Suppr超能文献

美国家庭的社会经济地位与香烟支出:2010 年至 2015 年消费者支出调查结果。

Socioeconomic status and cigarette expenditure among US households: results from 2010 to 2015 Consumer Expenditure Survey.

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 15;8(6):e020571. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020571.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine (1) the association between household socioeconomic status (SES) and whether a household spends money on cigarettes and (2) socioeconomic variations in proportion of total household expenditure spent on cigarettes among smoking households.

METHODS

We pooled data from six consecutive years, 2010-2015, of the Consumer Expenditure Interview Survey. The interviews involved a structured questionnaire about household income, demographics and expenditures including expenditure on cigarettes. Households that reported cigarette expenditure in the previous 3 months were distinguished as smoking households. SES indicators were household poverty status, education and occupation of the head of household. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of household smoking status with SES. Fractional logistic regression was used to assess the association of cigarette expenditure as a proportion of total household expenditure with SES. The analysis sample size was 39 218.

RESULTS

The probability of spending money on cigarettes was higher among lower SES households. Households in poverty compared with those above 300% of poverty threshold had 1.86 (95% CI 1.61 to 2.16), households headed by a person with less than high school education compared with those headed by a person with at least a bachelor's degree had 3.37 (95% CI 2.92 to 3.89) and households headed by a blue-collar work compared with those headed by a person in a managerial occupation had 1.45 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.66) higher odds of spending money on cigarettes. Similarly, the proportion of total household expenditure spent on cigarettes was higher among lower SES smoking households.

CONCLUSION

Lower SES households are more likely to spend money on cigarettes and spend a larger proportion of their total expenditure on cigarettes. We recommend strategies effective in reducing smoking among low SES smokers.

摘要

目的

(1)考察家庭社会经济地位(SES)与家庭是否花钱购买香烟之间的关系;(2)考察吸烟家庭中用于购买香烟的家庭总支出比例的社会经济差异。

方法

我们汇总了 2010-2015 年连续六年的消费者支出访谈调查数据。访谈采用了一份有关家庭收入、人口统计学和支出(包括香烟支出)的结构化问卷。报告在前 3 个月有香烟支出的家庭被界定为吸烟家庭。SES 指标包括家庭贫困状况、家庭户主的教育程度和职业。采用逻辑回归评估家庭吸烟状况与 SES 的关系。采用分数逻辑回归评估香烟支出占家庭总支出的比例与 SES 的关系。分析样本量为 39218 户。

结果

SES 较低的家庭更有可能花钱购买香烟。与高于贫困线 300%的家庭相比,贫困家庭的这一概率为 1.86(95%CI1.61 至 2.16);与至少拥有学士学位的家庭户主相比,拥有高中以下学历的家庭户主的这一概率为 3.37(95%CI2.92 至 3.89);与蓝领工作的家庭户主相比,从事管理职业的家庭户主的这一概率为 1.45(95%CI1.26 至 1.66)。同样,SES 较低的吸烟家庭用于购买香烟的家庭总支出比例也较高。

结论

SES 较低的家庭更有可能花钱购买香烟,并且用于购买香烟的家庭总支出比例也较高。我们建议采取有效措施,减少 SES 较低的吸烟者吸烟。

相似文献

4
An Empirical Analysis of the Association Between Cigarette Smoking and Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Jan;32(1):161-169. doi: 10.1177/0890117116668481. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
The impact of smoking and quitting on household expenditure patterns and medical care costs in China.
Tob Control. 2009 Apr;18(2):150-5. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.026955. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
6
The Economic Impact of Cigarette Smoking on the Poor in Jordan.
Value Health Reg Issues. 2016 Sep;10:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
9
Cigarette prices, cigarette expenditure and smoking-induced deprivation: findings from the International Tobacco Control Mexico survey.
Tob Control. 2013 Jul;22(4):223-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050613. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
10
Social determinants of household food expenditure in Australia: the role of education, income, geography and time.
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Apr;21(5):902-911. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003342. Epub 2017 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

3
Impact of smoking cessation on household food security.
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;79:49-55.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
5
The New Economic Era Analysis of the Structure System of Chinese Household Consumption Expenditure Based on the ELES Model.
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 9;2022:3278194. doi: 10.1155/2022/3278194. eCollection 2022.
6
Estimating the Impact of Tobacco Parity and Harm Reduction Tax Proposals Using the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 23;18(15):7835. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157835.
7
'Give 'em the vape, sell 'em the pods': razor-and-blades methods of pod e-cigarette pricing.
Tob Control. 2022 Nov;31(6):773-774. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056354. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
8
Tobacco and marijuana use and their association with serum prostate-specific antigen levels among African American men in Chicago.
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Aug 11;20:101174. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101174. eCollection 2020 Dec.
9
The role of dwelling type on food expenditure: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2015-2016 Australian Household Expenditure Survey.
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jun;24(8):2132-2143. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002785. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
10
A new Swedish reference for total and prepubertal height.
Acta Paediatr. 2020 Apr;109(4):754-763. doi: 10.1111/apa.15129. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Tobacco industry strategies undermine government tax policy: evidence from commercial data.
Tob Control. 2017 Oct 9;27(5):488-97. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053891.
3
Household Expenditure on Tobacco Consumption in a Poverty-Stricken Rural District in Sri Lanka.
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2017 Mar;29(2):140-148. doi: 10.1177/1010539517690225. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
4
Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2005-2015.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Nov 11;65(44):1205-1211. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6544a2.
6
A life-course perspective on economic stress and tobacco smoking: a population-based study.
Addiction. 2013 Jul;108(7):1305-14. doi: 10.1111/add.12143. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
7
Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status effects on adolescent smoking: a multilevel cohort-sequential latent growth analysis.
Am J Public Health. 2013 Mar;103(3):543-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300830. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
8
The consequences of high cigarette excise taxes for low-income smokers.
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e43838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043838. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
9
Cigarette prices, cigarette expenditure and smoking-induced deprivation: findings from the International Tobacco Control Mexico survey.
Tob Control. 2013 Jul;22(4):223-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050613. Epub 2012 Aug 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验