Brinthaupt Thomas M
Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, United States.
Front Psychol. 2019 May 10;10:1088. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01088. eCollection 2019.
Despite the popularity of research on intrapersonal communication across many disciplines, there has been little attention devoted to the factors that might account for individual differences in talking to oneself. In this paper, I explore two possible explanations for why people might differ in the frequency of their self-talk. According to the "social isolation" hypothesis, spending more time alone or having socially isolating experiences will be associated with increased self-talk. According to the "cognitive disruption" hypothesis, having self-related experiences that are cognitively disruptive will be associated with increased self-talk frequency. Several studies using the Self-Talk Scale are pertinent to these hypotheses. The results indicate good support for the social isolation hypothesis and strong support for the cognitive disruption hypothesis. I conclude the paper with a wide range of implications for future research on individual differences in self-talk and other kinds of intrapersonal communication.
尽管跨学科的关于人际内沟通的研究很受欢迎,但很少有人关注那些可能导致人们在自言自语方面存在个体差异的因素。在本文中,我探讨了两个关于人们自言自语频率为何存在差异的可能解释。根据“社会隔离”假说,花更多时间独处或有社会隔离经历会与自言自语增加有关。根据“认知干扰”假说,有认知干扰的自我相关经历会与自言自语频率增加有关。几项使用自言自语量表的研究与这些假说相关。结果表明对社会隔离假说有很好的支持,对认知干扰假说有有力的支持。我在论文结尾对未来关于自言自语及其他形式的人际内沟通的个体差异研究提出了广泛的启示。