Claes Annes J, Van de Heyning Paul, Gilles Annick, Van Rompaey Vincent, Mertens Griet
a Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery , Antwerp University Hospital (UZA) , Antwerp , Belgium.
b Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , University of Antwerp (UA) , Antwerp , Belgium.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2018 Sep;19(5):239-254. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2018.1484328. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
To critically assess the current status of the literature on cognitive outcomes after cochlear implantation in older adults.
Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE (PubMed) and Cochrane Library, and checking reference lists of relevant articles. No restrictions were imposed regarding language, publication date, or publication status. Eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) the study sample included older adults aged 50 or over with severe to profound bilateral hearing loss, (2) the participants received a multi-electrode cochlear implant, and (3) a cognitive test was performed before and after implantation. Risk of bias was assessed with respect to: (A) the suitability of the cognitive tests to examine cognition in hearing-impaired (HI) subjects, (B) the control of practice effects, (C) statistical methods, and (D) other sources of bias.
Out of 2716 retrieved records, 6 were found eligible, examining a total of 166 patients. Five of these studies reported improvements in cognition postimplantation and one study did not observe significant changes. Control of practice effects and the statistical methods were the most common origin of observed bias.
The currently reviewed studies performed pioneering work and are indispensable for the field. However, they do not provide conclusive evidence of improved cognitive outcomes after cochlear implantation in older adults.
Well-designed studies with long follow-up periods are imperative to verify whether cochlear implantation influences cognition in older adults. New research is stimulated to use appropriate cognitive assessment tools for HI individuals, to control for practice effects, and to perform appropriate statistical tests.
严格评估有关老年人人工耳蜗植入术后认知结果的文献现状。
通过检索MEDLINE(PubMed)和Cochrane图书馆,并检查相关文章的参考文献列表来确定研究。对语言、出版日期或出版状态不设限制。纳入标准如下:(1)研究样本包括年龄在50岁及以上、患有重度至极重度双侧听力损失的老年人;(2)参与者接受了多电极人工耳蜗植入;(3)在植入前后进行了认知测试。从以下方面评估偏倚风险:(A)认知测试对听力受损(HI)受试者认知能力的适用性;(B)练习效应的控制;(C)统计方法;(D)其他偏倚来源。
在检索到的2716条记录中,有6条符合条件,共涉及166名患者。其中5项研究报告了植入后认知能力的改善,1项研究未观察到显著变化。练习效应的控制和统计方法是观察到的偏倚最常见的来源。
目前所综述的研究开展了开创性工作,对该领域不可或缺。然而,它们并未提供确凿证据表明老年人人工耳蜗植入术后认知结果得到改善。
必须开展设计良好、随访期长的研究,以验证人工耳蜗植入是否会影响老年人的认知。鼓励开展新的研究,为听力受损个体使用合适的认知评估工具,控制练习效应,并进行适当的统计检验。