Bethke Annalena, Pieralli Stefano, Kohal Ralf-Joachim, Burkhardt Felix, von Stein-Lausnitz Manja, Vach Kirstin, Spies Benedikt Christopher
Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Dental Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 24;13(3):562. doi: 10.3390/ma13030562.
Various protocols are available to preclinically assess the fracture resistance of zirconia oral implants. The objective of the present review was to determine the impact of different treatments (dynamic loading, hydrothermal aging) and implant features (e.g., material, design or manufacturing) on the fracture resistance of zirconia implants. An electronic screening of two databases (MEDLINE/Pubmed, Embase) was performed. Investigations including > 5 screw-shaped implants providing information to calculate the bending moment at the time point of static loading to fracture were considered. Data was extracted and meta-analyses were conducted using multilevel mixed-effects generalized linear models (GLMs). The Šidák method was used to correct for multiple testing. The initial search resulted in 1864 articles, and finally 19 investigations loading 731 zirconia implants to fracture were analyzed. In general, fracture resistance was affected by the implant design (1-piece > 2-piece, = 0.004), material (alumina-toughened zirconia/ATZ > yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal/Y-TZP, = 0.002) and abutment preparation (untouched > modified/grinded, < 0.001). In case of 2-piece implants, the amount of dynamic loading cycles prior to static loading ( < 0.001) or anatomical crown supply ( < 0.001) negatively affected the outcome. No impact was found for hydrothermal aging. Heterogeneous findings of the present review highlight the importance of thoroughly and individually evaluating the fracture resistance of every zirconia implant system prior to market release.
有多种方案可用于临床前评估氧化锆口腔种植体的抗断裂性。本综述的目的是确定不同处理(动态加载、水热老化)和种植体特征(如材料、设计或制造)对氧化锆种植体抗断裂性的影响。对两个数据库(MEDLINE/Pubmed、Embase)进行了电子筛选。纳入了包括>5个螺旋形种植体的研究,这些研究提供了在静态加载至断裂时间点计算弯矩的信息。提取数据并使用多级混合效应广义线性模型(GLMs)进行荟萃分析。采用Šidák方法校正多重检验。初步检索得到1864篇文章,最终分析了19项将731个氧化锆种植体加载至断裂的研究。总体而言,抗断裂性受种植体设计(一体式>两件式,P = 0.004)、材料(氧化铝增韧氧化锆/ATZ>钇稳定四方多晶氧化锆/Y-TZP,P = 0.002)和基台制备(未处理>改良/研磨,P<0.001)的影响。对于两件式种植体,静态加载前的动态加载循环次数(P<0.001)或解剖冠供应(P<0.001)对结果有负面影响。未发现水热老化有影响。本综述的异质性结果突出了在市场发布前对每个氧化锆种植体系统的抗断裂性进行全面和单独评估的重要性。