Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Global Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Kidney Int. 2018 Sep;94(3):589-598. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
The benefits of renin angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) are well-established in the general population, particularly among those with diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF), or coronary artery disease (CAD). However, conflicting evidence from trials and concerns about hyperkalemia limit RAASi use in hemodialysis patients, relative to other antihypertensive agents, including beta blockers and calcium channel blockers. Therefore, we investigated prescription patterns and associations with mortality for RAASi and other antihypertensive agents using data from the international Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Cox regression was used to estimate the effect of the prescription of RAASi and other antihypertensive agents at study entry on mortality in 11,421 incident (120 days or less) hemodialysis and 37,124 prevalent (over 120 days) hemodialysis patients from DOPPS phases 2-5 (2002-2015). Over 95% of RAASi were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. RAASi prevalence was 39% and varied minimally by CHF and CAD. The adjusted hazard ratio for RAASi (vs. no RAASi) was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.80-0.99) among incident and 0.94 (0.90-0.99) among prevalent hemodialysis patients, with no convincing evidence of interaction with diabetes, CAD or CHF. Inverse associations with mortality were also observed for beta blockers and calcium channel blockers, and were stronger for angiotensin receptor blockers than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, but this latter finding requires further study. Thus, our observations suggest a relatively small survival benefit of RAASi and other antihypertensive agents in hemodialysis patients, though randomized prospective studies are needed to potentially change prescribing criteria.
肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂(RAASi)在普通人群中的益处已得到充分证实,尤其是在患有糖尿病、充血性心力衰竭(CHF)或冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的人群中。然而,临床试验的相互矛盾的证据和对高钾血症的担忧限制了 RAASi 在血液透析患者中的使用,相对于其他降压药物,包括β受体阻滞剂和钙通道阻滞剂。因此,我们使用国际血液透析结果和实践模式研究(DOPPS)的数据调查了 RAASi 和其他降压药物的处方模式及其与死亡率的关系。Cox 回归用于估计研究开始时 RAASi 和其他降压药物的处方对 DOPPS 阶段 2-5(2002-2015 年)中 11421 例新发生(120 天或更短)和 37124 例现患(超过 120 天)血液透析患者的死亡率的影响。超过 95%的 RAASi 是血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂。RAASi 的患病率为 39%,在 CHF 和 CAD 方面差异很小。新发生和现患血液透析患者中,RAASi(与无 RAASi 相比)的调整后的危险比分别为 0.89(95%置信区间 0.80-0.99)和 0.94(0.90-0.99),没有证据表明与糖尿病、CAD 或 CHF 存在交互作用。β受体阻滞剂和钙通道阻滞剂也与死亡率呈负相关,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂相比,这种相关性更强,但这一发现需要进一步研究。因此,我们的观察结果表明,RAASi 和其他降压药物在血液透析患者中的生存获益相对较小,尽管需要进行随机前瞻性研究以改变潜在的处方标准。