Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, United Kingdom.
Gerontologist. 2019 Jul 16;59(4):e294-e310. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny029.
Few studies have recommended the essential domains of healthy aging and their relevant measurement to assess healthy aging comprehensively. This review is to fill the gap, by conducting a literature review of domains and measures of healthy aging in epidemiological studies.
A literature search was conducted up to March 31, 2017, supplemented by a search of references in all relevant articles in English. We made a final selection of 50 studies across 23 countries or regions.
Nineteen studies applied Rowe and Kahn's three standards to assess healthy aging. Thirty-seven studies measured physical capabilities mainly by (instrumental) activities of daily living. Cognitive functions were included in 33 studies. Nineteen of them applied Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Twenty-six studies considered metabolic and physiological health, but they mainly asked the self-reported absence of diseases. Twenty-four studies assessed psychological well-being by employing diverse scales. Questions about participation in social activities were mainly asked to measure social well-being in 22 studies. Sixteen studies considered individuals' general health status, which was mainly measured by self-rated health. Security questions were asked in five studies. Health behaviors were taken into account by three studies. Fifteen studies either applied SF-12/36 or developed health indices to assess healthy aging.
This review summarizes detailed scales or methods that have been used to assess healthy aging in previous epidemiological studies. It also discusses and recommends the essential domains of healthy aging, and the relevant instruments for further epidemiological research to use in the assessment of healthy aging.
很少有研究推荐健康老龄化的基本领域及其相关测量方法,以全面评估健康老龄化。本综述旨在通过对流行病学研究中健康老龄化的领域和测量方法进行文献回顾,填补这一空白。
截至 2017 年 3 月 31 日进行了文献检索,并补充了所有相关英文文章的参考文献检索。我们在 23 个国家或地区进行了最终选择,共选择了 50 项研究。
19 项研究应用 Rowe 和 Kahn 的三项标准评估健康老龄化。37 项研究主要通过(工具)日常生活活动能力来衡量身体能力。认知功能包括在 33 项研究中。其中 19 项应用了简易精神状态检查(MMSE)。26 项研究考虑了代谢和生理健康,但主要询问自我报告的无疾病。24 项研究通过使用各种量表评估心理幸福感。22 项研究主要通过询问参与社会活动的问题来衡量社会幸福感。16 项研究考虑了个体的一般健康状况,主要通过自我报告的健康状况来衡量。五项研究提出了安全问题。三项研究考虑了健康行为。15 项研究应用 SF-12/36 或开发健康指数来评估健康老龄化。
本综述总结了以前流行病学研究中用于评估健康老龄化的详细量表或方法。它还讨论并推荐了健康老龄化的基本领域,以及进一步进行流行病学研究时评估健康老龄化的相关工具。