Suppr超能文献

新型经皮椎弓根螺钉与传统开放椎弓根螺钉固定治疗无神经功能缺损胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效比较。

Comparison of clinical results between novel percutaneous pedicle screw and traditional open pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit.

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, 555 Friendship East Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shanxi, China.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2019 Jul;43(7):1749-1754. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4012-x. Epub 2018 Jun 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of novel percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation and traditional open surgery for thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit.

METHODS

Sixty adult patients with single thoracolumbar fracture between June 2014 and June 2016 were recruited in this study, randomly divided into open fixation group (group A) or minimally invasive percutaneous fixation group (group B). Clinical and surgical evaluation including surgery time, blood losses, radiation times, hospital stay, and complication were performed. The two groups of patients with pre-operative and last follow-up anterior height ratio of fracture vertebral, Cobb angle of fracture vertebral, and VAS score of back pain were compared.

RESULTS

All patients completed valid follow-ups, with an average time period of 15.4 months (12-26 months). Group B achieved much better results in time of operation, intra-operative blood loss, and length of stay than group A (P < 0.05). Group A was significantly better than group B in the times of radiation (P < 0.05). The VAS score was significantly lower in group B than in group A at three days after the operation (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the anterior height ratio of fracture vertebral, Cobb angle, and VAS score in the last follow-up (P > 0.05). No injured nerve or other severe complications occurred in both groups; one of the patients from group A had back and loin pain lasting for about one month, which resolved after analgesia and functional training. There was no significant difference between the two groups in incidence of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel percutaneous pedicle screws with angle reset function can achieve the same effect as traditional open pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures without nerve injuries. Percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation has the characteristics of shorter operative time, less bleeding, and less pain, but it needs more radiation times.

摘要

目的

比较新型经皮微创椎弓根螺钉固定与传统开放手术治疗无神经损伤胸腰椎骨折的疗效和安全性。

方法

本研究纳入 2014 年 6 月至 2016 年 6 月间收治的 60 例单节段胸腰椎骨折成年患者,随机分为开放固定组(A 组)或微创经皮固定组(B 组)。临床和手术评估包括手术时间、出血量、射线暴露时间、住院时间和并发症。比较两组患者术前和末次随访时骨折椎体前缘高度比、骨折椎体 Cobb 角和腰痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)。

结果

所有患者均完成有效随访,平均随访时间 15.4 个月(12-26 个月)。B 组在手术时间、术中出血量和住院时间方面明显优于 A 组(P < 0.05)。A 组在射线暴露时间方面明显优于 B 组(P < 0.05)。术后 3 天,B 组 VAS 评分明显低于 A 组(P < 0.05)。末次随访时,两组患者骨折椎体前缘高度比、Cobb 角和 VAS 评分差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两组均无神经损伤等严重并发症发生;A 组 1 例患者术后腰痛和腰背部疼痛持续约 1 个月,经止痛和功能训练后缓解。两组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义。

结论

新型经皮椎弓根螺钉复位功能可达到与传统开放椎弓根螺钉固定相同的效果,治疗无神经损伤的胸腰椎骨折。微创经皮椎弓根螺钉固定具有手术时间短、出血量少、疼痛轻的特点,但需要更多的射线暴露时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验