Suppr超能文献

混合牙列期前牙开颌正畸与正颌治疗的系统评价

Systematic review for orthodontic and orthopedic treatments for anterior open bite in the mixed dentition.

作者信息

Pisani Lucia, Bonaccorso Laura, Fastuca Rosamaria, Spena Raffaele, Lombardo Luca, Caprioglio Alberto

机构信息

Division of Orthodontics, Department of Surgical and Morphological Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.

Postgraduate School of Orthodontics, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0142-0. Epub 2016 Sep 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment options for the early treatment of anterior open bite are still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the actual available evidence on treatments of anterior open bite in the mixed dentition in order to assess the effectiveness of the early treatment in reducing open bite, the most efficacious treatment strategy and the stability of the results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature survey was done on November 15, 2015, by means of appropriate Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) using the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS, VHL, and WEB OF SCIENCE. Randomized clinical trials and studies with a control group (treated or untreated) were then selected by two authors. Trials including patients with syndromes or in the permanent dentition and studies concerning treatment with extractions, full-fixed appliances, or surgery were not considered. Full articles were retrieved for abstracts or titles that met the initial inclusion criteria or lacked sufficient detail for immediate exclusion.

RESULTS

Two thousand five hundred sixty-nine studies about open bite were available; the search strategy selected 240 of them. Twenty-four articles have been judged suitably for the final review, and their relevant data were analyzed.

DISCUSSION

Although this review confirms the effectiveness of early treatment of open bite, particularly when no-compliance strategies are employed, meta-analysis was unfeasible due to lack of standardization, important methodological limitations, and shortcomings of the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

A more robust approach to trial design in terms of methodology and error analysis is needed. Besides, more studies with longer periods of follow-up are required.

摘要

背景

早期治疗前牙开颌的治疗方案仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估混合牙列期前牙开颌治疗的实际可用证据,以评估早期治疗在减少开颌方面的有效性、最有效的治疗策略以及结果的稳定性。

材料与方法

2015年11月15日进行了文献检索,通过使用适当的医学主题词(MeSH)检索以下数据库:PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、LILACS、VHL和科学网。然后由两位作者选择随机临床试验和有对照组(治疗或未治疗)的研究。不考虑包括患有综合征患者或恒牙列患者的试验以及关于拔牙、全固定矫治器或手术治疗的研究。对于符合初始纳入标准或缺乏足够细节以立即排除的摘要或标题,检索全文。

结果

有2569项关于开颌的研究;检索策略筛选出其中240项。24篇文章被判定适合最终综述,并对其相关数据进行了分析。

讨论

尽管本综述证实了早期治疗开颌的有效性,特别是在采用不依从策略时,但由于缺乏标准化、重要的方法学局限性和研究缺陷,荟萃分析不可行。

结论

在方法学和误差分析方面需要一种更稳健的试验设计方法。此外,需要更多随访期更长的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75dc/5027197/c586a8d8f55c/40510_2016_142_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验