Suppr超能文献

通过协商式教学法促进科学传播:非专业生物学课程中基因编辑协商的研究

Encouraging Science Communication through Deliberative Pedagogy: A Study of a Gene Editing Deliberation in a Nonmajors Biology Course.

作者信息

Mehltretter Drury Sara A, Bost Anne Gibson, Wysocki Laura M, Ingram Amanda L

机构信息

Wabash College Department of Rhetoric, Crawfordsville, IN 47933.

Wabash College Department of Biology, Crawfordsville, IN 47933.

出版信息

J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2018 Mar 30;19(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1494. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Deliberative pedagogy encourages productive science communication and learning through engagement and discussion of socio-scientific issues (SSI). This article examines a two-day deliberation module on gene editing that took place in an introductory nonmajors biology course, furthering research on integrating deliberative discussion into the biology classroom. The results demonstrate the benefits of a single, episodic deliberation in the classroom, which can positively encourage active discussion and critical awareness of connections between biology and real-world issues, thus contributing to the development of scientific citizenship. Additionally, the findings show that gene editing is an apt SSI topic for the deliberative process because it encourages productive communication practices of scientific citizenship, including discussion, perspective taking, questioning, and consideration of different types of evidence when coming to a decision.

摘要

审议式教学法通过参与和讨论社会科学问题(SSI)来促进有效的科学交流和学习。本文考察了在一门非专业生物学入门课程中进行的为期两天的关于基因编辑的审议模块,进一步推动了将审议式讨论融入生物课堂的研究。结果表明了在课堂上进行单次、阶段性审议的益处,它能够积极鼓励学生进行积极讨论,并对生物学与现实世界问题之间的联系形成批判性认识,从而有助于培养科学公民意识。此外,研究结果表明基因编辑是审议过程中一个合适的SSI主题,因为它鼓励科学公民的有效交流实践,包括讨论、换位思考、提问以及在做决策时考虑不同类型的证据。

相似文献

7
[Science and deliberation].[科学与审议]
Epidemiol Prev. 2008 Nov-Dec;32(6):319-24.
10
Scientific citizenship in a democratic society.科学公民在民主社会中的角色。
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Nov;22(8):927-40. doi: 10.1177/0963662512449598. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

本文引用的文献

4
CRISPR, the disruptor.CRISPR,破坏者。
Nature. 2015 Jun 4;522(7554):20-4. doi: 10.1038/522020a.
5
Creating a national citizen engagement process for energy policy.为能源政策创建一个全国公民参与流程。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13606-13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317512111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
6
Reproductive medicine: The power of three.生殖医学:三的力量。
Nature. 2014 May 22;509(7501):414-7. doi: 10.1038/509414a.
7
Bringing values and deliberation to science communication.将价值观和深思熟虑融入科学传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14081-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212740110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
8
Bridging the gap between science and decision making.弥合科学与决策之间的差距。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14055-61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213532110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验