• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院层面分析心力衰竭患者 30 天再入院率与长期生存率:来自 Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure 的研究结果。

A Hospital Level Analysis of 30-Day Readmission Performance for Heart Failure Patients and Long-Term Survival: Findings from Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of California, Riverside, California.

Duke Clinical Research Institute and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2018 Jun;200:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.11.018. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2017.11.018
PMID:29898841
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medicare utilizes 30-day risk-standardized readmission rates (RSRR) as a measure of hospital quality and applies penalties based on this measure. The objective of this study was to identify the relationship between hospital performance on 30-day RSRR in heart failure (HF) patients and long-term patient survival.

METHODS

Data were collected from Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)-HF and linked with Medicare data. Based on hospital performance for 30-day RSRR, hospitals were grouped into performance quartiles: top 25% (N=11,181), 25-50% (N=10,367), 50-75% (N=8729), and bottom 25% (N=7180). The primary outcome was mortality at 3 years applying Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

The overall 30-day readmission rate was 19.8% and the 3-year mortality rates were 61.8%, 61.0%, 62.6%, and 59.9% for top 25%, 25-50%, 50-75%, and bottom 25% hospitals for 30-day RSRR performance, respectively. Compared to bottom 25% performing hospitals, adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for 3-year mortality were HR 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-1.01), HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.94), HR 1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.06) for the top 25%, 25-50% and 50-75% hospitals respectively. Median survival time was highest for the bottom 25% hospitals on the 30-day RSRR metric.

CONCLUSION

Hospital performance on 30-day readmissions in HF has no or little association with risk adjusted 3-year mortality or median survival. There is a compelling need to utilize more meaningful and patient-centered outcome measures for reporting and incentivizing quality care for HF.

摘要

背景

医疗保险利用 30 天风险标准化再入院率(RSRR)作为衡量医院质量的指标,并根据该指标进行处罚。本研究的目的是确定心力衰竭(HF)患者 30 天 RSRR 与长期患者生存率之间的关系。

方法

从 Get With The Guidelines(GWTG)-HF 中收集数据,并与医疗保险数据相关联。根据 30 天 RSRR 的医院表现,将医院分为绩效四分位数:前 25%(N=11181)、25-50%(N=10367)、50-75%(N=8729)和后 25%(N=7180)。主要结果是应用 Cox 比例风险回归调整患者和医院特征后的 3 年死亡率。

结果

总体 30 天再入院率为 19.8%,3 年死亡率分别为前 25%、25-50%、50-75%和后 25%医院的 61.8%、61.0%、62.6%和 59.9%。与后 25%表现不佳的医院相比,3 年死亡率的调整后的危险比(HR)分别为 HR 0.96(95%置信区间[CI]0.90-1.01)、HR 0.89(95% CI 0.84-0.94)、HR 1.01(95% CI 0.95-1.06)。30 天 RSRR 指标下,中位生存时间最高的是后 25%的医院。

结论

HF 患者 30 天再入院的医院表现与风险调整后 3 年死亡率或中位生存时间没有或几乎没有关联。迫切需要利用更有意义和以患者为中心的结果衡量标准来报告和激励 HF 的优质护理。

相似文献

1
A Hospital Level Analysis of 30-Day Readmission Performance for Heart Failure Patients and Long-Term Survival: Findings from Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure.医院层面分析心力衰竭患者 30 天再入院率与长期生存率:来自 Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure 的研究结果。
Am Heart J. 2018 Jun;200:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.11.018. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
2
Evaluation of Risk-Adjusted Home Time After Hospitalization for Heart Failure as a Potential Hospital Performance Metric.心力衰竭患者出院后风险调整家庭时间评估:一种潜在的医院绩效衡量指标
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;6(2):169-176. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4928.
3
Association Between Hospital Volume, Processes of Care, and Outcomes in Patients Admitted With Heart Failure: Insights From Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure.与因心力衰竭入院患者的医院容量、护理过程和结局之间的关联:来自 Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure 的见解。
Circulation. 2018 Apr 17;137(16):1661-1670. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028077. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
4
Are we targeting the right metric for heart failure? Comparison of hospital 30-day readmission rates and total episode of care inpatient days.我们是否针对心力衰竭的正确指标?医院 30 天再入院率和总住院天数的比较。
Am Heart J. 2013 Jun;165(6):987-994.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
5
Association of 30-Day Readmission Metric for Heart Failure Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program With Quality of Care and Outcomes.医院再入院减少计划下心力衰竭 30 天再入院指标与医疗质量和结果的关系。
JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Dec;4(12):935-946. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.07.003.
6
Association of Hospital Performance Based on 30-Day Risk-Standardized Mortality Rate With Long-term Survival After Heart Failure Hospitalization: An Analysis of the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry.基于 30 天风险标准化死亡率的医院绩效与心力衰竭住院后长期生存的关联:对 Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure 注册研究的分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jun 1;3(6):489-497. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0579.
7
Association of readmission penalty amount with subsequent 30-day risk standardized readmission and mortality rates among patients hospitalized with heart failure: An analysis of get with the guidelines - heart failure participating centers.心力衰竭住院患者再入院处罚金额与随后 30 天风险标准化再入院率和死亡率的关系:来自 Get With The Guidelines-心力衰竭参与中心的分析。
Am Heart J. 2022 Apr;246:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.12.014. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
8
Association of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program Implementation With Readmission and Mortality Outcomes in Heart Failure.医院再入院率降低计划实施与心力衰竭患者再入院和死亡率结局的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jan 1;3(1):44-53. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4265.
9
The need for multiple measures of hospital quality: results from the Get with the Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry of the American Heart Association.需要采用多种措施衡量医院质量:来自美国心脏协会 Get with the Guidelines-Heart Failure 注册研究的结果。
Circulation. 2011 Aug 9;124(6):712-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.026088. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
10
Get With The Guidelines program participation, process of care, and outcome for Medicare patients hospitalized with heart failure.参与“遵循指南”项目的医疗保险心力衰竭住院患者的治疗过程及结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jan;5(1):37-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.959122. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure: Twenty Years in Review, Lessons Learned, and the Road Ahead.《遵循心力衰竭治疗指南:二十年回顾、经验教训与未来之路》
Circ Heart Fail. 2025 May 12:e012936. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.125.012936.
2
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计数据-2023 更新:美国心脏协会报告》。
Circulation. 2023 Feb 21;147(8):e93-e621. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
3
Prognostic Implications of Early and Midrange Readmissions After Acute Heart Failure Hospitalizations: A Report From a Japanese Multicenter Registry.
急性心力衰竭住院后早期和中期再入院的预后意义:来自日本多中心注册研究的报告。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 18;9(10):e014949. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014949. Epub 2020 May 7.
4
Facilitators and barriers of heart failure care in Kerala, India: A qualitative analysis of health-care providers and administrators.印度喀拉拉邦心力衰竭护理的促进因素和障碍:对医疗服务提供者和管理人员的定性分析。
Indian Heart J. 2019 May-Jun;71(3):235-241. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 May 8.
5
Longitudinal trajectories of hospital performance across targeted cardiovascular conditions in the USA.美国针对心血管疾病的医院绩效纵向轨迹。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2020 Jan 1;6(1):62-71. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz026.