文引用的文献

1
Rationale and design of the comParIson Of sacubitril/valsartaN versus Enalapril on Effect on nt-pRo-bnp in patients stabilized from an acute Heart Failure episode (PIONEER-HF) trial.比较沙库巴曲缬沙坦与依那普利对急性心力衰竭稳定后患者 NT-proBNP 影响的 comParIson Of sacubitril/valsartaN 与 Enalapril (PIONEER-HF)试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2018 Apr;198:145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
2
Rationale and design of TRANSITION: a randomized trial of pre-discharge vs. post-discharge initiation of sacubitril/valsartan.背景和设计:TRANSITION 研究:随机比较出院前与出院后起始沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗的研究。
ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Apr;5(2):327-336. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12246. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
3
Change the management of patients with heart failure: Rationale and design of the CHAMP-HF registry.改变心力衰竭患者的管理:CHAMP-HF注册研究的基本原理与设计
Am Heart J. 2017 Jul;189:177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
4
Patients Not Meeting PARADIGM-HF Enrollment Criteria Are Eligible for Sacubitril/Valsartan on the Basis of FDA Approval: The Need to Close the Gap.未达到PARADIGM-HF纳入标准的患者基于美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的批准有资格使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦:缩小差距的必要性。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Jun;5(6):460-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.03.007.
5
Scope of Sacubitril/Valsartan Eligibility After Heart Failure Hospitalization: Findings From the GWTG-HF Registry (Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure).心力衰竭住院后沙库巴曲缬沙坦的适用范围:来自GWTG-HF注册研究(遵循指南-心力衰竭)的结果
Circulation. 2017 May 23;135(21):2077-2080. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027773.
6
2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America.2017年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国心力衰竭学会对2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会心力衰竭管理指南的重点更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南特别工作组及美国心力衰竭学会的报告
Circulation. 2017 Aug 8;136(6):e137-e161. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000509. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
7
Early Adoption of Sacubitril/Valsartan for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights From Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF).沙库巴曲缬沙坦在射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中的早期应用:来自“遵循指南-心力衰竭(GWTG-HF)”的见解。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Apr;5(4):305-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.12.018.
8
ACC/AHA Special Report: Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Strategies: A Summary of Systematic Reviews by the NHLBI Implementation Science Work Group: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会特别报告:临床实践指南实施策略:国家心肺血液研究所实施科学工作组系统评价总结:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组的报告。
Circulation. 2017 Feb 28;135(9):e122-e137. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000481. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
9
Comparing LCZ696 with enalapril according to baseline risk using the MAGGIC and EMPHASIS-HF risk scores: an analysis of mortality and morbidity in PARADIGM-HF.根据 MAGGIC 和 EMPHASIS-HF 风险评分,根据基线风险比较 LCZ696 与依那普利:PARADIGM-HF 中的死亡率和发病率分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Nov 10;66(19):2059-2071. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.878.
10
Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure.血管紧张素-脑啡肽酶抑制剂与依那普利治疗心力衰竭的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):993-1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409077. Epub 2014 Aug 30.