• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于城市恐怖主义事件基准风险或脆弱性评估的自逻辑模型。

Autologistic models for benchmark risk or vulnerability assessment of urban terrorism outcomes.

作者信息

Liu Jingyu, Piegorsch Walter W, Schissler A Grant, Cutter Susan L

机构信息

Interdisciplinary Program in Statistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Interdisciplinary Program in Statistics and Department of Mathematics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

出版信息

J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2018 Jun;181(3):803-823. doi: 10.1111/rssa.12323. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1111/rssa.12323
PMID:29904240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5994772/
Abstract

We develop a quantitative methodology to characterize vulnerability among 132 U.S. urban centers ('cities') to terrorist events, applying a place-based vulnerability index to a database of terrorist incidents and related human casualties. A centered autologistic regression model is employed to relate urban vulnerability to terrorist outcomes and also to adjust for autocorrelation in the geospatial data. Risk-analytic 'benchmark' techniques are then incorporated into the modeling framework, wherein levels of high and low urban vulnerability to terrorism are identified. This new, translational adaptation of the risk-benchmark approach, including its ability to account for geospatial autocorrelation, is seen to operate quite flexibly in this socio-geographic setting.

摘要

我们开发了一种定量方法,通过将基于地点的脆弱性指数应用于恐怖事件及相关人员伤亡数据库,来描述美国132个城市中心(“城市”)面对恐怖事件时的脆弱性。我们采用中心自逻辑回归模型来关联城市脆弱性与恐怖事件后果,并对地理空间数据中的自相关性进行调整。然后,将风险分析“基准”技术纳入建模框架,以此识别城市面对恐怖主义时的高脆弱性和低脆弱性水平。这种风险基准方法的新的转化性应用,包括其考虑地理空间自相关性的能力,在这种社会地理环境中表现得相当灵活。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8438/5994772/165b676d27ce/nihms901003f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8438/5994772/c566a9a6a81e/nihms901003f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8438/5994772/79385dd96ad1/nihms901003f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8438/5994772/f9a322dcb43d/nihms901003f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8438/5994772/165b676d27ce/nihms901003f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8438/5994772/c566a9a6a81e/nihms901003f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8438/5994772/79385dd96ad1/nihms901003f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8438/5994772/f9a322dcb43d/nihms901003f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8438/5994772/165b676d27ce/nihms901003f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Autologistic models for benchmark risk or vulnerability assessment of urban terrorism outcomes.用于城市恐怖主义事件基准风险或脆弱性评估的自逻辑模型。
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2018 Jun;181(3):803-823. doi: 10.1111/rssa.12323. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
2
Adjusting statistical benchmark risk analysis to account for non-spatial autocorrelation, with application to natural hazard risk assessment.调整统计基准风险分析以考虑非空间自相关,并应用于自然灾害风险评估。
J Appl Stat. 2021 Apr 1;49(9):2349-2369. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1904385. eCollection 2022.
3
Benchmark analysis for quantifying urban vulnerability to terrorist incidents.量化城市对恐怖袭击事件脆弱性的基准分析。
Risk Anal. 2007 Dec;27(6):1411-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00977.x.
4
Letter Regarding: Piegorsch, W.W., Cutter, S.L., and Hardisty, F. (2007). Benchmark analysis for quantifying urban vulnerability to terrorist incidents. Risk Analysis, 27(6), 1411-1425.关于以下文献的信函:皮戈尔斯奇,W.W.,卡特,S.L.,以及哈迪斯蒂,F.(2007年)。量化城市对恐怖主义事件脆弱性的基准分析。《风险分析》,27(6),第1411 - 1425页。
Risk Anal. 2009 Sep;29(9):1199-200; author reply 1201-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01257.x. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
5
Modeling species-habitat relationships with spatially autocorrelated observation data.利用空间自相关观测数据建立物种-栖息地关系模型。
Ecol Appl. 2006 Oct;16(5):1945-58. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1945:msrwsa]2.0.co;2.
6
Terrorist Attacks Against Firefighters, 1970-2019.1970 - 2019年针对消防员的恐怖袭击
Health Secur. 2023 Mar-Apr;21(2):141-145. doi: 10.1089/hs.2022.0075. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
7
Sample-based Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Autologistic Model.自逻辑模型基于样本的最大似然估计
J Appl Stat. 2007 Jun 29;34(5):547-561. doi: 10.1080/02664760701234967. eCollection 2007.
8
Terrorist Attacks against Hospitals: World-Wide Trends and Attack Types.恐怖袭击医院:全球趋势和袭击类型。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Feb;37(1):25-32. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000012. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
9
The Rising Threat of Terrorist Attacks Against Hospitals.恐怖袭击医院的威胁日益严重。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Apr;37(2):223-229. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000413.
10
Using an autologistic regression model to identify spatial risk factors and spatial risk patterns of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) in Mainland China.运用自逻辑回归模型识别中国大陆手足口病(HFMD)的空间风险因素及空间风险模式。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 14;14:358. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-358.

引用本文的文献

1
Adjusting statistical benchmark risk analysis to account for non-spatial autocorrelation, with application to natural hazard risk assessment.调整统计基准风险分析以考虑非空间自相关,并应用于自然灾害风险评估。
J Appl Stat. 2021 Apr 1;49(9):2349-2369. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1904385. eCollection 2022.
2
From terrorism to flooding: How vulnerable is your city?从恐怖主义到洪水:你的城市有多脆弱?
Signif (Oxf). 2021 Feb;18(1):20-25. doi: 10.1111/1740-9713.01487. Epub 2021 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple Scales of Control on the Structure and Spatial Distribution of Woody Vegetation in African Savanna Watersheds.非洲稀树草原流域木本植被结构和空间分布的多尺度控制
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0145192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145192. eCollection 2015.
2
Disease mapping.疾病地图绘制
Chapman Hall CRC Handb Mod Stat Methods. 2010;2010:217-243. doi: 10.1201/9781420072884-c14.
3
Summarizing risk using risk measures and risk indices.使用风险度量和风险指数总结风险。
Risk Anal. 2014 Dec;34(12):2143-62. doi: 10.1111/risa.12220. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
4
Benchmark analysis for quantifying urban vulnerability to terrorist incidents.量化城市对恐怖袭击事件脆弱性的基准分析。
Risk Anal. 2007 Dec;27(6):1411-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00977.x.
5
On the definition of vulnerabilities in measuring risks to infrastructures.
Risk Anal. 2006 Apr;26(2):293-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00755.x.
6
Benchmark analysis: shopping with proper confidence.
Risk Anal. 2005 Aug;25(4):913-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00636.x.
7
Risk analysis and risk management in an uncertain world.
Risk Anal. 2002 Aug;22(4):655-64. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.00057.
8
Benchmark dose calculation from epidemiological data.基于流行病学数据的基准剂量计算。
Biometrics. 2001 Sep;57(3):698-706. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00698.x.
9
A new method for determining allowable daily intakes.一种确定每日允许摄入量的新方法。
Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1984 Oct;4(5):854-71. doi: 10.1016/0272-0590(84)90107-6.