Geurts Bart
Philosophy Department, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Rev Philos Psychol. 2018;9(2):271-285. doi: 10.1007/s13164-017-0375-y. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
People talk not only to others but also to themselves. The self talk we engage in may be overt or covert, and is associated with a variety of higher mental functions, including reasoning, problem solving, planning and plan execution, attention, and motivation. When talking to herself, a speaker takes devices from her mother tongue, originally designed for interpersonal communication, and employs them to communicate with herself. But what could it even mean to communicate with oneself? To answer that question, we need a theory of communication that explains how the same linguistic devices may be used to communicate with others and oneself. On the received view, which defines communication as information exchange, self talk appears to be an anomaly, for it is hard to see the point of exchanging information with oneself. However, if communication is analysed as a way of negotiating commitments between speaker and hearer, then communication may be useful even when speaker and hearer coincide. Thus a commitment-based approach allows us to make sense of self talk as well as social talk.
人们不仅与他人交谈,也会与自己交谈。我们进行的自我对话可能是公开的,也可能是隐蔽的,并且与多种高级心理功能相关,包括推理、解决问题、规划与计划执行、注意力和动机。当一个人自言自语时,说话者会从她的母语中借用原本用于人际交流的手段,并运用它们与自己交流。但与自己交流究竟意味着什么呢?要回答这个问题,我们需要一种交流理论,来解释相同的语言手段如何既能用于与他人交流,又能用于与自己交流。根据传统观点,即把交流定义为信息交换,自我对话似乎是一种反常现象,因为很难理解与自己交换信息的意义。然而,如果将交流分析为一种在说话者和听话者之间协商承诺的方式,那么即使说话者和听话者是同一人,交流也可能是有用的。因此,基于承诺的方法使我们能够理解自我对话以及社交对话。