Suppr超能文献

快速 SOFA 评分对坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆急诊科发热成年患者 28 天死亡率的预测价值。

Prognostic value of quickSOFA as a predictor of 28-day mortality among febrile adult patients presenting to emergency departments in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

机构信息

Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jun 14;13(6):e0197982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197982. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is a three-item clinical instrument for bedside identification of sepsis patients at risk of poor outcome. qSOFA could be a valuable triage tool in emergency departments of low-income countries, yet its performance in resource-limited settings remains unknown. The prognostic accuracy of qSOFA for 28-day all-cause mortality in febrile adults treated at the EDs in a low-income country was evaluated.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients (≥18 years) with fever (tympanic temperature ≥38°C and fever ≤7 days) who presented between July 2013 and May 2014 at four emergency departments in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Medical history, clinical examination, laboratory and microbiological data were collected to document the cause of fever. Variables for the previous and new sepsis criteria were collected at inclusion and qSOFA, SOFA and SIRS were measured at inclusion. Patients were followed up by phone at day 28. The performance (sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating curve [AUROC]) of qSOFA (score ≥2), SOFA (increase of ≥2 points) and SIRS (≥2 criteria) as predictors of 28-day all-cause mortality was evaluated.

RESULTS

Among the 519 patients (median age: 30 years) included in the analysis, 47% were female and 25% were HIV positive. Overall, 85% had a microbiologically and/or clinically documented infection and 15% a fever of unknown origin. The most common site and causes of infections were the respiratory tract (43%), dengue (26%), malaria (6%) and typhoid fever (5%). Twenty-eight-day all-cause mortality was 6%: 3% for patients with a qSOFA <2 and 24% for those with a score ≥2 (absolute difference, 21%; 95% CI 12%-31%). The prognostic accuracy of qSOFA (AUROC 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.87) for 28-day mortality was similar to SOFA (AUROC 0.79, 0.71-0.87; p = 0.1) and better than SIRS (AUROC 0.61, 0.52-0.71; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with fever at emergency departments in Tanzania, qSOFA had a prognostic accuracy for 28-day mortality comparable to SOFA and superior to SIRS. These results support the use of qSOFA as a triage tool to identify patients with sepsis and at risk of poor outcome in resource-limited countries.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01947075.

摘要

背景

快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)是一种用于床边识别有不良预后风险的脓毒症患者的三项目临床工具。qSOFA 可能是低收入国家急诊科的一种有价值的分诊工具,但它在资源有限的环境中的表现尚不清楚。本研究评估了 qSOFA 对在低收入国家急诊科接受治疗的发热成年人 28 天全因死亡率的预测准确性。

方法

对 2013 年 7 月至 2014 年 5 月在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的四个急诊科就诊的连续发热(鼓膜温度≥38°C 和发热≤7 天)的≥18 岁患者的前瞻性队列研究进行回顾性分析。收集病史、临床检查、实验室和微生物学数据以记录发热原因。纳入时收集了先前和新的脓毒症标准的变量,并在纳入时测量了 qSOFA、SOFA 和 SIRS。通过电话在第 28 天对患者进行随访。评估 qSOFA(评分≥2)、SOFA(增加≥2 分)和 SIRS(≥2 项标准)作为预测 28 天全因死亡率的指标的性能(敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积 [AUROC])。

结果

在纳入分析的 519 例患者中(中位年龄:30 岁),47%为女性,25%为 HIV 阳性。总体而言,85%有微生物学和/或临床确诊的感染,15%有不明原因发热。最常见的感染部位和原因是呼吸道(43%)、登革热(26%)、疟疾(6%)和伤寒(5%)。28 天全因死亡率为 6%:qSOFA<2 的患者为 3%,评分≥2 的患者为 24%(绝对差异,21%;95%CI 12%-31%)。qSOFA(AUROC 0.80,95%CI 0.73-0.87)对 28 天死亡率的预测准确性与 SOFA(AUROC 0.79,0.71-0.87;p=0.1)相似,优于 SIRS(AUROC 0.61,0.52-0.71;p<0.001)。

结论

在坦桑尼亚急诊科发热患者中,qSOFA 对 28 天死亡率的预后准确性与 SOFA 相当,优于 SIRS。这些结果支持将 qSOFA 用作一种分诊工具,以识别脓毒症患者和资源有限国家中预后不良的风险。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01947075。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf8a/6002058/fbb11268022f/pone.0197982.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验