Assari Shervin, Moghani Lankarani Maryam
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA.
Healthcare (Basel). 2018 Jun 12;6(2):62. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6020062.
Living above the poverty line reduces the risk of physical illnesses, including childhood asthma (CA). Minorities’ Diminished Return theory, however, suggests that the protective effects of socioeconomic status (SES) on health are weaker for racial minorities than White families. It is unknown whether the association between SES and CA differs for White and Black families. Using a national sample, the current study compared Black and White families for the association between living above the poverty line and CA. Data came from the National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH), 2003⁻2004, a national telephone survey. A total of 86,537 Black or White families with children (17 years old or younger) were included in the study. This sample was composed of 76,403 White (88.29%) and 10,134 Black (11.71%) families. Family SES (living above the poverty line) was the independent variable. The outcome was CA, reported by the parent. Age, gender, and childhood obesity were the covariates. Race was conceptualized as the moderator. A number of multivariable logistic regressions were used in the pooled sample and specific to each race for data analysis. In the pooled sample, living above the poverty line was associated with lower odds of CA. An interaction was found between race and living above the poverty line on odds of CA, indicating a smaller association for Black compared to White families. Although race-stratified logistic regressions showed negative associations between living above the poverty line and CA in both White and Black families, the magnitude of this negative association was larger for White than Black families. The health gain from living above the poverty line may be smaller for Black than White families. Due to the existing Minorities’ Diminished Return, policies that merely reduce the racial gap in SES may not be sufficient in eliminating racial health disparities in the United States. Public policies must go beyond reducing poverty to address structural and environmental risk factors that disproportionately impact Blacks’ health. Policies should help Black families gain health as they gain upward social mobility. As they are more likely to face societal and structural barriers, multi-level interventions are needed for the health promotion of Blacks.
生活在贫困线以上可降低患身体疾病的风险,包括儿童哮喘(CA)。然而,少数族裔回报递减理论表明,社会经济地位(SES)对健康的保护作用,对少数族裔而言比对白人家庭更弱。尚不清楚SES与CA之间的关联在白人家庭和黑人家庭中是否存在差异。本研究使用全国样本,比较了贫困线以上生活状况与CA在黑人和白人家庭中的关联。数据来自2003 - 2004年全国儿童健康调查(NSCH),这是一项全国性电话调查。共有86,537个有17岁及以下子女的黑人和白人家庭纳入本研究。该样本由76,403个白人家庭(88.29%)和10,134个黑人家庭(11.71%)组成。家庭SES(生活在贫困线以上)为自变量。结果变量是家长报告的CA。年龄、性别和儿童肥胖为协变量。种族被概念化为调节变量。在汇总样本以及按种族分别进行数据分析时,使用了多个多变量逻辑回归。在汇总样本中,生活在贫困线以上与CA的较低发病几率相关。发现种族与贫困线以上生活状况在CA发病几率上存在交互作用,表明与白人家庭相比,黑人家庭的关联较小。尽管按种族分层的逻辑回归显示,贫困线以上生活状况与白人家庭和黑人家庭的CA均呈负相关,但这种负相关的程度白人家庭大于黑人家庭。贫困线以上生活带来的健康收益,黑人家庭可能比白人家庭小。由于存在少数族裔回报递减现象,仅缩小SES种族差距的政策可能不足以消除美国的种族健康差异。公共政策必须超越减少贫困,去解决对黑人健康影响尤甚的结构性和环境风险因素。政策应帮助黑人家庭在实现社会向上流动的同时增进健康。鉴于他们更可能面临社会和结构性障碍,需要采取多层次干预措施来促进黑人的健康。