van Galen Danny J M, Martins Costa Ana, Siche-Pantel Franziska, Kemper Ruth, Rochow Niels, Brandani Maria, Halfwerk Frank R, Arens Jutta
From the Engineering Organ Support Technologies, Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technologies, Technical Medical (TechMed) Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Policy and Advocacy Department, European Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants (EFCNI), Munich, Germany.
ASAIO J. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002443.
Preterm birth remains the leading cause of mortality among neonates. Despite improvements in neonatal intensive care over the years, current treatments for lung and kidney failure are highly invasive, associated with lifelong disability, and limit family integration. Artificial womb and artificial placenta technologies offer a promising alternative by providing more tailored and less invasive neonatal care. Although these technologies share some similarities, artificial womb and artificial placenta technologies differ significantly in terms of treatment initiation, treatment environment, and the potential to support family-centered care. Moreover, even though acute kidney injury is common in neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients, current artificial placenta and artificial womb devices lack renal support functionality. Most artificial womb and artificial placenta studies focus on the technical feasibility of these technologies based on in-vivo animal tests. However, translation toward envisioned use of these devices in preterm neonates remains mostly underexposed. A comprehensive stakeholder analysis, including parents and caregivers, is critical to the development of socially acceptable artificial placenta and artificial womb systems. This state-of-the-art review provides an overview of conventional neonatal lung and kidney treatments, delineates the differences between artificial womb and placenta technologies, and addresses the technological and ethical challenges in advancing these technologies toward potential clinical implementation.
早产仍然是新生儿死亡的主要原因。尽管多年来新生儿重症监护有所改善,但目前针对肺和肾衰竭的治疗具有高度侵入性,会导致终身残疾,并且限制了家庭团聚。人工子宫和人工胎盘技术通过提供更具针对性且侵入性较小的新生儿护理,提供了一种有前景的替代方案。尽管这些技术有一些相似之处,但人工子宫和人工胎盘技术在治疗起始、治疗环境以及支持以家庭为中心的护理的潜力方面存在显著差异。此外,尽管急性肾损伤在新生儿体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)患者中很常见,但目前的人工胎盘和人工子宫装置缺乏肾脏支持功能。大多数人工子宫和人工胎盘研究都集中在基于体内动物试验的这些技术的技术可行性上。然而,将这些装置用于早产新生儿的设想用途的转化大多仍未得到充分探讨。包括父母和护理人员在内的全面利益相关者分析对于开发社会可接受的人工胎盘和人工子宫系统至关重要。这篇综述提供了传统新生儿肺和肾治疗的概述,阐述了人工子宫和胎盘技术之间的差异,并探讨了将这些技术推进到潜在临床应用中的技术和伦理挑战。