• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用多种证据分离城市地下水重金属污染源的方法。

A method for separation of heavy metal sources in urban groundwater using multiple lines of evidence.

机构信息

School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.

Environment Protection Authority Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Environ Pollut. 2018 Oct;241:787-799. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.004
PMID:29908502
Abstract

Determining sources of heavy metals in soils, sediments and groundwater is important for understanding their fate and transport and mitigating human and environmental exposures. Artificially imported fill, natural sediments and groundwater from 240 ha of reclaimed land at Fishermans Bend in Australia, were analysed for heavy metals and other parameters to determine the relative contributions from different possible sources. Fishermans Bend is Australia's largest urban re-development project, however, complicated land-use history, geology, and multiple contamination sources pose challenges to successful re-development. We developed a method for heavy metal source separation in groundwater using statistical categorisation of the data, analysis of soil leaching values and fill/sediment XRF profiling. The method identified two major sources of heavy metals in groundwater: 1. Point sources from local or up-gradient groundwater contaminated by industrial activities and/or legacy landfills; and 2. contaminated fill, where leaching of Cu, Mn, Pb and Zn was observed. Across the precinct, metals were most commonly sourced from a combination of these sources; however, eight locations indicated at least one metal sourced solely from fill leaching, and 23 locations indicated at least one metal sourced solely from impacted groundwater. Concentrations of heavy metals in groundwater ranged from 0.0001 to 0.003 mg/L (Cd), 0.001-0.1 mg/L (Cr), 0.001-0.2 mg/L (Cu), 0.001-0.5 mg/L (Ni), 0.001-0.01 mg/L (Pb), and 0.005-1.2 mg/L (Zn). Our method can determine the likely contribution of different metal sources to groundwater, helping inform more detailed contamination assessments and precinct-wide management and remediation strategies.

摘要

确定土壤、沉积物和地下水中重金属的来源对于了解其归宿和运移以及减轻人类和环境暴露至关重要。澳大利亚费瑟曼斯湾(Fishermans Bend) 240 公顷填海造地的人工进口填土、自然沉积物和地下水,对重金属和其他参数进行了分析,以确定不同可能来源的相对贡献。费瑟曼斯湾是澳大利亚最大的城市再开发项目,然而,复杂的土地使用历史、地质和多个污染来源对成功的再开发构成了挑战。我们开发了一种用于地下水重金属源分离的方法,该方法使用数据的统计分类、土壤浸出值分析和填土/沉积物 XRF 剖析。该方法确定了地下水重金属的两个主要来源:1. 来自局部或上游受工业活动和/或旧垃圾填埋场污染的地下水的点源;2. 受污染的填土,观察到 Cu、Mn、Pb 和 Zn 的浸出。在整个区域,金属最常见的来源是这些来源的组合;然而,有八个地点至少有一种金属仅来源于填土浸出,有二十三个地点至少有一种金属仅来源于受影响的地下水。地下水中重金属的浓度范围为 0.0001 至 0.003mg/L(Cd)、0.001 至 0.1mg/L(Cr)、0.001 至 0.2mg/L(Cu)、0.001 至 0.5mg/L(Ni)、0.001 至 0.01mg/L(Pb)和 0.005 至 1.2mg/L(Zn)。我们的方法可以确定不同金属源对地下水的可能贡献,有助于为更详细的污染评估以及整个区域的管理和修复策略提供信息。

相似文献

1
A method for separation of heavy metal sources in urban groundwater using multiple lines of evidence.利用多种证据分离城市地下水重金属污染源的方法。
Environ Pollut. 2018 Oct;241:787-799. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
2
Distribution, migration and potential risk of heavy metals in the Shima River catchment area, South China.中国南方石马河流域重金属的分布、迁移及潜在风险。
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2015 Oct;17(10):1769-82. doi: 10.1039/c5em00156k. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
3
Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Groundwater of Industrial Township Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India.印度泰米尔纳德邦工业镇区维鲁杜纳加尔地下水重金属健康风险评估。
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2021 Jan;80(1):144-163. doi: 10.1007/s00244-020-00795-y. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
4
Pollution in the urban soils of Lianyungang, China, evaluated using a pollution index, mobility of heavy metals, and enzymatic activities.采用污染指数、重金属迁移性和酶活性对中国连云港城市土壤中的污染状况进行了评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Jan;189(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5740-2. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
5
Spatial characterization and prioritization of heavy metal contaminated soil-water resources in peri-urban areas of National Capital Territory (NCT), Delhi.德里国家首都辖区(NCT)周边地区重金属污染土壤-水资源的空间特征及优先排序
Environ Monit Assess. 2006 Dec;123(1-3):233-47. doi: 10.1007/s10661-006-9193-x. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
6
Assessment of heavy metal pollution and human health risk in urban soils of steel industrial city (Anshan), Liaoning, Northeast China.中国东北辽宁省钢铁工业城市(鞍山)城市土壤中重金属污染及人体健康风险评估
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015 Oct;120:377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.06.019. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
7
Health risk assessment of arsenic and other potentially toxic elements in drinking water from an industrial zone of Gujrat, Pakistan: a case study.巴基斯坦古杰拉特工业区饮用水中砷和其他潜在有毒元素的健康风险评估:案例研究。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Jan 23;191(2):95. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7223-8.
8
Source identification and migration fate of heavy metals of soil-groundwater system in a thousand-year cultivation region.千年耕种区土壤-地下水系统重金属的来源识别与迁移转化规律。
Environ Geochem Health. 2024 Jul 29;46(9):345. doi: 10.1007/s10653-024-02130-z.
9
Source identification and exchangeability of heavy metals accumulated in vegetable soils in the coastal plain of eastern Zhejiang province, China.中国浙江东部沿海平原蔬菜土壤中重金属的来源识别与可交换性
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017 Aug;142:410-416. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.035. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
10
Transformation and speciation of typical heavy metals in soil aquifer treatment system during long time recharging with secondary effluent: Depth distribution and combination.长时间以二级出水回灌时土壤-含水层处理系统中典型重金属的形态转化与分异:深度分布与结合。
Chemosphere. 2016 Dec;165:100-109. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial Analysis of Groundwater Hydrochemistry through Integrated Multivariate Analysis: A Case Study in the Urbanized Langat Basin, Malaysia.通过综合多变量分析对地下水水化学进行空间分析:以马来西亚城市化的兰加特河流域为例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 27;18(11):5733. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115733.