• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性胰腺炎严重程度分层的传统评分系统是否足够?

Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient?

作者信息

Kiat Thaddaeus Tan Jun, Gunasekaran Sivaraj K, Junnarkar Sameer P, Low Jee Keem, Woon Winston, Shelat Vishal G

机构信息

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2018 May;22(2):105-115. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.2.105. Epub 2018 May 30.

DOI:10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.2.105
PMID:29896571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5981140/
Abstract

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Ranson's score (RS) and Glasgow score (GS) have been utilized to stratify the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). The aim of this study was to validate RS and GS for stratifying the severity of acute pancreatitis and audit our experience of managing AP.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated for AP from July 2009 to September 2016. Final severity was determined using the revised Atlanta classification. Mortality and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

From July 2009 to September 2016, a total of 675 patients with a diagnosis of AP were admitted at the hospital. Of them, 669 patients who had sufficient data were analyzed. Their average age±SD was 58.7±17.4 years (range, 21-98 years). There was a male preponderance (n=393, 53.8%). A total of 82 (12.3%) patients had eventual severe pancreatitis. RS demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 52.8% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 21.5% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.1%. GS demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.8% and a specificity of 69.2% with a PPV of 25.8% and a NPV of 95.5%. For severity prediction, areas under the curve (AUCs) for RS and GS were 0.848 (95% CI: 0.819-0.875) and 0.784 (95% CI: 0.750-0.814), respectively (=0.003). Twelve (1.6%) patients died in the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

RS has higher sensitivity, NPV and AUC for predicting severity of AP than GS.

摘要

背景/目的:兰森评分(RS)和格拉斯哥评分(GS)已被用于对急性胰腺炎(AP)的严重程度进行分层。本研究的目的是验证RS和GS在对急性胰腺炎严重程度进行分层方面的有效性,并总结我们管理AP的经验。

方法

我们对2009年7月至2016年9月期间接受AP治疗的患者进行了回顾性研究。最终严重程度采用修订的亚特兰大分类法确定。分析死亡率和并发症情况。

结果

2009年7月至2016年9月,共有675例诊断为AP的患者入院。其中,对669例有足够数据的患者进行了分析。他们的平均年龄±标准差为58.7±17.4岁(范围21 - 98岁)。男性占优势(n = 393,53.8%)。共有82例(12.3%)患者最终发展为重症胰腺炎。RS的敏感性为92.7%,特异性为52.8%,阳性预测值(PPV)为21.5%,阴性预测值(NPV)为98.1%。GS的敏感性为76.8%,特异性为69.2%,PPV为25.8%,NPV为95.5%。对于严重程度预测,RS和GS的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.848(95%CI:0.819 - 0.875)和0.784(95%CI:0.750 - 0.814)(P = 0.003)。12例(1.6%)患者在医院死亡。

结论

在预测AP严重程度方面,RS比GS具有更高的敏感性、NPV和AUC。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a886/5981140/13d854e37d9f/ahbps-22-105-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a886/5981140/74b014c1a7e7/ahbps-22-105-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a886/5981140/d51c67fc5097/ahbps-22-105-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a886/5981140/7e50f17e2177/ahbps-22-105-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a886/5981140/13d854e37d9f/ahbps-22-105-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a886/5981140/74b014c1a7e7/ahbps-22-105-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a886/5981140/d51c67fc5097/ahbps-22-105-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a886/5981140/7e50f17e2177/ahbps-22-105-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a886/5981140/13d854e37d9f/ahbps-22-105-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient?急性胰腺炎严重程度分层的传统评分系统是否足够?
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2018 May;22(2):105-115. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.2.105. Epub 2018 May 30.
2
Comparison of the BISAP scores for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis in Chinese patients according to the latest Atlanta classification.根据最新亚特兰大分类法比较BISAP评分对中国急性胰腺炎患者严重程度的预测价值
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Sep;21(9):689-694. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.118. Epub 2014 May 22.
3
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis: A Prospective Observational Study.不同评分系统在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度中的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究
Cureus. 2020 Feb 10;12(2):e6943. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6943.
4
Comparison of BISAP, Ranson's, APACHE-II, and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis.比较 BISAP、Ranson's、APACHE-II 和 CTSI 评分在预测急性胰腺炎器官衰竭、并发症和死亡率中的作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;105(2):435-41; quiz 442. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.622. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
5
Ranson's criteria for acute pancreatitis in high altitude: do they need to be modified?高海拔地区急性胰腺炎的兰森标准:它们需要修改吗?
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jan;14(1):20-3. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.37797.
6
Comparison of different risk stratification systems for prediction of acute pancreatitis severity in patients referred to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital.比较不同风险分层系统对三级医院急诊科就诊患者急性胰腺炎严重程度的预测作用。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Jul;28(7):967-973. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.51892.
7
Comparison of Scoring Systems in Predicting Severity and Prognosis of Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis.预测高甘油三酯血症性急性胰腺炎严重程度和预后的评分系统比较
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Apr;65(4):1206-1211. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05827-9. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
8
Comparison of Harmless Acute Pancreatitis Score with Ranson's Score in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.无害性急性胰腺炎评分与兰森评分在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度方面的比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017 Feb;27(2):75-79.
9
[Diagnostic value of integral scoring systems in assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis and patient's condition].积分评分系统在评估急性胰腺炎严重程度及患者病情中的诊断价值
Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk. 2015(1):90-4. doi: 10.15690/vramn.v70i1.1236.
10
Accuracy of conventional and novel scoring systems in predicting severity and outcomes of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study.常规和新型评分系统在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度和结局中的准确性:一项回顾性研究。
Lipids Health Dis. 2021 Apr 27;20(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12944-021-01470-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Visceral obesity anthropometric indicators as predictors of acute pancreatitis severity.内脏肥胖人体测量指标作为急性胰腺炎严重程度的预测指标。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 11;12:1536090. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1536090. eCollection 2025.
2
Effectiveness of continuous intravenous insulin infusion in hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis of varying severity: A longitudinal study.持续静脉输注胰岛素治疗不同严重程度高甘油三酯血症性急性胰腺炎的有效性:一项纵向研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 30;104(22):e42674. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042674.
3
Evaluation of scoring systems and hematological parameters in the severity stratification of early-phase acute pancreatitis.

本文引用的文献

1
The utility of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and fluid sequestration as an early predictor of severe acute pancreatitis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和液体隔离作为重症急性胰腺炎早期预测指标的效用。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 6;7(1):10704. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10516-6.
2
BISAP, RANSON, lactate and others biomarkers in prediction of severe acute pancreatitis in a European cohort.BISAP、兰森标准、乳酸及其他生物标志物在欧洲队列中对重症急性胰腺炎的预测作用
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Sep;32(9):1649-1656. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13763.
3
Predicting Acute Pancreatitis Severity: Comparison of Prognostic Scores.
早期急性胰腺炎严重程度分层中评分系统和血液学参数的评估
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 21;31(15):105236. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i15.105236.
4
Heart rate variability in acute pancreatitis: a narrative review.急性胰腺炎中的心率变异性:一项叙述性综述。
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Aug 21;9:68. doi: 10.21037/tgh-24-22. eCollection 2024.
5
Practical approach to acute pancreatitis: from diagnosis to the management of complications.急性胰腺炎的实用方法:从诊断到并发症的处理。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;19(8):2091-2104. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03666-9. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
6
The Ongoing Debate on the Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Acute Pancreatitis-Is There a Conclusion? A Comprehensive Narrative Review.关于急性胰腺炎预防性使用抗生素的持续争论——有结论了吗?一项全面的叙述性综述。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Apr 30;13(5):411. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13050411.
7
Predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis: Current approaches and future directions.预测急性胰腺炎的严重程度:当前方法与未来方向。
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Mar 27;19:109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.03.012. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Establishment and Validation of a Nomogram Prediction Model for the Severe Acute Pancreatitis.重症急性胰腺炎列线图预测模型的建立与验证
J Inflamm Res. 2023 Jul 8;16:2831-2843. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S416411. eCollection 2023.
9
Is there a role for percutaneous needle aspiration in the multimodal management of pyogenic liver abscess?经皮穿刺针吸术在化脓性肝脓肿的多模式治疗中是否有作用?
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Jun 30;11(9):306. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-1385. Epub 2023 May 30.
10
Development and Validation of a Dynamic Nomogram for Predicting in-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the Intensive Care Unit.急性胰腺炎患者院内死亡预测动态列线图的开发与验证:重症监护病房的一项回顾性队列研究
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Jun 17;16:2541-2553. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S409812. eCollection 2023.
预测急性胰腺炎的严重程度:预后评分比较
Gastroenterology Res. 2011 Oct;4(5):216-222. doi: 10.4021/gr364w. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
4
Primary gallbladder lymphoma presenting with perforated cholecystitis and hyperamylasaemia.以穿孔性胆囊炎和高淀粉酶血症为表现的原发性胆囊淋巴瘤。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(2):e13-5. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0001. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
5
The predictive value of the prealbumin-to-fibrinogen ratio in patients with acute pancreatitis.前白蛋白与纤维蛋白原比值在急性胰腺炎患者中的预测价值。
Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Oct;69(10):1121-8. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12682. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
Early Achievable Severity (EASY) index for simple and accurate expedite risk stratification in acute pancreatitis.用于急性胰腺炎简单准确快速风险分层的早期可实现严重程度(EASY)指数。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2015 Jun;24(2):177-82. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.242.easy.
7
Validation of the modified Ranson versus Glasgow score for pancreatitis in a Singaporean population.改良兰森评分与格拉斯哥评分在新加坡人群中对胰腺炎的验证。
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Sep;87(9):700-703. doi: 10.1111/ans.13139. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
8
Comparison of scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis.预测急性胰腺炎严重程度的评分系统比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 28;21(8):2387-94. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2387.
9
Five year experience in management of perforated peptic ulcer and validation of common mortality risk prediction models - are existing models sufficient? A retrospective cohort study.穿孔性消化性溃疡的五年管理经验及常见死亡风险预测模型的验证 - 现有模型是否足够?一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2015 Feb;14:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
10
Severe acute pancreatitis admitted to intensive care unit: SOFA is superior to Ranson's criteria and APACHE II in determining prognosis.入住重症监护病房的重症急性胰腺炎:序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)在判断预后方面优于兰森标准和急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2013;24(5):430-5. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2013.0761.