• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国家庭的社会经济地位与香烟支出:2010 年至 2015 年消费者支出调查结果。

Socioeconomic status and cigarette expenditure among US households: results from 2010 to 2015 Consumer Expenditure Survey.

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 15;8(6):e020571. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020571.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020571
PMID:29909369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6009464/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine (1) the association between household socioeconomic status (SES) and whether a household spends money on cigarettes and (2) socioeconomic variations in proportion of total household expenditure spent on cigarettes among smoking households.

METHODS

We pooled data from six consecutive years, 2010-2015, of the Consumer Expenditure Interview Survey. The interviews involved a structured questionnaire about household income, demographics and expenditures including expenditure on cigarettes. Households that reported cigarette expenditure in the previous 3 months were distinguished as smoking households. SES indicators were household poverty status, education and occupation of the head of household. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of household smoking status with SES. Fractional logistic regression was used to assess the association of cigarette expenditure as a proportion of total household expenditure with SES. The analysis sample size was 39 218.

RESULTS

The probability of spending money on cigarettes was higher among lower SES households. Households in poverty compared with those above 300% of poverty threshold had 1.86 (95% CI 1.61 to 2.16), households headed by a person with less than high school education compared with those headed by a person with at least a bachelor's degree had 3.37 (95% CI 2.92 to 3.89) and households headed by a blue-collar work compared with those headed by a person in a managerial occupation had 1.45 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.66) higher odds of spending money on cigarettes. Similarly, the proportion of total household expenditure spent on cigarettes was higher among lower SES smoking households.

CONCLUSION

Lower SES households are more likely to spend money on cigarettes and spend a larger proportion of their total expenditure on cigarettes. We recommend strategies effective in reducing smoking among low SES smokers.

摘要

目的

(1)考察家庭社会经济地位(SES)与家庭是否花钱购买香烟之间的关系;(2)考察吸烟家庭中用于购买香烟的家庭总支出比例的社会经济差异。

方法

我们汇总了 2010-2015 年连续六年的消费者支出访谈调查数据。访谈采用了一份有关家庭收入、人口统计学和支出(包括香烟支出)的结构化问卷。报告在前 3 个月有香烟支出的家庭被界定为吸烟家庭。SES 指标包括家庭贫困状况、家庭户主的教育程度和职业。采用逻辑回归评估家庭吸烟状况与 SES 的关系。采用分数逻辑回归评估香烟支出占家庭总支出的比例与 SES 的关系。分析样本量为 39218 户。

结果

SES 较低的家庭更有可能花钱购买香烟。与高于贫困线 300%的家庭相比,贫困家庭的这一概率为 1.86(95%CI1.61 至 2.16);与至少拥有学士学位的家庭户主相比,拥有高中以下学历的家庭户主的这一概率为 3.37(95%CI2.92 至 3.89);与蓝领工作的家庭户主相比,从事管理职业的家庭户主的这一概率为 1.45(95%CI1.26 至 1.66)。同样,SES 较低的吸烟家庭用于购买香烟的家庭总支出比例也较高。

结论

SES 较低的家庭更有可能花钱购买香烟,并且用于购买香烟的家庭总支出比例也较高。我们建议采取有效措施,减少 SES 较低的吸烟者吸烟。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic status and cigarette expenditure among US households: results from 2010 to 2015 Consumer Expenditure Survey.美国家庭的社会经济地位与香烟支出:2010 年至 2015 年消费者支出调查结果。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 15;8(6):e020571. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020571.
2
Socioeconomic status and tobacco expenditure among Australian households: results from the 1998-99 Household Expenditure Survey.澳大利亚家庭的社会经济地位与烟草支出:1998 - 1999年家庭支出调查结果
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Oct;57(10):798-801. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.10.798.
3
Cigarette Smoking and Its Financial Burden among Iranian Households: Evidence from Household Income and Expenditures Survey.伊朗家庭的吸烟状况及其经济负担:来自家庭收入和支出调查的证据。
J Res Health Sci. 2020 Oct 13;20(4):e00494. doi: 10.34172/jrhs.2020.28.
4
An Empirical Analysis of the Association Between Cigarette Smoking and Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.吸烟与参与补充营养援助计划之间关联的实证分析
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Jan;32(1):161-169. doi: 10.1177/0890117116668481. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
The impact of smoking and quitting on household expenditure patterns and medical care costs in China.吸烟和戒烟对中国家庭支出模式和医疗保健费用的影响。
Tob Control. 2009 Apr;18(2):150-5. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.026955. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
6
The Economic Impact of Cigarette Smoking on the Poor in Jordan.吸烟对约旦贫困人口的经济影响。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2016 Sep;10:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
7
US state cigarette tax increases and smoke-free legislation in relation to cigarette expenditure across household socio-economic circumstances: a quasi-experimental study.美国各州提高香烟税和无烟立法对家庭社会经济环境下香烟支出的影响:一项准实验研究。
Addiction. 2019 Apr;114(4):721-729. doi: 10.1111/add.14505. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
8
Effects of cigarette price increase on fresh food expenditures of low-income South Korean households that spend relatively more on cigarettes.香烟价格上涨对相对更多地消费香烟的韩国低收入家庭购买新鲜食品支出的影响。
Health Policy. 2021 Jan;125(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
9
Cigarette prices, cigarette expenditure and smoking-induced deprivation: findings from the International Tobacco Control Mexico survey.香烟价格、香烟支出和吸烟导致的贫困:来自墨西哥国际烟草控制调查的发现。
Tob Control. 2013 Jul;22(4):223-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050613. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
10
Social determinants of household food expenditure in Australia: the role of education, income, geography and time.澳大利亚家庭食品支出的社会决定因素:教育、收入、地理位置和时间的作用。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Apr;21(5):902-911. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003342. Epub 2017 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Children and Adolescents: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Co-Morbid Neuropsychiatric Conditions in a US Nationwide Study.美国一项全国性研究:儿童和青少年接触烟草烟雾的情况、危险因素及共病神经精神疾病
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 22;12(21):2102. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212102.
2
Selective Reduction of Socioeconomic Disparities in the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace: Effects of Cigarette and E-cigarette Flavor Restrictions.选择性减少实验烟草市场中的社会经济差异:香烟和电子烟口味限制的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 May 31;26(Supplement_2):S103-S111. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad070.
3
Impact of smoking cessation on household food security.戒烟对家庭食品安全的影响。
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;79:49-55.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
4
Percentage of income spent on tobacco and intention to quit: a cross-sectional analysis of the JASTIS 2020 study.用于烟草的收入比例和戒烟意愿:对 JASTIS 2020 研究的横断面分析。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2022;27:46. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.22-00103.
5
The New Economic Era Analysis of the Structure System of Chinese Household Consumption Expenditure Based on the ELES Model.基于扩展线性支出系统模型的中国城镇居民消费结构系统的新经济时代分析。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 9;2022:3278194. doi: 10.1155/2022/3278194. eCollection 2022.
6
Estimating the Impact of Tobacco Parity and Harm Reduction Tax Proposals Using the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace.利用实验性烟草市场估计烟草均等和减少伤害税收提案的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 23;18(15):7835. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157835.
7
'Give 'em the vape, sell 'em the pods': razor-and-blades methods of pod e-cigarette pricing.“给他们电子烟,卖给他们烟弹”:烟弹式电子烟定价的剃须刀与刀片模式。
Tob Control. 2022 Nov;31(6):773-774. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056354. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
8
Tobacco and marijuana use and their association with serum prostate-specific antigen levels among African American men in Chicago.芝加哥非裔美国男性中烟草和大麻的使用及其与血清前列腺特异性抗原水平的关联。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Aug 11;20:101174. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101174. eCollection 2020 Dec.
9
The role of dwelling type on food expenditure: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2015-2016 Australian Household Expenditure Survey.居住类型对食品支出的影响:基于 2015-2016 年澳大利亚家庭支出调查的横断面分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jun;24(8):2132-2143. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002785. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
10
A new Swedish reference for total and prepubertal height.一个新的瑞典全身高和青春前期身高参考值。
Acta Paediatr. 2020 Apr;109(4):754-763. doi: 10.1111/apa.15129. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Tobacco industry strategies undermine government tax policy: evidence from commercial data.烟草行业策略破坏政府税收政策:来自商业数据的证据。
Tob Control. 2017 Oct 9;27(5):488-97. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053891.
2
Availability and Use of Cheap Tobacco in the United Kingdom 2002-2014: Findings From the International Tobacco Control Project.2002-2014 年英国廉价烟草的供应和使用情况:国际烟草控制项目的调查结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 May 3;20(6):714-724. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx108.
3
Household Expenditure on Tobacco Consumption in a Poverty-Stricken Rural District in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡贫困农村地区家庭烟草消费支出
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2017 Mar;29(2):140-148. doi: 10.1177/1010539517690225. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
4
Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2005-2015.当前美国成年人吸烟状况 - 2005-2015 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Nov 11;65(44):1205-1211. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6544a2.
5
Socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers' ratings of plain and branded cigarette packaging: an experimental study.社会经济地位不利的吸烟者对普通和品牌香烟包装的评价:一项实验研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 6;4(2):e004078. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004078.
6
A life-course perspective on economic stress and tobacco smoking: a population-based study.从生命历程角度探讨经济压力与吸烟行为的关系:一项基于人群的研究。
Addiction. 2013 Jul;108(7):1305-14. doi: 10.1111/add.12143. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
7
Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status effects on adolescent smoking: a multilevel cohort-sequential latent growth analysis.个体和邻里社会经济地位对青少年吸烟的影响:多层次队列序列潜在增长分析。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Mar;103(3):543-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300830. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
8
The consequences of high cigarette excise taxes for low-income smokers.高香烟消费税对低收入烟民的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e43838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043838. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
9
Cigarette prices, cigarette expenditure and smoking-induced deprivation: findings from the International Tobacco Control Mexico survey.香烟价格、香烟支出和吸烟导致的贫困:来自墨西哥国际烟草控制调查的发现。
Tob Control. 2013 Jul;22(4):223-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050613. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
10
Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in smoking prevalence, consumption, initiation, and cessation between 2001 and 2008 in the Netherlands. Findings from a national population survey.2001 年至 2008 年期间荷兰吸烟流行率、消费、起始和戒烟方面的社会经济不平等趋势。全国人口调查结果。
BMC Public Health. 2012 May 18;12:303. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-303.