Suppr超能文献

跨情节的项目表示中的神经重叠会损害上下文记忆。

Neural Overlap in Item Representations Across Episodes Impairs Context Memory.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.

Department of Psychology, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2019 Jun 1;29(6):2682-2693. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy137.

Abstract

We frequently encounter the same item in different contexts, and when that happens, memories of earlier encounters can get reactivated. We examined how existing memories are changed as a result of such reactivation. We hypothesized that when an item's initial and subsequent neural representations overlap, this allows the initial item to become associated with novel contextual information, interfering with later retrieval of the initial context. Specifically, we predicted a negative relationship between representational similarity across repeated experiences of an item and subsequent source memory for the initial context. We tested this hypothesis in an fMRI study, in which objects were presented multiple times during different tasks. We measured the similarity of the neural patterns in lateral occipital cortex that were elicited by the first and second presentations of objects, and related this neural overlap score to subsequent source memory. Consistent with our hypothesis, greater item-specific pattern similarity was linked to worse source memory for the initial task. In contrast, greater reactivation of the initial context was associated with better source memory. Our findings suggest that the influence of novel experiences on an existing context memory depends on how reliably a shared component (i.e., item) is represented across these episodes.

摘要

我们经常在不同的情境中遇到相同的项目,当这种情况发生时,早期的记忆就会被重新激活。我们研究了这种重新激活是如何改变现有记忆的。我们假设,当一个项目的初始和后续神经表示重叠时,这允许初始项目与新的上下文信息相关联,从而干扰初始上下文的后续检索。具体来说,我们预测在一个项目的重复经历中,代表相似性与初始上下文的后续来源记忆之间存在负相关关系。我们在一项 fMRI 研究中检验了这一假设,在该研究中,物体在不同的任务中多次呈现。我们测量了由物体的第一次和第二次呈现引起的外侧枕叶皮层中神经模式的相似性,并将这种神经重叠分数与随后的来源记忆相关联。与我们的假设一致,更大的项目特定模式相似性与初始任务的来源记忆较差相关。相比之下,初始上下文的更大再激活与更好的来源记忆相关。我们的发现表明,新经验对现有上下文记忆的影响取决于在这些情况下共享组件(即项目)的表示方式的可靠性。

相似文献

1
Neural Overlap in Item Representations Across Episodes Impairs Context Memory.
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Jun 1;29(6):2682-2693. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy137.
2
Neural Differentiation of Incorrectly Predicted Memories.
J Neurosci. 2017 Feb 22;37(8):2022-2031. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3272-16.2017. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
3
Cognitive tasks affect the relationship between representational pattern similarity and subsequent item memory in the hippocampus.
Neuroimage. 2023 Aug 15;277:120241. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120241. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
4
Cortical Overlap and Cortical-Hippocampal Interactions Predict Subsequent True and False Memory.
J Neurosci. 2020 Feb 26;40(9):1920-1930. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1766-19.2020. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
5
Decomposing Parietal Memory Reactivation to Predict Consequences of Remembering.
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Jul 22;29(8):3305-3318. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy200.
7
Greater neural pattern similarity across repetitions is associated with better memory.
Science. 2010 Oct 1;330(6000):97-101. doi: 10.1126/science.1193125. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
8
Neural Global Pattern Similarity Underlies True and False Memories.
J Neurosci. 2016 Jun 22;36(25):6792-802. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0425-16.2016.
10
Transformed Neural Pattern Reinstatement during Episodic Memory Retrieval.
J Neurosci. 2017 Mar 15;37(11):2986-2998. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2324-16.2017. Epub 2017 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the learning of stimulus-control associations through incidental memory of reinforcement events.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Oct;47(10):1599-1621. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001058. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
2
Reinstatement of item-specific contextual details during retrieval supports recombination-related false memories.
Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 1;236:118033. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118033. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
3
Multiple Exposures Enhance Both Item Memory and Contextual Memory Over Time.
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 1;11:565169. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565169. eCollection 2020.
4
Repeated encoding fosters retention of perceptual detail in visual recognition memory.
Learn Mem. 2020 Oct 15;27(11):457-461. doi: 10.1101/lm.052209.120. Print 2020 Nov.
5
Predicting memory formation over multiple study episodes.
Learn Mem. 2019 Nov 15;26(12):465-472. doi: 10.1101/lm.049791.119. Print 2019 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal Proximity Promotes Integration of Overlapping Events.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Aug;29(8):1311-1323. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01116. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
2
Lingering representations of stimuli influence recall organization.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Mar;97:72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.029. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
3
Neural Differentiation of Incorrectly Predicted Memories.
J Neurosci. 2017 Feb 22;37(8):2022-2031. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3272-16.2017. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
5
Predicting the integration of overlapping memories by decoding mnemonic processing states during learning.
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):323-335. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.051. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
6
Attention Stabilizes Representations in the Human Hippocampus.
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Feb;26(2):783-796. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv041. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
7
Pruning of memories by context-based prediction error.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 17;111(24):8997-9002. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319438111. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
8
9
Critical issues in interference theory.
Mem Cognit. 1973 Mar;1(1):19-40. doi: 10.3758/BF03198064.
10
Neural mechanisms of reactivation-induced updating that enhance and distort memory.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 3;110(49):19671-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319630110. Epub 2013 Nov 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验