Suppr超能文献

快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分及全身炎症反应综合征标准对疑似脓毒症急诊手术患者不良结局的预测准确性:一项前瞻性观察研究

Accuracy of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score & Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria in Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Emergency Surgical Patients With Suspected Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study.

作者信息

Sreekanth Amith, Jain Ankit, Dutta Souradeep, Shankar Gomathi, Raj Kumar Nagarajan

机构信息

Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Jul 4;14(7):e26560. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26560. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Due to the mixed population enrolled in different studies i.e., medical and surgical cases, conflicting data exists about the accuracy of quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) scores in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with suspected sepsis presenting to the surgical emergency.

METHOD

A prospective observational study was done in the department of surgery of a tertiary teaching hospital, India from June 2018 to July 2019. Consecutive patients who visited the surgical emergency department with suspected sepsis were included. Patients were followed up until hospital discharge or death.

RESULTS

Of the 410 patients screened, 287 were included in the analysis. The median age was 52 years (interquartile range, 41 to 61years) and 208 (72.8%) were men. Around 56.8% of patients had intra-abdominal pathology, and 43.2% had skin and soft -tissue infection. Sixty-nine (24%) patients died during their hospitalization, 98 (34.1%) patients had organ dysfunction, and 168 (58.5%) patients needed admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). A higher qSOFA score (≥2) was associated with organ dysfunction, ICU admission, and in-hospital mortality. The specificity, positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of qSOFA for organ dysfunction (85.7%, 67.8%, 76.3%), ICU admission (92.4%, 89.3%, 64.5%), and in-hospital mortality (81.6%, 52.4%, 77.4%) was higher than SIRS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for qSOFA for these variables was also higher than for SIRS (0.826 vs. 0.524, 0.823 vs. 0.577, and 0.823 vs. 0.555, respectively).

CONCLUSION

qSOFA is a better model for predicting adverse outcomes and mortality, organ dysfunction, and ICU admission in surgical patients. However, SIRS indicates intervention requirements in a surgical patient better than qSOFA.

摘要

目的

由于不同研究纳入的人群混合,即医疗和外科病例,关于快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)和全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)评分在预测外科急诊疑似脓毒症患者不良结局方面的准确性,存在相互矛盾的数据。

方法

2018年6月至2019年7月在印度一家三级教学医院的外科进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。纳入连续就诊于外科急诊科且疑似脓毒症的患者。对患者进行随访直至出院或死亡。

结果

在筛查的410例患者中,287例纳入分析。中位年龄为52岁(四分位间距,41至61岁),208例(72.8%)为男性。约56.8%的患者有腹腔内病变,43.2%有皮肤和软组织感染。69例(24%)患者在住院期间死亡,98例(34.1%)患者出现器官功能障碍,168例(58.5%)患者需要入住重症监护病房(ICU)。较高的qSOFA评分(≥2)与器官功能障碍、入住ICU和院内死亡相关。qSOFA对器官功能障碍(85.7%、67.8%、76.3%)、入住ICU(92.4%、89.3%、64.5%)和院内死亡(81.6%、52.4%、77.4%)的特异性、阳性预测值和诊断准确性均高于SIRS。这些变量的qSOFA的受试者工作特征曲线下面积也高于SIRS(分别为0.826对0.524、0.823对0.577和0.823对0.555)。

结论

qSOFA是预测外科患者不良结局、死亡率、器官功能障碍和入住ICU的更好模型。然而,SIRS在提示外科患者的干预需求方面比qSOFA更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b4a/9348436/948f3ca7566f/cureus-0014-00000026560-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验