Mehltretter Drury Sara A, Bost Anne Gibson, Wysocki Laura M, Ingram Amanda L
Wabash College Department of Rhetoric, Crawfordsville, IN 47933.
Wabash College Department of Biology, Crawfordsville, IN 47933.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2018 Mar 30;19(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1494. eCollection 2018.
Deliberative pedagogy encourages productive science communication and learning through engagement and discussion of socio-scientific issues (SSI). This article examines a two-day deliberation module on gene editing that took place in an introductory nonmajors biology course, furthering research on integrating deliberative discussion into the biology classroom. The results demonstrate the benefits of a single, episodic deliberation in the classroom, which can positively encourage active discussion and critical awareness of connections between biology and real-world issues, thus contributing to the development of scientific citizenship. Additionally, the findings show that gene editing is an apt SSI topic for the deliberative process because it encourages productive communication practices of scientific citizenship, including discussion, perspective taking, questioning, and consideration of different types of evidence when coming to a decision.
审议式教学法通过参与和讨论社会科学问题(SSI)来促进有效的科学交流和学习。本文考察了在一门非专业生物学入门课程中进行的为期两天的关于基因编辑的审议模块,进一步推动了将审议式讨论融入生物课堂的研究。结果表明了在课堂上进行单次、阶段性审议的益处,它能够积极鼓励学生进行积极讨论,并对生物学与现实世界问题之间的联系形成批判性认识,从而有助于培养科学公民意识。此外,研究结果表明基因编辑是审议过程中一个合适的SSI主题,因为它鼓励科学公民的有效交流实践,包括讨论、换位思考、提问以及在做决策时考虑不同类型的证据。