Bishop L A, Wilson D P K, Wise R D, Savarimuthu S M, Anesi G L
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Discipline of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2021 Dec 31;27(4). doi: 10.7196/AJTCCM.2021.v27i4.158. eCollection 2021.
The Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score is a simple bedside tool validated outside of the intensive care unit (ICU) to identify patients with suspected infection who are at risk for poor outcomes.
To assess qSOFA at the time of ICU referral as a mortality prognosticator in adult medical v. surgical patients with suspected infection admitted to an ICU in a resource-limited regional hospital in South Africa (SA).
We conducted a retrospective cohort study on adult medical or surgical patients that were admitted to an ICU in a resource-limited hospital in SA. We performed univariate and multivariable logistic regression and compared nested models using likelihood ratio test, and we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
We recruited a total of 1 162 (medical n=283 and surgical n=875) participants in the study who were admitted to the ICU with suspected infection. qSOFA at the time of ICU referral was highly associated with but poorly discriminant of in-ICU mortality among medical (odds ratio (OR) 2.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 - 5.71; p=0.02; AUROC 0.60; 95% CI 0.53 - 0.67; p=0.02) and surgical (OR 2.74; 95% CI 1.73-4.36; p<0.001; AUROC 0.60; 95% CI 0.55 - 0.65; p=0.04) patients. qSOFA model performance was similar between medical and surgical subgroups (p≥0.26). Addition of qSOFA to a baseline risk factor model including age, sex, and HIV status improved the model discrimination in both subgroups (medical AUROC 0.64; 95% CI 0.56 - 0.71; p=0.049; surgical AUROC 0.69; 95% CI 0.64 - 0.74; p<0.0001).
qSOFA was highly associated with, but poorly discriminant for, poor outcomes among medical and surgical patients with suspected infection admitted to the ICU in a resource-limited setting. These findings suggest that qSOFA may be useful as a tool to identify patients at increased risk of mortality in these populations and in this context.
快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分是一种简单的床边工具,已在重症监护病房(ICU)以外得到验证,用于识别疑似感染且预后不良风险较高的患者。
评估在南非(SA)一家资源有限的地区医院,将qSOFA用于入住ICU的疑似感染成年内科与外科患者的死亡率预测指标。
我们对入住南非一家资源有限医院ICU的成年内科或外科患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归,并使用似然比检验比较了嵌套模型,还计算了受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)。
我们共招募了1162名(内科n = 283,外科n = 875)因疑似感染入住ICU的研究参与者。ICU转诊时的qSOFA与内科(比值比(OR)2.60,95%置信区间(CI)1.19 - 5.71;p = 0.02;AUROC 0.60;95% CI 0.53 - 0.67;p = 0.02)和外科(OR 2.74;95% CI 1.73 - 4.36;p < 0.001;AUROC 0.60;95% CI 0.55 - 0.65;p = 0.04)患者的ICU死亡率高度相关,但鉴别能力较差。qSOFA模型在内科和外科亚组中的表现相似(p≥0.26)。将qSOFA添加到包括年龄、性别和HIV状态的基线风险因素模型中,可提高两个亚组的模型鉴别能力(内科AUROC 0.64;95% CI 0.56 - 0.71;p = 0.049;外科AUROC 0.69;95% CI 0.64 - 0.74;p < 0.0001)。
在资源有限的情况下,入住ICU的疑似感染内科和外科患者中,qSOFA与不良预后高度相关,但鉴别能力较差。这些发现表明,在这些人群和这种情况下,qSOFA可能作为一种识别死亡风险增加患者的工具。