Suppr超能文献

扫描电子显微镜评估矫治器在牙齿上的贴合度。

Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of aligner fit on teeth.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2018 Sep;88(5):596-601. doi: 10.2319/120417-827.1. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The fitting of aligners on anchorage teeth is a crucial factor in clear aligner orthodontics. The purpose of this experimental study was to evaluate the fitting of two aligner systems, Invisalign and CA-Clear Aligner, using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Passive aligners (Invisalign and CA-Clear Aligner) were adapted on resin casts obtained by stereolithography (STL) files of a patient, and then sectioned buccolingually. Upper and lower central incisors, upper and lower first premolars, and upper and lower first molars were the regions analyzed. Representative microphotographs of sections were taken with a scanning electron microscope (SEM); a total of 160 micrometric measurements were obtained and analyzed with ANOVA tests.

RESULTS

Invisalign provided an overall better fit on lower incisors ( F = 11.48, P = .0095) and on lower molars ( F = 19.93, P = .0012). Considering the different regions, Invisalign provided better fit at the gingival edge of the buccal aspect on lower incisors ( F = 11.33, P = 0.0056) and at the gingival edge of the lingual aspect on upper premolars ( F =5.34, P = 0.0047). On the upper molars, Invisalign provided better fit at the gingival edge of the buccal aspect, while CA-Clear Aligner provided better fit at the buccal maximum convexity, on the buccal cusp, on the occlusal groove and at the palatal cusp. On lower molars, Invisalign showed a more accurate fit at the buccal aspect points.

CONCLUSIONS

Invisalign and CA-Clear Aligner exhibited comparable fit on anchorage teeth. Invisalign provided better fit at the gingival edges of aligners, while the CA-Clear Aligner provided better fit on complex occlusal surfaces.

摘要

目的

在隐形矫正正畸中,矫治器在支抗牙上的贴合是一个关键因素。本实验研究的目的是使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估两种隐形矫正器系统,Invisalign 和 CA-Clear Aligner 的贴合度。

材料和方法

通过立体光刻(STL)文件获得的树脂模型上适配被动矫治器(Invisalign 和 CA-Clear Aligner),然后颊舌向切开。分析的区域包括上颌和下颌中切牙、上颌和下颌第一前磨牙以及上颌和下颌第一磨牙。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)拍摄截面的代表性微观照片;总共获得了 160 个微米测量值,并通过方差分析(ANOVA)进行了分析。

结果

Invisalign 在下颌切牙( F = 11.48,P =.0095)和下颌磨牙( F = 19.93,P =.0012)上整体提供了更好的贴合度。考虑到不同的区域,Invisalign 在下颌切牙的颊侧龈缘( F = 11.33,P = 0.0056)和上颌前磨牙的舌侧龈缘( F =5.34,P = 0.0047)处提供了更好的贴合度。在上颌磨牙上,Invisalign 在颊侧龈缘处提供了更好的贴合度,而 CA-Clear Aligner 在颊侧最大凸度、颊尖、咬合槽和腭尖处提供了更好的贴合度。在下颌磨牙上,Invisalign 在颊侧点处显示出更精确的贴合度。

结论

Invisalign 和 CA-Clear Aligner 在支抗牙上的贴合度相当。Invisalign 在矫治器的龈缘处提供了更好的贴合度,而 CA-Clear Aligner 在复杂的咬合表面处提供了更好的贴合度。

相似文献

7
Presurgical orthodontic decompensation with clear aligners.使用透明牙套进行术前正畸补偿。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Oct;162(4):538-553. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.12.019.
8
Assessment of clear aligner accuracy of 2 clear aligners systems.评估两种透明牙套系统的准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Dec;164(6):793-804. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.05.028. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
9
Comparing virtual setup software programs for clear aligner treatment.比较用于隐形矫治治疗的虚拟排牙软件程序。
J World Fed Orthod. 2023 Apr;12(2):50-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Management of overbite with the Invisalign appliance.使用隐适美矫治器治疗深覆合
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Apr;151(4):691-699.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.09.022.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验