Su Qiang
College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
PeerJ. 2018 Jun 12;6:e4951. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4951. eCollection 2018.
Although many ecologists focus on the relationship between species richness () and evenness (), conflicts between observation and theory are difficult to reconcile. Empirical - relationships were not consistent, while relationships show strong correlation between and . Since essentially depended on the relative abundance distribution (RAD), the hypothesis of this paper was that the - relationship should be determined by RAD. Theoretical - relationships for various RADs have already been reported, but they were rarely assessed by the raw data. This study constructed - relationships for a specific RAD, which indicated that if the community had a fractal distribution of rank abundance, would decrease with , and the - relationship would be unique for a given RAD. Such theoretical expectations were supported by three datasets with 82 samples, which suggested that the - relationship were controlled by RAD and inconsistent - relationships in statistical analyses could be accounted for by the variation of underlying RAD model between communities. From the perspective of RAD, it could be too early to split the diversity into and only based on the - relationship in statistical analyses.
尽管许多生态学家专注于物种丰富度()和均匀度()之间的关系,但观察结果与理论之间的冲突却难以调和。实证关系并不一致,而关系表明 与 之间存在强相关性。由于 本质上取决于相对丰度分布(RAD),本文的假设是 - 关系应由RAD决定。已经报道了各种RAD的理论 - 关系,但很少通过原始数据进行评估。本研究构建了特定RAD的 - 关系,这表明如果群落具有分形等级丰度分布, 会随着 而降低,并且对于给定的RAD, - 关系将是唯一的。三个包含82个样本的数据集支持了这种理论预期,这表明 - 关系由RAD控制,统计分析中不一致的 - 关系可以通过群落之间潜在RAD模型的变化来解释。从RAD的角度来看,仅基于统计分析中的 - 关系将多样性分为 和 可能为时过早。