Braz Paula, Machado Ausenda, Matias Dias Carlos
Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.
Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal; Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Eur J Med Genet. 2018 Sep;61(9):508-512. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
The term prenatal diagnosis comprises a variety of techniques aimed to determine the health and condition of the embryo or foetus. Its main goal is to identify at an early stage of the pregnancy, if possible, malformations or other conditions that could increase the risk of a negative outcome in the pregnancy. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of prenatal diagnosis in Portugal in pregnancies with congenital anomalies. A cross sectional study was implemented using data for the years 1997 to 2016 from the Portuguese registry of congenital anomalies (RENAC), a population-based registry that follows EUROCAT guidelines. Analysis was restricted to malformations that are potentially detectable by prenatal diagnosis. The effect of prenatal diagnosis on outcome (death vs live birth) was estimated using a regression model. Main results indicate that prenatal diagnosis was performed in 56.1% (n = 7605) of all registered cases. At least one malformation was detected for the first time through ultrasound (47.4%), invasive tests (5.6%) and other tests (2.2%). When analysed severe CA, 54.2% was detectible by prenatal ultrasound distributed as follows: 17.4% were diagnosed before 14 weeks of gestation, 47.6% between 14 and 23 weeks and 35.0% with 24 or more weeks of gestation. TOPFA was the option for 21.3% of these CA. Over the 20 years of analysis, there was a statistically significant increase trend in the detection rate of congenital anomalies through prenatal diagnosis compared to detection at birth or after birth (p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding (year, maternal age, presence of more than one malformation), prenatal diagnosis was associated with more severe outcomes (TOPFA, 40.3%; Death 3.5%) and increased the risk of the pregnancy ending in foetal death (OR = 2.56; 95%CI = 2.06-3.18). These results are in accordance that more severe anomalies are more easily detected prenatally. Considering the results, it is important to raise awareness about the importance of pregnancy planning and preventing the risk factors more associated with CA. More information about prognosis for children with congenital malformations is important for parents and health professionals after prenatal detection.
术语“产前诊断”包括多种旨在确定胚胎或胎儿健康状况的技术。其主要目标是在怀孕早期尽可能识别出可能增加妊娠不良结局风险的畸形或其他情况。本研究的目的是评估葡萄牙产前诊断对先天性异常妊娠的影响。采用基于人群的葡萄牙先天性异常登记处(RENAC)1997年至2016年的数据进行了一项横断面研究,该登记处遵循EUROCAT指南。分析仅限于产前诊断可能检测到的畸形。使用回归模型估计产前诊断对结局(死亡与活产)的影响。主要结果表明,在所有登记病例中,56.1%(n = 7605)进行了产前诊断。至少一种畸形首次通过超声(47.4%)、侵入性检查(5.6%)和其他检查(2.2%)检测到。分析严重先天性异常时,54.2%可通过产前超声检测到,分布如下:17.4%在妊娠14周前诊断,47.6%在14至23周之间诊断,35.0%在妊娠24周或更晚诊断。对于这些先天性异常,21.3%的选择是终止妊娠。在20年的分析中,与出生时或出生后检测相比,通过产前诊断检测先天性异常的检出率有统计学上的显著上升趋势(p < 0.001)。在调整混杂因素(年份、产妇年龄、存在多种畸形)后,产前诊断与更严重的结局(终止妊娠,40.3%;死亡,3.5%)相关,并增加了妊娠以胎儿死亡告终的风险(OR = 2.56;95%CI = 2.06 - 3.18)。这些结果符合更严重的异常更容易在产前检测到这一情况。考虑到这些结果,提高对妊娠计划的重要性以及预防与先天性异常更相关的危险因素的认识很重要。产前检测后,为父母和健康专业人员提供更多关于先天性畸形儿童预后的信息很重要。