• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美学区上颌单颗氧化锆种植体的美学评价

Esthetic Evaluation of Maxillary Single-Tooth Zirconia Implants in the Esthetic Zone.

作者信息

Kniha Kristian, Kniha Heinz, Grunert Ingrid, Edelhoff Daniel, Hölzle Frank, Modabber Ali

出版信息

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019 September/October;39(5):e195–e201. doi: 10.11607/prd.3282. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

DOI:10.11607/prd.3282
PMID:29897352
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate ceramic dental implants using different esthetic scores. A total of 53 ceramic dental implants were evaluated using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES), White Esthetic Score (WES), and Peri-Implant and Crown Index (PICI). Prosthodontists, orthodontists, oral surgeons, and dentistry students independently performed assessments. The mean value of combined PES + WES was 17.4 points, and the PICI was 523.2 points. Orthodontists assessed a significantly lower result in both indices compared to all other assessor groups (P ≤ .05). Patient satisfaction was very high. The esthetic scores around ceramic implants were considerably higher than the suggested threshold of clinical acceptability.

摘要

本研究的目的是使用不同的美学评分来评估陶瓷牙种植体。共使用粉色美学评分(PES)、白色美学评分(WES)和种植体周围及牙冠指数(PICI)对53颗陶瓷牙种植体进行了评估。修复科医生、正畸科医生、口腔外科医生和牙科专业学生独立进行评估。PES + WES的平均值为17.4分,PICI为523.2分。与所有其他评估组相比,正畸科医生对这两个指数的评估结果明显更低(P≤0.05)。患者满意度非常高。陶瓷种植体周围的美学评分明显高于临床可接受性的建议阈值。

相似文献

1
Esthetic Evaluation of Maxillary Single-Tooth Zirconia Implants in the Esthetic Zone.美学区上颌单颗氧化锆种植体的美学评价
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019 September/October;39(5):e195–e201. doi: 10.11607/prd.3282. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
2
Evaluation of the influence exerted by different dental specialty backgrounds and measuring instrument reproducibility on esthetic aspects of maxillary implant-supported single crown.评估不同牙科专业背景和测量仪器重复性对上颌种植单冠美学方面的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):250-6. doi: 10.1111/clr.12532. Epub 2014 Dec 14.
3
Esthetic Evaluation of Implant Crowns and Peri-Implant Soft Tissue in the Anterior Maxilla: Comparison and Reproducibility of Three Different Indices.上颌前部种植体冠与种植体周围软组织的美学评价:三种不同指数的比较及可重复性
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Jun;18(3):517-26. doi: 10.1111/cid.12306. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
4
Patient satisfaction and esthetic outcome after immediate placement and provisionalization of single-tooth implants involving a definitive individual abutment.单颗牙种植体即刻植入并使用定制个性化基台进行临时修复后的患者满意度及美学效果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Nov;25(11):1245-1250. doi: 10.1111/clr.12260. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
5
Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores.使用客观美学标准对早期植入的上颌前牙单颗种植体进行疗效评估:一项横断面回顾性研究,对45例患者进行了2至4年的随访,并采用了粉红美学评分和白色美学评分。
J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):140-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080435.
6
Esthetic outcome evaluation of maxillary anterior single-tooth bone-level implants with metal or ceramic abutments and ceramic crowns.采用金属或陶瓷基台及陶瓷牙冠的上颌前牙单颗骨水平种植体的美学效果评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Sep-Oct;29(5):1130-6. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3439.
7
Esthetic and Clinical Performance of Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Crowns Made with Prefabricated or CAD/CAM Zirconia Abutments: A Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial.预制或 CAD/CAM 氧化锆基台制作的种植体支持全瓷冠的美观和临床效果:一项随机、多中心临床试验。
J Dent Res. 2017 Feb;96(2):163-170. doi: 10.1177/0022034516681767. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
8
Comparing pink and white esthetic scores to layperson perception in the single-tooth implant patient.在单颗牙种植患者中,比较粉色和白色美学评分与外行人的认知。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Nov-Dec;29(6):1348-53. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3785.
9
Esthetic outcomes with porcelain-fused-to-ceramic and all-ceramic single-implant crowns: a randomized clinical trial.全瓷和烤瓷熔附金属单冠修复体的美学效果:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jan;22(1):62-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01997.x. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
10
Patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements performed by dental students: a retrospective evaluation 8 to 12 years after treatment.牙科学生进行的种植体支持的单颗牙修复的患者满意度和美学效果:治疗后8至12年的回顾性评估
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013 Winter;6(4):387-95.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival and success of zirconia compared with titanium implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.氧化锆与钛种植体的生存和成功率比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Nov;27(11):6279-6290. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05242-5. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
2
Clinical performance of zirconium implants compared to titanium implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.氧化锆种植体与钛种植体的临床性能比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PeerJ. 2023 Mar 17;11:e15010. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15010. eCollection 2023.
3
Failure Load and Fatigue Behavior of Monolithic and Bi-Layer Zirconia Fixed Dental Prostheses Bonded to One-Piece Zirconia Implants.
粘结于一体式氧化锆种植体的整体式和双层氧化锆固定义齿的破坏载荷与疲劳行为
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 28;15(23):8465. doi: 10.3390/ma15238465.
4
Comparison of the amount of artifacts induced by zirconium and titanium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images.比较锥形束计算机断层摄影图像中锆和钛植入物引起的伪影量。
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Sep 3;22(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00884-5.
5
In vivo and in vitro analysis in a rat model using zoledronate and alendronate medication: microbiological and scanning electron microscopy findings on peri-implant rat tissue.在使用唑来膦酸和阿仑膦酸钠药物的大鼠模型中的体内和体外分析:种植体周围大鼠组织的微生物学和扫描电子显微镜检查结果。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Dec 31;21(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-02031-y.
6
Zirconium dioxide implants as an alternative to titanium: A systematic review.二氧化锆植入物作为钛的替代品:一项系统评价。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 May 1;13(5):e511-e519. doi: 10.4317/jced.58063. eCollection 2021 May.
7
The Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration and Biofilm Formation.牙种植体表面改性对骨结合和生物膜形成的影响。
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 12;10(8):1641. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081641.
8
Relationship between Implant Geometry and Primary Stability in Different Bony Defects and Variant Bone Densities: An In Vitro Study.不同骨缺损和不同骨密度下种植体几何形状与初期稳定性的关系:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 30;13(19):4349. doi: 10.3390/ma13194349.
9
A Prospective Clinical Cohort Investigation on Zirconia Implants: 5-Year Results.一项关于氧化锆种植体的前瞻性临床队列研究:5年结果。
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 10;9(8):2585. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082585.
10
Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Oral Implants In Vitro: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.氧化锆口腔种植体的体外抗折性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 24;13(3):562. doi: 10.3390/ma13030562.