Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, Amsterdam, 1007 MB, the Netherlands.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 14;18(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1880-4.
Major concerns of pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus are an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome. The objective of this study was to analyse the rate of fetal distress during labor in women with type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes compared to control women.
A retrospective case-cohort study was conducted at the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; a tertiary care hospital. 117 women with type 1 diabetes, 59 women with type 2 diabetes, 303 women with gestational diabetes and 15,260 control women were included, who delivered between March 2004 and February 2014. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to compare maternal and pregnancy characteristics. Risk of fetal distress and perinatal asphyxia was assessed by multiple regression analyses, adjusted for confounding factors as age, smoking, parity, previous cesarean section, hypertensive disorder, pre-eclampsia, prematurity, induction of labor and macrosomia. Main outcome measure was fetal distress, defined either as clinical indication for instrumental or cesarean delivery; or low umbilical artery pH (UA pH), or admission to neonatal unit (NU).
The indication for instrumental or cesarean delivery in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus was more frequently based on fetal distress as compared to controls (adjusted OR 2.76 CI 1.74-4.40 and adjusted OR 2.31 CI 1.19-4.51, respectively). In comparison with the control group, infants of women with type 1 diabetes had an increased risk of UA pH < 7.20 (adjusted OR 1.88 CI 1.23-2.87) or UA pH < 7.10 (adjusted OR 3.35 CI 1.79-6.27). Also, infants of women with type 1 diabetes were at increased risk for admission to NU as compared to infants of control women (OR 8.07 CI 4.75-13.70).
Women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of fetal distress during labor as compared to controls.
患有糖尿病的妊娠主要存在不良围生期结局风险增加的顾虑。本研究的目的是分析与对照组相比,1 型、2 型和妊娠期糖尿病孕妇在分娩过程中发生胎儿窘迫的比率。
这是在阿姆斯特丹 VU 大学医学中心(一所三级保健医院)进行的回顾性病例对照研究。共纳入 117 例 1 型糖尿病孕妇、59 例 2 型糖尿病孕妇、303 例妊娠期糖尿病孕妇和 15260 例对照组孕妇,她们均于 2004 年 3 月至 2014 年 2 月间分娩。采用线性和逻辑回归分析比较产妇和妊娠特征。采用多元回归分析评估胎儿窘迫和围生期窒息的风险,并根据年龄、吸烟、产次、既往剖宫产、高血压疾病、子痫前期、早产、引产和巨大儿等混杂因素进行调整。主要结局是胎儿窘迫,定义为器械或剖宫产分娩的临床指征;或脐动脉 pH 值(UA pH 值)低;或新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)收治。
与对照组相比,1 型和 2 型糖尿病孕妇行器械或剖宫产分娩的指征更常基于胎儿窘迫(校正比值比 2.76,95%置信区间 1.74-4.40;校正比值比 2.31,95%置信区间 1.19-4.51)。与对照组相比,1 型糖尿病孕妇的胎儿发生 UA pH 值<7.20(校正比值比 1.88,95%置信区间 1.23-2.87)或 UA pH 值<7.10(校正比值比 3.35,95%置信区间 1.79-6.27)的风险增加。此外,与对照组相比,1 型糖尿病孕妇的婴儿入住 NICU 的风险增加(比值比 8.07,95%置信区间 4.75-13.70)。
与对照组相比,1 型和 2 型糖尿病孕妇在分娩过程中发生胎儿窘迫的风险增加。